身体经验对儿童概念习得的影响：具身认知的视角
The Influence of Physical Experience on Children’s Conceptual Acquisition: Embodied Cognition View
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.98186, PDF,   
作者: 陈银芳：广州大学教育学院，广东 广州；刘 钊：中山大学新华学院，广东 广州
关键词: 具身认知理论；感觉运动经验；概念习得；Embodied Cognition； Sensory Motor Experience； Conceptual Acquisition
摘要: 感觉运动经验是认知加工的重要基础，直接影响儿童对概念的获取。文章在回顾了传统认知理论和具身认知理论区别的基础上，针对感觉运动系统的在儿童语言习得中的作用进行了分析；然后，系统梳理了感觉运动经验与儿童概念习得、语言加工等的相关研究，得出环境、感知觉、行为是儿童初期获得概念进行识别的重要组成部分，儿童早期感觉运动经验对后期语言发展具有重要意义。最后指出未来研究需要提高感觉运动系统与儿童语言加工的信效度；对缺乏感觉运动经验的儿童如何有效促进概念获得等问题需进一步深入研究。
Abstract: Sensory and motor experience is very important in cognitive processing, which directly affects children’s acquisition of concepts. Based on the reviewing of the differences between traditional cognitive theory and embodied cognitive theory, the paper analyzes the role of sensory and motor system in children’s language processing. Then it aims to generalize the developments by considering empirical literature on the relationship between sensory and motor experience and children’s concept acquisition and language processing. Results highlight that environment, perception and behavior are important components of children’s early concept recognition. It also emphasizes the experience of sensory movement in early years is of great significance to the development of language later. Finally, empirical and methodological implications are considered for future research, including to improve the reliability and validity of sensory motor system and children's language processing, and to examine how to effectively promote the acquisition of concepts in children who are lack of sensory and motor experience.
文章引用：陈银芳, 刘钊 (2019). 身体经验对儿童概念习得的影响：具身认知的视角. 心理学进展, 9(8), 1528-1534. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.98186

参考文献

[1] 范琪, 叶浩生(2014). 具身认知与具身隐喻——认知的具身转向及隐喻认知功能探析. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), (3), 117-122.
[2] 任琳, 丁道群, 黎晓丹, 梁敏响(2018). 手势促进语言的理解与学习: 具身认知的视角. 心理研究, (2), 119-123.
[3] 苏得权, 钟元, 曾红, 叶浩生(2013). 汉语动作成语语义理解激活脑区及其具身效应: 来自fMRI的证据. 心理学报, 45(11), 1187-1199.
[4] 叶浩生(2013). 认知与身体: 理论心理学的视角. 心理学报, 45(4), 481-488.
[5] 叶浩生(2015). 心理学与身体: 经典传统与现代取向. 心理学探新, (4), 291-298.
[6] 叶浩生(2017). 具身认知——原理与应用. 北京: 商务印书馆.
[7] Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.[CrossRef] 
[8] Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding Conceptual Knowledge in Modality-Specific Systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 84-91.[CrossRef] 
[9] Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. (2010). Embodied Cognition and Beyond: Acting and Sensing the Body. Neuropsychologia, 48, 763-773.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C. S., & Suwalsky, J. T. D. (2013). Physically Developed and Exploratory Young Infants Contribute to Their Own Long-Term Academic Achievement. Psychological Science, 24, 1906-1917.
[11] Engel, A. K., Maye, A., Kurthen, M., & Konig, P. (2013). Where’s the Action? The Pragmatic Turn in Cognitive Science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 202-209.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What Memory Is for. Behavior and Brain Science, 20, 1-55.[CrossRef] 
[13] Glenberg, A. M., & Arthur, M. (2015). Few Believe the World Is Flat: How Embodiment Is Changing the Scientific Understanding of Cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 165-171.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Ac-tion-Based Language: A Theory of Language Acquisition, Comprehension, and Production. Cortex, 48, 905-922.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Hansen, D., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2012). The Influence of Print Exposure on the Body-Object Interaction Effect in Visual Word Recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 113.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Hargreaves, I. S., Leonard, G. A., Pexman, P. M., Pittman, D. J., Siakaluk, P. D., & Goodyear, B. G. (2012). The Neural Correlates of the Body-Object Interaction Effect in Semantic Processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 22.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Heard, A., Madan, C. R., Protzner, A. B., & Pexman, P. M. (2018). Getting a Grip on Sensorimotor Effects in Lexical-Semantic Processing. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 1-13.
[18] Inkster, M., Wellsby, M., Lloyd, E., & Pexman, P. M. (2016). Development of Embodied Word Meanings: Sensorimotor Effects in Children’s Lexical Processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 317.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] James, K. H., & Maouene, J. (2009). Auditory Verb Perception Recruits Motor Systems in the Developing Brain: An fMRI Investigation. Developmental Science, 12, F26-F34.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] James, K. H., Jones, S. S., Smith, L. B., & Swain, S. N. (2014). Young Children’s Self-Generated Object Views and Object Recognition. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, 393-401.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Kiefer, M., & Trumpp, N. M. (2012). Embodiment Theory and Education: The Foundations of Cognition in Perception and Action. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1, 15-20.[CrossRef] 
[22] Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The Representation of Abstract Words: Why Emotion Matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 14-34.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Laakso, A. (2011). Embodiment and Development in Cognitive Science. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 15, 409-425.
[24] Marley, S. C., Levin, J. R., & Glenberg, A. M. (2010). What Cognitive Benefits Does an Activity-Based Reading Strategy Afford Young Native American Readers? The Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 395-417.[CrossRef] 
[25] Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: Norton & Co.[CrossRef] 
[26] Pulvermuller, F., & Garagnani, M. (2014). From Sensorimotor Learning to Memory Cells in Prefrontal and Temporal Association Cortex: A Neurocomputational Study of Disembodiment. Cortex, 57, 1-21.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Aguilera, L., Owen, W. J., & Sears, C. R. (2008). Evidence for the Activation of Sensorimotor Information during Visual Word Recognition: The Body-Object Interaction Effect. Cognition, 106, 433-443.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Smith, L. B. (2005). Action Alters Shape Categories. Cognitive Science, 29, 665-679.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Smith, L. B. (2013). It’s All Connected: Pathways in Visual Object Recognition and Early Noun Learning. American Psychologist, 68, 618-629.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Smith, L. B., & Samuelson, L. (2010). Objects in Space and Mind: From Reaching to Words. In K. Mix, L. B. Smith, & M. Gasser (Eds.), Thinking through Space: Spatial Foundations of Language and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[31] Smith, L. B., Maouene, J., & Hidaka, S. (2007). The Body and Children’s Word Learning. In J. M. Plumert, & J. P. Spencer (Eds.), The Emerging Spatial Mind (pp. 168-192). New York: Oxford University Press.[CrossRef] 
[32] Tare, M., Chiong, C., Ganea, P., & DeLoache, J. (2010). Less Is More: How Manipulative Features Affect Children’s Learning from Picture Books. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 395-400.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Tillotson, S. M., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2008). Body-Object Interaction Ratings for 1,618 Monosyllabic Nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 1075-1078.[CrossRef] 
[34] Wellsby, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2014). The Influence of Bodily Experience on Children’s Language Processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 425-441.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Wellsby, M., Siakaluk, P. D., Owen, W. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2011). Embodied Semantic Processing: The Body-Object Interaction Effect in a Non-Manual Task. Language and Cognition, 3, 1-14.[CrossRef] 
[36] Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2016). Multiple Sensory-Motor Pathways Lead to Coordinated Visual Attention. Cognitive Science, 41, 5-31.[CrossRef] [PubMed]