命名任务下汉字家族效应:语音总体激活与侧抑制
Chinese Character Family Effect in Naming Task: The Roles of Global Activation of Phonology and Lateral Inhibition
摘要: 本研究以大学生为被试,通过两个快速命名实验,考察声旁家族和笔画家族的家族大小效应,以揭示命名任务下的汉字家族效应。结果发现:声旁大家族出现了促进效应,笔画大家族出现了抑制效应。研究结果说明:命名任务下的声旁家族与笔画家族效应不同;声旁家族促进效应与其语音激活有关,而笔画家族抑制效应与其强势的侧抑制有关;命名任务下的汉字家族效应是促进还是抑制可能取决于语音总体激活与侧抑制的共同作用。
Abstract: In this study, college students were used as subjects to examine the family size effects of the phonetic-radical family and the stroke family through two rapid naming experiments to reveal the Chinese character family effect in the naming task. It was found that there was a promoting effect in the large family of phonetic-radical, and the inhibitory effect appeared in the large family of stroke. The results show that the phonetic-radical family and the stroke family effect are different in the naming task; the phonetic-radical family promotion effect is related to its global activation of phonology, while the stroke family effect is related to the strong lateral inhibition. The Chinese character family effect in the naming task is promotion or inhibition which depends on the combined effect of the global activation of phonology and the lateral inhibition.
文章引用:周晓艺, 李丽军, 章勇, 苗俊洁, 王权红 (2019). 命名任务下汉字家族效应:语音总体激活与侧抑制. 心理学进展, 9(8), 1517-1527. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.98185

参考文献

[1] (1986). 现代汉语频率词典. 北京: 北京语言学院出版社.
[2] 毕鸿燕, 胡伟, 翁旭初(2006). 汉语形声字声旁家族大小对整字发音的影响. 心理学报, 38(6), 791-797.
[3] 姜敏敏, 张积家, 李虎(2011). 声旁家族大小和高频同声旁字对汉字命名的影响. 心理学探新, 31(5), 434-439.
[4] 李丽军(2017). 汉字家族效应: 语音总体激活与侧抑制机制. 硕士论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[5] 毛媛, 董静, 王权红(2017). 汉字正字法家族效应的ERP研究. 心理科学, 40(3), 534-539.
[6] 倪海曙(1982). 现代汉字形声字字汇. 北京: 语文出版社.
[7] 王敬欣, 李琳, 李莎, 谢芳, 常敏, 张阔(2015). 正字法邻近字在汉字识别过程中的抑制效应. 心理学探新, 35(6), 493-498.
[8] 王协顺, 吴岩, 赵思敏, 等(2016). 形旁和声旁在形声字识别中的作用. 心理学报, 48(2), 130-140.
[9] 张积家, 姜敏敏(2008). 形旁家族、声旁家族和高频同声旁字对形声字识别的影响. 心理学报, 40(9), 947-960.
[10] 张亚旭, 周晓林, 舒华, 刑红兵(2003). 汉字识别中声旁与整字语音激活的相对优势. 北京大学学报, 1(39), 126-133.
[11] Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and Neighborhood Effects on Lexical Access: Activation or Search? Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 15, 802-814.[CrossRef
[12] Andrews, S. (1997). The Effect of Orthographic Similarity on Lexical Retrieval: Resolving Neighborhood Conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.[CrossRef
[13] Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the Internal Lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[14] Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C. et al. (2001). DRC: A Dual Route Cascaded Model of Visual Word Recognition and Reading Aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.[CrossRef
[15] Ding, G., Peng, D., & Taft, M. (2004). The Nature of the Mental Representation of Radicals in Chinese: A Priming Study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 530-539.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Dong, J., Yang, S., & Wang, Q. (2015). N400-Like Effect of Stroke-Based Neighborhood Size in Chinese Characters. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 35, 120-134.[CrossRef
[17] Honorof, D. N., & Feldman, L. B. (2006). The Chinese Character in Psycholinguistic Research: Form, Structure, and Reader, In P. Li, L. H. Tan, E. Bates, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 195-208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[CrossRef
[18] Lavidor, M., Johnston, R., & Snowling, M. J. (2006). When Phonology Fails: Orthographic Neighbourhood Effects in Dyslexia. Brain and Language, 96, 318-329.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An Interactive Activation Model of Context Effects in Letter Perception: I. An Account of Basic Findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.[CrossRef
[20] Samson, D, & Pillon, A. (2004). Orthographic Neighborhood and Concreteness Effects in the Lexical Decision Task. Brain and Language, 91, 252-264.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Wang, J., Tian, J., Han, W., Liversedge, S. P., & Paterson, K. B. (2014). Inhibitory Stroke Neighbour Priming in Character Recognition and Reading in Chinese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2149-2171.[CrossRef] [PubMed]