串联式锚板抗拔承载力及影响因素
Analysis of the Tensile Properties and Influencing Factors of Tandem Double Anchored Plates
摘要: 基于室内模型试验对比研究了单锚板和串联式双锚板的拉拔性状。基于FLAC 3D有限差分软件,建立了串联式双锚板的拉拔性能数值模拟模型,获得了上拔力–上拔位移关系曲线,同时,对其影响因素进行了探讨。研究结果表明:1) 串联式双锚板的承载能力远大于单锚板。无论是单锚板或是串联式双锚板,上拔力–上拔位移关系的典型曲线为双曲线,且面积相同的圆形锚板的承载力远大于方形锚板。2) 土的强度参数对串联式双锚板上拔力–上拔位移关系影响明显。3) 对于串联式双锚板,在下锚板埋设深度一定,且为深埋锚板的条件下,土的重度对上拔力–上拔位移关系影响很小,同时,双锚板之间存在临界间距,当锚板间距大于临界间距,随着上锚板埋深增大,串联式双锚板的承载力增加。
Abstract: In this paper, the drawing properties of single anchor plate and tandem double anchor plate are compared based on the indoor model experiment. The numerical simulation model for the pull-out property of the tandem double anchor plate is established by using FLAC 3D finite difference nu-merical simulation analysis software, and the relationship curve between the uplift force and uplift displacement is obtained. At the same time, the influencing factors are discussed. The results show that: 1) The carrying capacity of the tandem double anchored plate is much higher than that of the single anchored plate. The typical curve of the relationship between the uplift force and uplift displacement is hyperbolic, and the bearing capacity of circular anchor plates with the same area is much larger than that of square anchor plates. 2) Soil strength parameters have obvious influence on the relationship between uplift force and uplift displacement of the tandem double-anchored plates. 3) For the tandem double anchoring plates, under the condition that the buried depth of the lower anchoring plates is constant and the depth of the anchoring plates is deep; the unit weight of soil has little effect on the relationship between uplift force and uplift displacement; at the same time, tandem double anchor plate exists critical spacing. The anchor plate spacing is greater than the critical spacing, as on the anchor plate depth increases, tandem double anchor plate bearing capacity increases.
文章引用:刘杰, 刘学慧, 罗鑫. 串联式锚板抗拔承载力及影响因素[J]. 力学研究, 2019, 8(3): 204-212. https://doi.org/10.12677/IJM.2019.83023

参考文献

[1] 丁佩民, 肖志斌, 张其林. 砂土中锚板抗拔承载力研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2003, 24(5): 82-91+97.
[2] 丁佩民, 张其林, 肖志斌. 砂土中锚板荷载–位移特性研究及上拔位移计算[J]. 土木工程学报, 2004, 37(6): 52-59+86+100.
[3] 王栋, 胡玉霞, 宋振河. 均质黏土中圆形平板锚的抗拉承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(6): 1242-1246.
[4] 于龙, 刘君, 孔宪京. 锚板在正常固结黏土中的承载力[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(7): 1427-1434.
[5] 刘君, 于龙, 吴利玲, 孔宪京. 饱和黏土中倾斜圆形锚板承载力分析[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2008, 48(2): 229-234.
[6] 舒恒, 但汉波. 基于Hill稳定条件的条形锚板抗拔承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(10): 3313-3318.
[7] 黄茂松, 余生兵. 基于旋转块体集的深埋条形锚板上限分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(5): 685-692.
[8] 余生兵, 黄茂松. 基于组合块体集的浅埋条形锚板上限分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(5): 1049-1056.
[9] 黄茂松, 余生兵. 基于块体集上限法的砂土中条形锚板抗拔承载力分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(2): 201-207.
[10] 姚敬宇. 砂土中多节螺旋锚的抗拔破坏模型试验研究[J]. 工程建设, 2016, 48(7): 28-30.
[11] 解全一, 张宏博, 岳红亚, 马源, 李信. 锚定板极限承载力影响因素分析[J]. 公路, 2016, 61(7): 8-12.
[12] 中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司. 公路挡土墙设计与施工技术细则[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2008.