多回路、不同电压等级电缆隧道电磁-热-流多物理场耦合仿真
Electromagnetic-Thermal-Flow Multi-Physics Field Coupling Simulation of Multi-Loop and Different Voltage Grade Cable Tunnel
DOI: 10.12677/SG.2019.95020, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 向 宇, 岳 浩:中国电力工程顾问集团中南电力设计院有限公司,湖北 武汉;梁家鸣, 刘 恒*, 李晋贤:重庆大学输配电装备及系统安全与新技术国家重点实验室,重庆
关键词: 电缆隧道有限元仿真电场温度多物理场Cable Tunnel Finite Element Electric Field Temperature Multi-Physics Field
摘要: 与普通直埋电缆、排管电缆等敷设相比,多回路不同电压等级电缆隧道敷设电缆的温度场计算相对较复杂。本文基于ANSYS有限元仿真软件,建立多回路电缆隧道电磁-热-流多物理场耦合模型,研究不同电压等级内电缆电场分布、温度场分布特性规律,并采用解析法对不同电压等级电缆电场分布进行了验证。结果表明:110 kV、220 kV、500 kV电缆绝缘最大场强分别为13.18/17.95/32.67 kV/cm;采用“一”字型敷设时,中间相电缆温度较两侧相高,采用“品”字型敷设时,其A相电缆导体温度较BC两相高。论文工作可为多回路不同电压等级电缆隧道敷设电缆载流量的计算提供参考。
Abstract: Compared with the laying of ordinary direct buried cables and drainage cables, the calculation of temperature field of cable laying in cable tunnels with different voltage grades in multiple circuits is relatively complicated. This paper, based on ANSYS finite element simulation software, estab-lishes a multi-loop cable tunnel electromagnetic-heat-flow multi-physical field coupling model, studies the characteristics of electric field distribution and temperature field distribution in cables with different voltage levels, and verifies the electric field distribution of cables with different volt-age levels with analytical method. The results show that the maximum insulation field strength of 110 kV, 220 kV and 500 kV cables is 13.18/17.95/32.67 kV/cm respectively. When the “line” shape is adopted, the temperature of the intermediate phase cable is higher than that of the two sides. When the “triangle” shape is adopted, the temperature of the A phase cable conductor is higher than B and C phases. The work of this paper can provide reference for the calculation of cable car-rying capacity in cable tunnel laying with different voltage levels in multiple circuits.
文章引用:向宇, 岳浩, 梁家鸣, 刘恒, 李晋贤. 多回路、不同电压等级电缆隧道电磁-热-流多物理场耦合仿真[J]. 智能电网, 2019, 9(5): 182-190. https://doi.org/10.12677/SG.2019.95020

参考文献

[1] 王有元, 陈仁刚, 陈伟根, 袁园. 电缆沟敷设方式下电缆载流量计算及其影响因素分析[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2010, 30(11): 24-29.
[2] 张洪麟, 唐军, 陈伟根, 王有元. 基于有限元法的地下电缆群温度场及载流量的仿真计算[J]. 高压电器, 2010, 46(2): 42-45.
[3] 郑雁翎, 王宁, 李洪杰, 张冠军. 电力电缆载流量计算的研究与发展[J]. 电线电缆, 2010(2): 4-9.
[4] Anders, G.J., Chaaban, M., Bedard, N. and Ganton, R.W.D. (2007) New Approach to Ampacity Evaluation of Cables in Ducts Using Finite Elemet Technique. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2, 969-975.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 孟凡凤, 李香龙, 徐燕飞, 梁永春, 李彦明, 李忠魁. 地下直埋电缆温度场和载流量的数值计算[J]. 绝缘材料, 2006, 39(4): 59-61.
[6] 梁永春. 高压电力电缆温度场和载流量评估研究动态[J]. 高电压技术, 2016, 42(4): 1142-1150.
[7] 李巍巍, 等. 隧道电缆载流量计算及其影响因素分析[J]. 电力科学与工程, 2017, 33(5): 55-59.
[8] 郑文坚. 空气敷设电缆热-流耦合场仿真及其参数研究[D]:[硕士学位论文]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2018.
[9] Del Pino Lopez, J.C. and Romero, P.C. (2011) Influence of Different Types of Magnetic Shields on the Thermal Behavior and Ampacity of Underground Power Cables. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 26, 2659-2667.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef