密度等级对泡沫混凝土孔结构及力学性能的影响
Effect of Density Grade on Pore Structure and Mechanical Properties of Foamed Concrete
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2019.86128, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 徐茜茜, 袁化强:山东大学齐鲁交通学院,山东 济南;张 欣:济南市公路管理局,山东 济南;王 凯:齐鲁交通发展集团,山东 济南;徐 润:山东省交通规划设计院,山东 济南
关键词: 泡沫混凝土孔结构抗压强度抗劈裂抗拉强度弹性模量Foamed Concrete Pore Structure Compressive Strength Splitting Tensile Strength Elastic Modulus
摘要: 泡沫混凝土的性能受其湿密度等级影响较大,此文利用扫描电子显微镜和图像分析软件Image Pro Plus分析了不同湿密度等级泡沫混凝土内部孔结构特征,研究了密度等级对泡沫混凝土力学性能和路用性能加州承载比(CBR)的影响规律。研究结果表明:泡沫混凝土内部气孔分布均匀,且基本为独立不连通的球形孔,随着湿密度增大,气孔的面密度减小,并且减少规律基本符合线性关系;泡沫混凝土无侧限抗压强度、劈裂抗拉强度和弹性模量均随着湿密度增加而增大;四种不同湿密度的混凝土7 d CBR值均高于100%,具有很强的抵抗局部变形能力。泡沫混凝土的抗压强度与其劈裂抗拉强度、弹性模量和CBR值具有良好的线性相关性。
Abstract: The performance of foamed concrete is greatly affected by its wet density grade. In this paper, the pore structure characteristics of foamed concrete with different wet density grades are analyzed by means of scanning electron microscope and image analysis software Image Pro Plus. The influence of density grade on the mechanical properties and California bearing ratio of foamed concrete is studied. The results show that the distribution of pores in the foamed concrete is uniform, and most of them are independent and disconnected spherical pores. With the increase of wet density, the surface density of the pores decreases, and the reduction law basically conforms to the linear relationship. The unconfined compressive strength, splitting tensile strength and elastic modulus of the foamed concrete increase with the increase of wet density. The CBR values of the foamed concrete with different wet densities are all higher than 100% at the age of 7 days, which means strong resistance to deformation. The compressive strength of foamed concrete has a good linear correlation with its splitting tensile strength, elastic modulus and CBR value.
文章引用:徐茜茜, 张欣, 王凯, 徐润, 袁化强. 密度等级对泡沫混凝土孔结构及力学性能的影响[J]. 土木工程, 2019, 8(6): 1094-1102. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2019.86128

参考文献

[1] 李硕, 杨军宏. 泡沫混凝土在高速公路改扩建工程中的应用[J]. 公路交通科技, 2018, 35(S1): 5-10.
[2] 戴智敏. 气泡混合轻质土的应用技术研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2008.
[3] 蔡力, 陈忠平, 吴立坚. 气泡混合轻质土的主要力学特性及应用综述[J]. 公路交通科技, 2005, 22(12): 71-74.
[4] 陈忠平, 王树林. 气泡混合轻质土及其应用综述[J]. 中外公路, 2003, 23(5): 117-120.
[5] 肖礼经. 泡沫水泥轻质土在公路建设中的应用与研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2003.
[6] 陈忠平. 气泡混合轻质填土新技术[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2004.
[7] 刘楷. 水泥、地聚合物泡沫混凝土工程特性试验研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 东南大学, 2015.
[8] Kearsley, E.P. and Wainwright, P.J. (2001) The Effect of High Fly Ash Content on the Compressive Strength of Foamed Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 31, 105-112.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Kearsley, E.P. and Wainwright, P.J. (2001) Porosity and Permeability of Foamed Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 31, 805-812.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Kearsley, E.P. and Wainwright, P.J. (2002) The Effect of Porosity on the Strength of Foamed Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 32, 233-239.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Nambiar, E.K.K. and Ramamurthy, K. (2008) Fresh State Char-acteristics of Foam Concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 20, 111-117.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Nambiar, E.K.K. and Ramamurthy, K. (2006) Influence of Filler Type on the Properties of Foam Concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 28, 475-480.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Nambiar, E.K.K. and Ramamurthy, K. (2006) Models Relating Mixture Composition to the Density and Strength of Foam Concrete Using Response Surface Methodology. Cement and Concrete Composites, 28, 752-760.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Nambiar, E.K.K. and Ramamurthy, K. (2007) Sorption Char-acteristics of Foam Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 37, 1341-1347.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Nambiar, E.K.K. and Ramamurthy, K. (2008) Models for Strength Prediction of Foam Concrete. Materials and Structures, 41, 247-254.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 张磊蕾. 泡沫混凝土的组成与性能、微结构的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国建筑材料科学研究总院, 2011.
[17] 张磊蕾, 王武祥. 水料比对泡沫混凝土孔结构和性能的影响研究[J]. 建材技术与应用, 2011(5): 1-3.
[18] 张旭, 王武祥. 超轻泡沫混凝土孔结构和抗压强度的相关性研究[J]. 墙材革新与建筑节能, 2019, 243(2): 21-25.
[19] 张旭, 王武祥, 杨鼎宜, 等. 泡沫混凝土孔结构特征及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 混凝土与水泥制品, 2018(7): 63-68.