辅助生殖技术后早产的相关因素及其研究进展
Related Factors and Research Progress of Premature Birth after Assisted Reproductive Technology
摘要: 近年来,辅助生殖技术(ART)的迅速发展为许多不孕家庭带去希望,但是许多学者发现,经ART助孕的妇女发生早产的风险明显大于自然受孕的妇女。并且ART后早产的病因并不十分明确,通过阅读近年相关文献,发现多胎妊娠、不同的辅助生殖技术、胎膜早破、胎盘、子宫因素、女性不孕等方面是影响ART后早产的重要因素。本文就辅助生殖技术后早产的相关因素进行了综述,为降低ART后早产的发生提供更多依据。
Abstract: In recent years, the rapid development of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has brought hope to many infertile families, but many scholars have found that women who have been assisted by ART have a significantly higher risk of preterm birth than women who are naturally conceived. And the cause of premature delivery after ART is not very clear. By reading the relevant literature in recent years, it is found that multiple pregnancies, different assisted reproductive technologies, premature rupture of membranes, placenta, uterus factors, and female infertility are important factors affecting preterm birth after ART. This article reviews the related factors of premature birth in assisted reproductive technology, and provides more evidence for reducing the incidence of preterm birth after ART.
文章引用:赵慧文, 赵雪楠, 李红梅. 辅助生殖技术后早产的相关因素及其研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2019, 9(10): 1123-1128. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2019.910172

参考文献

[1] Zhang, J., Ding, Y. and Yu, L. (2015) Association of Assisted Reproductive Technology with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 13, 169-180.
[2] Giulia, B., Gluck, O., Mizrachi, Y. and Bar, J. (2016) A Comparison of Maternal and Perinatal Outcome between in Vitro Fertilization and Spontaneous Dichorion-ic-Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 30, 2974-2977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Dunietz, G.L., Holzman, C., Mckane, P., et al. (2015) As-sisted Reproductive Technology and the Risk of Preterm Birth among Primiparas. Fertility and Sterility, 103, 974-979.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Qin, J.B., Wang, H., Sheng, X., Xie, Q. and Gao, S. (2016) Assisted Reproductive Technology and Risk of Adverse Obstetric Outcomes in Dichorionic Twin Pregnan-cies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Fertility & Sterility, 105, 1180-1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 虞慧婷, 陈国武, 钱耐思. 上海2004-2015年辅助生殖技术婴儿不良出生结局分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2018, 34(1): 56-59.
[6] 谢幸, 孔北华, 段涛. 妇产科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫士出版社, 2018: 95-98.
[7] 杨学舟, 章汉旺. 辅助生殖技术妊娠后异常时限分娩相关因素分析[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2009, 18(12): 925-928.
[8] Kupka, M.S., Ferraretti, A.P., de Mouzon, J., et al. (2014) Assisted Repro-ductive Technology in Europe, 2010: Results Generated from European Registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction, 29, 2099-2113.
[9] Eum, J.H., Park, J.K., Kim, S.Y., et al. (2016) Clinical Outcomes of Single versus Double Blastocyst Transfer in Fresh and Vitrified-Warmed Cycles. Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine, 43, 164-168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Sundhararaj, U.M., Madne, M.V. and Biliangady, R. (2017) Single Blastocyst Transfer: The Key to Reduce Multiple Pregnancy Rates without Compromising the Live Birth Rate. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 10, 201-207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 洪焱, 黄绘, 骆荣. 选择性单囊胚移植在辅助生殖技术中的应用研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2019, 34(5): 1101-1103.
[12] Ishihara, O., Araki, R., Kuwahara, A., et al. (2014) Impact of Frozen-Thawed Single Blastocyst Transfer on Maternal and Neonatal Outcome: An Analysis of 277,042 Single Embryo Transfer Cycles from 2008 to 2010 in Japan. Fertility and Sterility, 101, 128-133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Zhao, J., Xu, B., Zhang, Q. and Li, Y.P. (2016) Which One Has a Better Obstetric and Perinatal Outcome in Singleton Pregnancy, IVF/ICSI or FET?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 14, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Chambers, G.M., Chughtai, A.A., Farquhar, C.M. and Wang, Y.A. (2015) Risk of Preterm Birth after Blastocyst Embryo Transfer: A Large Population Study Using Contemporary Registry Data from Australia and New Zealand. Fertility and Sterility, 104, 997-1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Bergh, C. (2016) Neonatal and Maternal Outcome after Blastocyst Transfer: A Population-Based Registry Study. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 214, 378.e1-378.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Martins, W.P., Nastri, C.O., Rienzi, L., et al. (2016) Obstetrical and Perinatal Outcomes Following Blastocyst Transfer Compared to Cleavage Transfer: A System-atic Review and Meta-Analysis. Human Reproduction, 31, 2561-2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Dar, S., Lazer, T., Shah, P.S. and Librach, C.L. (2014) Neonatal Outcomes among Singleton Births after Blastocyst versus Cleavage Stage Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Human Reproduction Update, 20, 439-448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Alviggi, C., Conforti, A., Carbone, I.F., et al. (2018) Influence of Cryopreservation on Perinatal Outcome after Blastocyst- vs Cleavage-Stage Embryo Transfer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 51, 54-63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 周灿权, 袁媛, 古芳. 重视辅助生殖技术对女性的近远期影响[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2018, 34(6): 577-580.
[20] 杨磊. 早产胎膜早破95例妊娠结局的临床分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2017, 33(6): 458-460.
[21] 李莹, 杨晓葵, 张为远. 辅助生殖技术妊娠和自然妊娠早产相关因素及早产儿结局临床分析[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科, 2016, 8(8): 41-44.
[22] 谢幸, 孔北华, 段涛. 妇产科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫士出版社, 2018: 195-198.
[23] Venetis, C.A., Papadopoulos, S.P., et al. (2014) Clinical Implications of Congenital Uterine Anomalies: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 29, 665-683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Ozgur, K., Bulut, H., Berkkanoglu, M. and Coetzee, K. (2017) Reproductive Outcomes of IVF Patients with Unicornuate Uteri. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 34, 312-318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] 胡玉琴, 刘迎春, 宋小敏. 先天性子宫畸形患者IVF/ICSI临床结局分析[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2018, 27(12): 51-55.
[26] 季小红, 乌兰, 苗治晶, 等. 极早期和早期早产并发症及早产儿结局分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2018, 34(8): 596-599.
[27] Pinborg, A., Ortoft, G., Loft, A., Rasmussen, S.C. and Ingerslev, H.J. (2015) Cervical Conization Doubles the Risk of Preterm and Very Preterm Birth in Assisted Reproductive Technology Twin Pregnancies. Human Reproduction, 30, 197-204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Mishra, V.V., Bandwal, P., Agarwal, R. and Aggarwal, R. (2017) Prevalence, Clinical and Laparoscopic Features of Endometriosis among Infertile Women. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 67, 208-212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Pérez-López, F.R., Villagrasa-Boli, P., et al. (2018) Association between Endometriosis and Preterm Birth in Women with Spontaneous Conception or Using Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Reproductive Sciences, 25, 311-319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Bryant-Greenwood, G.D., et al. (2010) Human Decidual Relaxin and Preterm Birth. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1041, 338-344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Papanikolaou, I.G., Ekaterini, D., George, D., et al. (2018) Abnormal Placentation: Current Evidence and Review of the Literature. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 228, 98-105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Vermey, B., Buchanan, A., Chambers, G., et al. (2019) Are Singleton Pregnancies after Assisted Reproduction Technology (ART) Associated with a Higher Risk of Placental Anomalies Compared with Non-ART Singleton Pregnancies? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BJOG: An In-ternational Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 126, 209-218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Kroener, L., Wang, E. and Pisarska, M. (2015) Predisposing Fac-tors to Abnormal First Trimester Placentation and the Impact on Fetal Outcomes. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 34, 27-35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Silver, R.M. (2015) Abnormal Placentation: Placenta Previa, Vasa Previa, and Placenta Accreta. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 126, 654-668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef