从“目的论”的角度浅析《内经素问》中“癫”病翻译
A Brief Analysis of the Translation of Dianbing (Epilepsy) in Neijing from the Perspective of Skopos Theory
摘要:
本文从“目的论”的角度，对《内经素问》中“癫”病翻译进行探讨研究。文章应用“目的论”的基本理论，结合《内经》中典型描述癫病的句子，以及文树德、李照国、吴连胜三位对“癫”病翻译不同的译本，分析个中缘由和翻译得失。希望可以从目的论的角度来研究中医翻译，为中医文化传播交流寻找新的视角。
Abstract:
Based on the Skopos Theory, this paper studies the translation of Dianbing (epilepsy) in the clas-sical Neijing. The paper applies basic Skopos Theory to analyze different translation versions of Dianbing (epilepsy) by Paul Unschuld, Li Zhaoguo, and Wu Liansheng, hoping we can probe into the TCM translation from the perspective of Skopos Theory and find new visions for TCM culture communication.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Vermeer, H.J. (1989) Skopos and Commussion in Translational Action. In: Chesterman, A., Vinay, J.P. and Darbelnet, J., Eds., Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation (Translated and Edited by Juan, C.S. and Hamel, M.J.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
|
|
[2]
|
Vermeer, H.J. (1987) What Does It Mean to Translate? Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13.
|
|
[3]
|
Nord, C. (1997) A Functional Typology of Translations. In: Anna, T., Ed., Text Typology and Translation, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
张沉香. 功能目的理论与应用翻译研究[M]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学出版社, 2008: 46.
|
|
[5]
|
吴连胜, 吴奇. Yellow Emperor’s Canon of Internal Medicine [M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1997.
|
|
[6]
|
李照国. 大中华文库汉英对照黄帝内经素问[M]. 西安: 世界图书出版公司, 2005.
|
|
[7]
|
Unschuld, P.U. (2011) Huang Di Nei Jing Su Wen: An Annotated Translation of Huangdi’s Inner Classic-Basic Questions. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
|
|
[8]
|
王元勋. “西医临床学基础”[M]. 北京: 中国中医药出版社, 2009.
|
|
[9]
|
“朗文当代高级英语辞典”[M]. 第6版. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2018.
|
|
[10]
|
刘默. “证治百问”[M]. 清. 上海: 第二军医大出版社, 2005.
|
|
[11]
|
王冰. “注黄帝内经素间”[M]. 唐. 北京: 中华书局, 1995.
|
|
[12]
|
谢观. “中国医学大辞典”[M]. 天津: 天津科学技术出版社, 1998.
|
|
[13]
|
“辞源”[M]. 第3版. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2015.
|
|
[14]
|
“现代汉语大词典”[M]. 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 2010.
|