柴达木盆地英西地区湖相混积岩致密储层成岩相类型与测井表征方法
Types and Logging Prediction Methods of Diagenetic Facies in the Tight Reservoir of Mixed Siliciclastic-Carbonate Lacustrine Successions from Yingxi Area, Qaidam Basin
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2019.97069, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 代全齐, 王贵文*, 范旭强, 贺智博, 赵 星:中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室,北京;中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院,北京;马丽娟:青海油田勘探事业部,甘肃 酒泉;李亚锋, 伍坤宇:青海油田勘探开发研究院,甘肃 酒泉
关键词: 成岩作用成岩相测井表征储层质量致密混积岩Diagenesis Diagenetic Facies Well Logs Prediction Reservoir Quality Tight Mixed Siliciclastic-Carbonate
摘要: 柴达木盆地英西地区下干柴沟组上段作为一套典型的湖相混积岩致密储层,成岩相的分类特征与测井表征对指导该区的油气勘探具有至关重要的作用。X衍射、薄片和扫描电镜等资料表明,储层矿物类型以白云石、方解石、石英和黏土矿物为主,成岩作用主要分为压实作用、胶结作用、破裂作用和溶蚀作用。根据矿物组分和成岩作用类型与强度,将成岩相划分为成岩微裂缝相、溶蚀相、晶间孔相和压实致密相。其中,压实致密相和晶间孔相发育广泛,成岩微裂缝相和溶蚀相为有利成岩相。含砂或砂质灰云岩有利于成岩微裂缝相的发育,溶蚀相多发育在碳酸盐矿物含量高的层段,普遍发育的泥粉晶碳酸盐矿物和高含量的黏土矿物是导致储层晶间孔相和压实致密相广泛发育的根本原因。在明确成岩相主控因素的基础上,通过挑选成岩相响应敏感的测井参数,运用主成分分析法对成岩相类型进行测井定量表征。结果表明,单井纵向成岩相类型变化频率快,成岩微裂缝相常与构造裂缝伴生,而在无构造裂缝的叠加作用时,溶蚀相物性最好,压实致密成岩相物性最差。
Abstract: The upper section of the Lower Ganchaigou Formation in the Yingxi area of the Qaidam Basin is a typical compact reservoir of mixed Siliciclastic-carbonate Lacustrine Successions. Classification characteristics of diagenetic facies and log characterization are critical to guide oil and gas exploration in this area. The analysis results of X-ray diffraction, thin sections and scanning electron microscopy indicate that the types of reservoir minerals are dominated by dolomite, calcite, quartz and clay minerals. The diagenesis is mainly divided into compaction, cementation, rupture and dissolution. According to the mineral composition and diagenesis type and strength, the diagenetic facies are divided into diagenetic microfracture facies, dissolution facies, intercrystalline pore facies and compacted dense facies. Among them, compacted dense facies and intercrystalline pore facies are widely developed, and diagenetic microfracture facies and dissolved facies are favorable diagenetic facies. Sandy or sandy limy dolostone is favorable for the development of diagenetic microfracture facies. The dissolution facies is mostly developed in the high carbonate minerals. The commonly developed micritic carbonate minerals and high-content clay minerals are the reasons why the intercrystalline pore facies and compacted dense facies developed. On the basis of clarifying the main controlling factors of diagenetic facies, the sensible logging parameters of the diagenetic facies response were selected and characterized by principal component analysis. The results show that the change frequency of the vertical diagenetic facies is fast, and the diagenetic microfractures are often associated with structural fractures. However, in the superposition of no structural fractures, the petrophysical properties of dissolution facies are the best. The compacted lithofacies have the worst petrophysical properties.
文章引用:代全齐, 王贵文, 范旭强, 贺智博, 赵星, 马丽娟, 李亚锋, 伍坤宇. 柴达木盆地英西地区湖相混积岩致密储层成岩相类型与测井表征方法[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2019, 9(7): 645-659. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2019.97069

参考文献

[1] Anan, T.I. (2014) Facies Analysis and Sequence Stratigraphy of the Cenomanian-Turonian Mixed Siliciclastic-Carbonate Sediments in West Sinai, Egypt. Sedimentary Geology, 307, 34-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Bernabéu, Á.P., Webster, J.M., Beaman, R.J., Reimer, P.J. and Renema, W. (2014) Filling the Gap: A 60 ky Record of Mixed Carbonate-Siliciclastic Turbidite Deposition from the Great Barrier Reef. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 50, 40-50.
[3] Coffey, B.P. and Sunde, R.F. (2014) Lithology-Based Sequence-Stratigraphic Framework of a Mixed Carbonate-Siliciclastic Succession, Lower Cretaceous, Atlantic Coastal Plain. AAPG Bulletin, 98, 1599-1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 袁剑英, 黄成刚, 夏青松, 等. 成化湖盆碳酸盐岩储层特征及孔隙形成机理——以柴西地区始新统下干柴沟组为例[J]. 地质论评, 2016, 62(1): 111-126.
[5] 王越, 陈世悦, 张关龙, 等. 咸化湖盆混积岩分类与混积相带沉积相特征——以准噶尔盆地南缘芦草沟组与吐哈盆地西北缘塔尔朗组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(9): 1021-1035.
[6] 杜金虎, 何海清, 杨涛, 等. 中国致密油勘探进展及面临的挑战[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2014, 19(1): 1-9.
[7] 贾承造, 郑民, 张永峰. 中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2): 129-135.
[8] 邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征机理及展望——以中国致密油和致密气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 173-185.
[9] 崔玉峰. 致密砂岩储层成岩相测井定量表征方法及应用[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国石油大学, 2017.
[10] 冉冶, 王贵文, 赖锦, 等. 利用测井交会图法定量表征致密油储层成岩相——以鄂尔多斯盆地华池地区长7致密油储层为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2016, 34(4): 694-706.
[11] 李国欣, 赵太平, 石玉江, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地马家沟组碳酸盐岩储层成岩相测井识别评价[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(10): 1141-1154.
[12] 夏志远, 刘占国, 李森明, 等. 岩盐成因与发育模式——以柴达木盆地英西地区古近系下干柴沟组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(1): 54-65.
[13] 张津宁, 张金功, 杨乾政, 等. 柴达木盆地西部膏盐岩发育特征与成因分析[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 46(6): 867-875.
[14] 苏妮娜, 金振奎, 宋璠, 等. 柴达木盆地古近系沉积相研究[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(3): 2-7.
[15] 黄成刚, 关新, 倪祥龙, 等. 柴达木盆地英西地区E32咸化湖盆白云岩储集层特征及发育主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2): 220-229.
[16] 李海, 汤达祯, 许浩, 等. 柴达木盆地獅子沟油田古近系异常高压成[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2013, 32(3): 29-34.
[17] 韩天恒. 英雄岭构造带低-高构造格局、断裂特征及与油气藏关系研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西北大学, 2016.
[18] 刘军, 刘成林, 董清源, 等. 柴达木盆地西部地区古近系-新近系天然气成藏期次研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(5): 127-134.
[19] 代全齐, 罗群, 张晨, 等. 基于核磁共振新参数的致密油砂岩储层孔隙结构特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(7): 887-897.
[20] 张响响, 邹才能, 陶士振, 等. 四川盆地广安地区上三叠统须家河组四段低孔渗砂岩成岩相类型划分及半定量评价[J]. 沉积学报, 2010, 28(1): 50-57.
[21] 邹才能, 陶士振, 周慧, 等. 成岩相的形成、分类与定量评价方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(5): 526-540.
[22] 王峰, 陈蓉, 田景春, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长4 + 5油层组致密砂岩储层成岩作用及成岩相[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(2): 199-206.
[23] Kleipool, L.M., Reijmer, J.G., Badenas, B. and Aurell, M. (2015) Variations in Petrophysical Properties along a Mixed Siliciclastic Carbonate Ramp (Upper Jurassic, Ricla, NE Spain). Marine and Petroleum Geology, 68, 158-177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 刘宝珺, 张锦泉. 沉积成岩作用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1992: 76-200.
[25] Seyedmehdi, Z., George, A.D. and Tucker, M.E. (2016) Sequence Development of a Latest Devonian-Tournaisian Distally-Steepened Mixed Carbonate-Siliciclastic Ramp, Canning Basin, Australia. Sedimentary Geology, 333, 164-183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef