组织中员工多重认同建构过程研究述评
A Review of the Research on the Construction Process of Employees’ Multiple Identifications in Organization
DOI: 10.12677/MM.2019.95077, PDF,    国家科技经费支持
作者: 苏云霞*:上海出版传媒研究院,上海;上海出版印刷高等专科学校,上海;孙明贵:东华大学,上海
关键词: 多重认同认同建构过程模型身份冲突认同趋同Multiple Identifications Identification Construction Process Model Identity Conflict Identification Convergence
摘要: 组织中存在个体能够认同的大量群体,从职业到关系到工作群体以及组织。现有关注认同过程的研究相对缺乏,本文对相关文献进行综述后发现,组织中员工多重认同建构过程研究的理论视角主要有符号互动理论、认同需要理论、社会交换理论和身份叙事理论,组织中员工多重认同建构过程研究表明,个体利用感觉突破和/或感觉给予、叙事身份和身份扮演所提供的原始材料,通过感觉制定而产生目标认同的各种相应形式。组织中多重认同随时间流逝而发展或变化,组织中员工多重认同在建构过程中可能呈现冲突状态,也可能会发生趋同。在系统梳理现有文献后,对该领域研究的未来趋势进行了展望。
Abstract: There are a large number of groups that individuals can identify with, ranging from profession to relation to work group and organization. Current research on identity process is relatively scarce. After reviewing the relevant literature, this paper finds that the theoretical perspectives of em-ployees’ multi-identification construction process in organizations are mainly symbolic interaction theory, identification need theory, social exchange theory and identity narrative theory. Research on the construction process of employee’s multiple identificaiton in an organization shows that individuals use the raw materials provided by sensebreaking and/or sensegiving, narrative identity and identity enacting to produce various forms of goal identification through sensemaking. Employees’ multi-identification in an organization develops or changes over time. Employees’ multi-identification in an organization may present conflict or convergence in the process of con-struction. After systematically reviewing the existing literature, the future trend of the research in this field is prospected.
文章引用:苏云霞, 孙明贵. 组织中员工多重认同建构过程研究述评[J]. 现代管理, 2019, 9(5): 623-633. https://doi.org/10.12677/MM.2019.95077

参考文献

[1] Ashforth, B.E., Harrison, S.H. and Corley, K.G. (2008) Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions. Journal of Management, 34, 325-374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. (1989) Social Identity Theory and the Organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Scott, C.R., Corman, S.R. and Cheney, G. (1998) Development of a Structurational Model of Identification in the Organization. Communication Theory, 8, 298-336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 朱瑜, 童静, 黄丽君. 领导关系认同建构研究述评[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2013, 35(9): 25-34.
[5] Kreiner, G.E. and Ashforth, B.E. (2004) Evidence toward an Expanded Model of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Ashforth, B.E., Joshi, M., Anand, V. and O’Leary-Kelly, A.M. (2013) Extending the Expanded Model of Organizational Identification to Occupations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2426-2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Pratt, M.G. (2000) The Good, the Bad, and the Ambivalent: Managing Identi-fication among Amway Distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 456-493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Kärreman, D. and Alvesson, M. (2004) Cages in Tandem: Management Control, Social Identity, and Identification in a Knowledge-Intensive Firm. Organization, 11, 149-175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Josephs, I.E. and Valsiner, J. (1998) How Does Autodialogue Work? Mir-acles of Meaning Maintenance and Circumvention Strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 68-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Bourassa, L. and Ashforth, B.E. (1998) You Are about to Party Defiant Style: Social-ization and Identity Onboard an Alaskan Fishing Boat. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 27, 171-196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Eby, L.T. and McManus, S.E. (2004) The Protege’s Role in Nega-tive Mentoring Experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 255-275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Gioia, D.A. and Chittipeddi, K. (1991) Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change Initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 433-448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] DiSanza, J.R. and Bullis, C. (1999) Everybody Identifies with Smokey the Bear: Employee Responses to Newsletter Identification Inducements at the U.S. Forest Service. Management Communication Quarterly, 12, 347-399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Humberd, B.K. and Rouse, E.D. (2016) Seeing You in Me and Me in You: Personal Identification in the Phases of Mentoring Relationships. Academy of Management Review, 41, 435-455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Kristof, A.L. (1996) Person-Organization Fit: An Integrative Review of Its Conceptualizations, Measurement, and Implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Ashforth, B.E. (2001) Role Transitions in Organizational Life: An Identity-Based Perspective. Erlbaum, Mahwah. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Vough, H. (2012) Not All Identifications Are Created Equal: Exploring Employee Accounts for Workgroup, Organizational, and Professional Identifi-cation. Organization Science, 23, 778-800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Bruner, J. (1991) The Narrative Construction of Reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Pratt, M.G. (1998) To Be or Not to Be? Central Questions in Organizational Identification. In: Whetten, D.A. and Godfrey, P.C., Eds., Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 171-207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Sluss, D.M. and Ashforth, B.E. (2008) How Relational and Organiza-tional Identification Converge: Processes and Conditions. Organization Science, 19, 807-823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef