Cummins语言能力观对语用能力等级描述研究的启示
Cummins’s Views of Language Competence and Their Implications for the Level Description of Pragmatic Competence
摘要: 国内外有关二语语用能力研究的成果及文献已有很多，但对语用能力成分构建及等级描述的研究至今仍没有统一的解释模式或分析框架，这无疑影响了第二语言或外语教学质量的提高。本文通过对社会语言学家Cummins 提出的三种语言能力解释模式中折射出的语用能力等级意义及认知特征的分析研究，讨论Cummins的语言能力观对语用能力等级描述研究的作用与意义。
Abstract: Although there has been considerable research on L2 pragmatic competence both at home and abroad, its components and level description are still controversial, which hinders the improve-ment of second or foreign language instruction. With the analysis of level and cognitive features of pragmatic competence in Cummins’s models of language competence, this paper discusses the theoretical contribution of Cummins’s language competence to the level description of pragmatic competence.
文章引用：彭庆华. Cummins语言能力观对语用能力等级描述研究的启示[J]. 现代语言学, 2019, 7(5): 752-758. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2019.75100

参考文献

[1] Cummins, J. (1981) Bilingualism and Minority Language Children. OISE Press, Toronto.%%Cummins, J. (2008) BICS and CALP: Empirical and Theoretical Status of the Distinction. In: Street, B. and Hornberger, N.H., Eds., En-cyclopedia of Language and Education, 2nd Edition, Springer Science + Business Media LLC, New York, 71-83. %%Cummins, J. and Swain, M. (1986) Bilingualism in Education: Aspects of Theory, Research and Practice. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.%%Roever, C. (2011) Testing of Second Language Pragmatics: Past and Future. Language Testing, 28, 463-481. 关于语用能力构建的思考[C]//“语用学研究”第4辑. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2011.%%李民, 陈新仁. 国内外语用能力研究特点与趋势对比分析[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2018(2): 1-8.%%李清华. 二语语用能力: 从交际能力范式到互动能力范式[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2019(2): 15-21.%%Swaffar, J. (2006) Terminology and Its Discontents: Some Caveats about Communicative Competence. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 246-249. C. (2006) From Communicative Competence to Symbolic Competence. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 249-252. R. (2006) Reevaluating Communicative Competence as a Major Goal in Postsecondary Language Requirement Courses. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 252-255. E. and Duncan, G. (1999) ACTEL Performance Guidelines for K-12 Learners. Foreign Language Annals, 31, 479-491. A. (2003) Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics: Learning How to Do Things with Words in a Study Abroad Context. John Benjamins Publishing Co., Amsterdam. C. SOS: A Model of Lexical Pragmatics in English for Chinese-Speaking Learners[M]. 台湾: 台湾培生教育出版股份有限公司, 2009.%%Canale, M. and Swain, M. (1980) Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-17. L.F. (1990) Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford University Press, Oxford.%%黄国文. Chomsky的“语言能力”与Hymes的“交际能力”[J]. 外语教学与研究, 1991(2): 35-37.%%陈新仁. 新编语用学教程[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2009.%%俞理明, Elizabeth Yeoman, 韩建侠. 双语教育论——加拿大浸入式教育对我国高校双语教育的启示[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2009.%%Baker, C. (1993) Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, 139-140.%%Langacker, R. (2000) A Dynamic Usage-Based Model. In: Barlow, M. and Kemmer, S., Eds., Usage-Based Models of Language, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.%%Fauconnier, G. (2004) Pragmatics and Cognitive Linguistics. In: Horn, L.R. and Ward, G., Eds., The Handbook of Pragmatics, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Malden, MA.%%Evans, V. (2006) Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models and Meaning-Construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 491-534. I. (2008) Dueling Contexts: A Dynamic Model of Meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 385-406. 补缺假设与外语学习[J]. 外语学刊, 2003(1): 1-5. %%Taylor, J. Ten Lectures on Applied Cognitive Linguistics[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2007.%%张辉, 蔡辉. 认知语言学与关联理论的互补性[C]//熊学亮, 曲卫国, 主编. 语用学采撷. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007.%%孙亚. 语用和认知概论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008.%%冉永平, 张新红. 语用学纵横[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007.%%彭庆华. 语用能力: 外语教学的瓶颈[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]