软煤层逐级跃升水力压裂增渗技术研究
Study on Increasing Permeability of Soft Coal Seams by Step-by-Step Hydraulic Fracturing Technology
DOI: 10.12677/ME.2019.73040, PDF,    国家科技经费支持
作者: 乔 伟*, 张 群:中煤科工集团重庆研究院有限公司,重庆;瓦斯灾害监控与应急技术国家重点实验室,重庆
关键词: 高瓦斯逐级水力压裂裂隙扩展煤层增渗High Gas Step by Step Hydraulic Fracturing Fracture Propagation Coal Seam Permeability Enhancement
摘要: 水力压裂作为一种高效瓦斯抽采及瓦斯灾害防治技术得到了广泛的应用,现有的水力压裂技术大多采用高压脉冲或者低压水力对钻孔周围煤体进行压裂。这种方式在硬煤层中能够取得较好的效果,但在软煤层中,大流量的高压水很大程度上破坏钻孔周围煤岩体,致使软煤层在次生裂隙没有完全充分发育的情况下就遭到破坏、甚至闭合,致使水力压裂效果不显著,甚至造成煤体压出或突出危险。针对软煤层若采用低压水力压裂,一方面影响范围小,不容易形成压差,裂隙无法充分扩展;另一方面,压裂施工时间较长,用水量较大,存在排水困难,增加瓦斯治理成本和难度。因此,针对软煤层,如何有效使煤岩体在裂隙充分发育的情况下得到逐步延伸,首次提出了一种煤层逐级跃升水力压裂增渗方法。
Abstract: Hydraulic fracturing has been widely used as a high-efficiency gas extraction and gas disaster prevention technology. The existing hydraulic fracturing technology mostly uses high-pressure pulse or low-pressure hydraulic to fracturing the coal around the borehole. This method can achieve good results in hard coal seam, but in soft coal seam, high-pressure water with large flow largely destroys the coal and rock mass around the borehole, which makes the soft coal seam destroyed or closed when the secondary cracks are not fully developed. Therefore, the application effect of hydraulic fracturing in soft coal seam is not significant, and even easy to cause the risk of coal extrusion or outburst. In the application of low-pressure hydraulic fracturing technology in soft coal seam, there are two main problems: one is that the influence scope is small, it is not easy to form differential pressure, and the fracture cannot be fully expanded; the other is that the fracturing construction time is long, the water consumption is large, and the drainage is difficult, which increases the cost and difficulty of gas control. On this issue, aimed at how to effectively extend the coal and rock mass in soft coal seam under the condition of fully developed cracks, a method of step-by-step jump fracturing hydraulic pressure and increasing coal seam permeability is put forward for the first time.
文章引用:乔伟, 张群. 软煤层逐级跃升水力压裂增渗技术研究[J]. 矿山工程, 2019, 7(3): 289-295. https://doi.org/10.12677/ME.2019.73040

参考文献

[1] 章敏, 王星华, 汪优, 等. Herschel-Bulkley浆液在裂隙中的扩散规律研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(5): 815-820.
[2] 李宗福, 孙大发, 陈久福, 等. 水力压裂-水力割缝联合增透技术应用[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2015, 43(10): 72-76.
[3] 卢义玉, 葛兆龙, 李晓红, 等. 脉冲射流割缝技术在石门揭煤中的应用研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2010, 39(1): 55-58+69.
[4] 孙东玲, 胡千庭, 苗法田. 煤与瓦斯突出过程中煤-瓦斯两相流的运动状态[J]. 煤炭学报, 2012, 37(3): 452-458.
[5] Creedy, D. and Tilley, H. (2003) Coalbed Methane Extraction and Utilization. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 217, 19-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Perkins, T.K. and Kern, L.R. (1961) Width of Hydraulic Fracture. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 13, 937-949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 李亭, 杨琦, 陈万钢, 等. 煤层气压裂综合滤失系数的影响因素评价[J]. 煤炭科学与技术, 2013, 41(3): 81-83.
[8] 张小东, 张鹏, 刘浩, 等. 高煤级煤储层水力压裂裂缝扩展模型研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2013, 42(4): 574-579.
[9] 王春光, 张东旭. 深部煤矿开采瓦斯综合治理技术研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2013, 41(8): 11-14.
[10] 阳友奎, 肖长富. 水力压裂裂缝形态与缝内压力分布[J]. 重庆大学学报(自然科学版), 1995, 18(3): 20-26.
[11] 许露露, 崔金榜, 黄赛鹏, 等. 煤层气储层水力压裂裂缝扩展模型分析及应用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2014, 39(10): 2068-2074.
[12] 欧阳进武, 张贵金, 刘杰. 劈裂灌浆扩散机理研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(7): 1328-1335.
[13] 林柏泉, 孟凡伟, 张海宾. 基于区域瓦斯治理的钻割抽一体化技术及应用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2011, 36(1): 75-79.
[14] Osorio, J.G., Chen, H.-Y. and Teufel, L.W. (1997) Numerical Simulation of Coupled Fluid-Flow/Geomechanical Behavior of Tight Gas Reservoirs with Stress Sensitive Permeability. Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 30 August-3 September 1997, 1-15.
[15] 徐刚, 彭苏萍, 邓绪彪. 煤层气井水力压裂压力曲线分析模型及应用[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2011, 40(2): 174-178.
[16] 沈春明, 林柏泉, 吴海进. 高压水射流割缝及其对煤体透气性的影响[J]. 煤炭学报, 2011, 36(12): 2058-2063.