叠音品牌名称对不同性别大学生消费偏好的影响
The Effect of Repeated Two-Syllable Brand Name on the Consumption Preference of College Students in Different Genders
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.910205, PDF,   
作者: 王昕悦, 贾浩哲:首都师范大学心理学院,北京市“学习与认知”重点实验室,北京
关键词: 叠音品牌名称性别倾向产品类型消费偏好Two-Syllable Word Brand Name Gender Inclination Product Types Consumer Preference
摘要: 品牌名称是产品与消费者之间的纽带。有研究表明品牌名称能够影响顾客的购买决策行为,例如叠音品牌就可以通过婴儿图式对消费者的温暖知觉产生影响。我们的生活中有许多叠音品牌名称,如“娃哈哈”、“趣多多”、MIUMIU等。而消费者自身的偏好和个体差异也会影响产品在他们心中的形象。因此,研究不同消费群体对不同品牌名称的偏好具有重要实用价值。本研究通过问卷法对231名大学生施测,考察叠音品牌对不同性别大学生偏好的影响,并探究不同产品功能和不同性别倾向产品在其中发挥的作用。结果显示:大学生对非叠音产品的偏好要显著高于叠音产品;对于男性倾向产品和中性倾向产品,大学生消费者对于非叠音品牌名称的喜好程度显著高于叠音品牌名称。
Abstract: It is widely reported that the brand name is the bond between the products and the consumers. Some studies also have shown that the brand name can influence the customers’ purchase deci-sion-making behavior. For example, the repeated two-syllable brand name can influence the consumer’s warm perception according to the baby pattern. As is known to us, there are many repeated two-syllable brand names in our lives, such as “Wa Haha”, “Qu Duoduo”, MIUMIU, etc. Consumers' own preferences and individuals’ differences can also affect the image of products in their hearts. Therefore, it is of great practical value to study the preferences of different consumer groups for different brand names. Based on the reference of predecessors, this study adds the gender identity to the classification of product types, at the same time, the college students whose consumption behavior is very representative are selected. On this basis, the influence of gender factors on consumer preference was further considered, as well as different functions of the product types and different gender orientations of the product types in which to play a role. Therefore, 231 college students from different regions, different grades and different majors were recruited. The method of online testing was used to inform the participants that we would create a new brand, in order to control the interference of consumers’ stereotypes of the original brand and independent variables such as individual experience. The brand name selected in this experiment follows the virtual brand name used by predecessors to investigate the influence of overlapping brand on the consumption preference of college students of different genders. Finally, the recovery data were screened, and the data of 8 subjects that did not meet the requirements such as missing answers and wrong answers were deleted. Finally, 223 effective subjects remained, including 108 males and 115 females. Finally, the recovery data was screened and 8 test subjects who did not meet the requirements, such as missing answers and wrong answers, were deleted. Finally, 223 valid subjects were included in the analysis, including 108 males and 115 females. The results show that: firstly, compared with female college students, male college students prefer male-oriented products; compared with male college students, female college students prefer female-oriented products, which also verifies the effectiveness of gender-specific classification of products according to gender attributes before the trial test; secondly, the preference of college students for neutral products is significantly greater than that for male products, while the preference for male products and neutral products is not significantly different from that of female products. Finally, the preference of college students for repeated two-syllable brand name is significantly higher than that for non-repeated two-syllable products. And for the male-oriented product and the neutral-oriented product, the college student’s preference for the non-repeated two-syllable products is significantly higher than the repeated two-syllable brand name. This also gives the enterprise marketing a series of inspirations, that is, the repeated two-syllable brand name does affect the consumption preferences of college students, but the impact is very limited compared to children’s products. Therefore, enterprises should pay attention to the functional characteristics, positioning and main consumer characteristics of products before considering the overlapping rhetoric into the brand name.
文章引用:王昕悦, 贾浩哲 (2019). 叠音品牌名称对不同性别大学生消费偏好的影响. 心理学进展, 9(10), 1692-1699. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.910205

参考文献

[1] 金庭栋, 周洁如(2015). 品牌名称对顾客购买决策行为的影响研究. 科技管理研究, 23(1), 147-149, 152.
[2] 李津竹(2015). 韩国偶像剧男性气质变迁研究. 硕士学位论文, 大连: 辽宁师范大学.
[3] 孙瑾, 张红霞(2012). 品牌名称暗示性对消费者决策选择的影响: 认知需要和专业化水平的调节作用. 心理学报, 44(5), 698-710.
[4] 魏华, 汪涛, 周宗奎, 冯文婷, 丁倩(2016). 叠音品牌名称对消费者知觉和偏好的影响. 心理学报, 48(11), 1479-1488.
[5] 许政援(1996). 三岁前儿童语言发展的研究和有关的理论问题. 心理发展与教育, 12(3), 1-11.
[6] 许政援, 郭小朝(1992). 11-14个月儿童的语言获得——成人的言语教授和儿童的模仿学习. 心理学报, (2), 148-157.
[7] 杨旭宗(2018). ABA式品牌名称对消费者知觉和偏好的影响研究. 硕士学位论文, 贵阳: 贵州师范大学.
[8] 姚卿, 陈荣, 段苏桓(2013). 产品类型对购物冲量效应的调节作用分析. 心理学报, 45(2), 206-216.
[9] 殷志平(2011). 中外企业汉语品牌命名的现状与趋势: 语言学视角分析. 营销科学学报, 7(2), 132-147.
[10] 银成钺, 陈艺妮(2012). 反性别刻板印象代言人广告效果的实验研究——消费者性别角色和产品性别特质的影响. 南开管理评论, 15(5), 95-104.
[11] 余明阳, 舒咏平(2002). 论品牌传播. 国际新闻界, No. 3, 63-68.
[12] 周有斌(2012). 叠音人名的考察与分析. 语言文字应用, No. 4, 48-55.
[13] 左海霞, 姚喜明(2006). 修辞视角下的网络语言. 外语电化教学, No. 1, 27-31.
[14] Argo, J. J., Popa, M., & Smith, M. C. (2013). The Sound of Brands. Journal of Marketing A Quarterly Publication of the American Marketing Association, 74, 97-109.[CrossRef
[15] Bem, S. L. (1977). On the Utility of Alternative Procedures for Assessing Psychological Androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196-205.[CrossRef
[16] Berger, J., & Ward, M. (2010). Subtle Signals of Inconspicuous Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 555-569.[CrossRef
[17] Berman, & Phyllis, W. (1980). Are Women More Responsive Than Men to the Young? A Review of Developmental and Situational Variables. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 668-695.[CrossRef
[18] Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1985). Some Components and Consequences of a Babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 312-323.[CrossRef
[19] Brosch, T., Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2007). That Baby Caught My Eye... Attention Capture by Infant Faces. Emotion, 7, 685-689.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Caballero, M. J., & Solomon, J. (1984). Effects of Model Attractiveness on Sales Response. Journal of Advertising, 13, 17-23.[CrossRef
[21] Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-Femininity: An Exception to a Famous Dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389-407.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Debevec, K., & Iyer, E. (1986). The Influence of Spokespersons in Altering a Product’s Gender Image: Implications for Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 15, 12-20.[CrossRef
[23] Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 60-71.[CrossRef
[24] Ferguson, C. A. (1964). Baby Talk in Six Languages. American Anthropologist, 66, 103-114.[CrossRef
[25] Fornäs, J. (1995). Cultural Theory and Late Modernity. Mediational Cultural Studies’ in Culture Machine.
[26] Glocker, M. L., Langleben, D. D., Ruparel, K., Loughead, J. W., Gur, R. C., & Sachser, N. (2009a). Baby Schema in Infant Faces Induces Cuteness Perception and Motivation for Caretaking in Adults. Ethology, 115, 257-263.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Bram, V. D. B. (2010). Going Green to Be Seen: Status, Reputation, and Conspicuous Conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 392-404.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Heilbrun, A. B. (1976). Measurement of Masculine and Feminine Sex Role Identities as Independent Dimensions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 183-190.[CrossRef
[29] Hinde, R. A., & Barden, L. A. (1985). The Evolution of the Teddy Bear. Animal Behaviour, 33, 1371-1373.[CrossRef
[30] Keller, K. L., Heckler, S. E., & Houston, M. J. (1998). The Effects of Brand Name Suggestiveness on Advertising Recall. Journal of Marketing, 62, 48-57.[CrossRef
[31] Klink, R. R., & Wu, L. (2014). The Role of Position, Type, and Combination of Sound Symbolism Imbeds in Brand Names. Marketing Letters, 25, 13-24.[CrossRef
[32] Lee, Y. H., & Ang, K. S. (2003). Brand Name Suggestiveness: A Chinese Language Perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20, 323-335.[CrossRef
[33] Lorenz, K. (1943). Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfa-hrung. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 5, 235-409.[CrossRef
[34] Lowrey, T. M., & Shrum, L. J. (2007). Phonetic Symbolism and Brand Name Preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 406-414.[CrossRef
[35] Madichie, N. O. (2009). Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being (8th ed.). Management Decision, 47, 845-848.[CrossRef
[36] Ogilvy, D. (2008). Confessions of an Advertising Man. 北京: 中信出版社.
[37] Shaffer, D. R., & Kipp, K. (2009). Developmental Psychology: Childhood and Adolescence. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
[38] Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of Self and Peers on Sex Role Attributes and Their Relation to Self-Esteem and Conceptions of Masculinity and Femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29-39.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Whipple, T. W., & McManamon, M. K. (2002). Implications of Using Male and Female Voices in Commercials: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Advertising, 31, 79-91.[CrossRef
[40] Wu, L., Klink, R. R., & Guo, J. S. (2013). Creating Gender Brand Personality with Brand Names: The Effects of Phonetic Symbolism. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 21, 319-330.[CrossRef
[41] Zebrowitz, L. A. (1997). Reading Faces: Window to the Soul? Personality & Individual Differences, 26, 194-195.[CrossRef