二十一世纪人格研究新进展
Personality Research Progress in the 21st Century
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2019.911224, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 高 超：江汉大学教育学院，湖北 武汉；辽宁师范大学心理学院，辽宁 大连；陈丹文, 魏 强, 郑敏晓：江汉大学教育学院，湖北 武汉
关键词: 人格研究；认知神经科学；基因技术；人格培养；Personality Research； Cognitive Neuroscience； Gene Technology； Personality Cultivation
摘要: 在心理学发展的历史进程中，人格研究一直是一个重要且独特的领域，人格作为其他心理现象与行为研究的重要基础，应该得到所有心理学研究者的关注。随着人格研究的不断发展，人格心理学也变得越来越纷繁复杂和博大精深，一方面随着脑科学技术、生物基因技术等的发展，人格的基础研究变得越来越深入；另一方面随着社会的不断进步，人格的应用研究也变得越来越全面。我们收集整理了近十多年人格研究的相关文献，试图对新世纪的人格研究进行初步的思考和探讨。
Abstract: In the history of psychology development, the personality research has been an important and special domain. As the important foundation of other psychological phenomena and behavior re-search, personality should get all psychologists’ attention. With the continuous development of personality study, personality psychology has become more and more complicated and profound. On the one hand, with the development of brain science, biological gene technology, basic research of personality is becoming more and more deeply; on the other hand, with the progress of society, the personality of applied research has become more and more comprehensive. We collected personality researches literature of the nearly 15 years, attempt to take some thinking and discussion of the personality research in the new century.
文章引用：高超, 陈丹文, 魏强, 郑敏晓 (2019). 二十一世纪人格研究新进展. 心理学进展, 9(11), 1859-1866. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2019.911224

参考文献

[1] 顾雪英, 胡湜(2012). MBTI人格类型量表: 新近发展及应用. 心理科学进展, 20(10), 1700-1708.
[2] 时勘, 王继承, 李超平(2002). 企业高层管理者胜任特征模型评价的研究. 心理学报, 34(3), 306-311.
[3] 王登峰, 崔红(2003). 中国人人格量表(QZPS)的编制过程与初步结果. 心理学报, 35(1), 127-136.
[4] 徐建平, 陈基越, 张伟, 李文雅, 盛毓(2015). 应聘者在人格测验中作假的反应过程: 基于工作赞许性的眼动证据. 心理学报, 47(11), 1395-1404.
[5] 张瑞平, 李庆安(2017). 大学生人格特质与主观幸福感的关系: 儒家心理资产的中介作用. 心理科学, 40(3), 657-663.
[6] DeYoung, C. G., Hirsh, J. B., Shane, M. S., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N., & Gray, J. R. (2010). Testing Predictions from Personality Neuroscience: Brain Structure and the Big Five. Psychological Science, 21, 820-828.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Dunkel, C. S., De Baca, T. C., Woodley, M. A., & Fernandes, H. B. (2014). The General Factor of Personality and General Intelligence: Testing Hypotheses from Differential-K, Life History Theory, and Strategic Differentiation—Integration Effort. Personality and Individual Differences, 61, 13-17.[CrossRef] 
[8] Feist, G. J. (1998). A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290-309.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Hampson, S. E. (2012). Personality Processes: Mechanisms by Which Personality Traits “Get outside the Skin”. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315-339.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Musek, J. (2007). A General Factor of Personality: Evidence for the Big One in the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213-1233.[CrossRef] 
[11] Oh, I. S., Wang, G., & Mount, M. K. (2011). Validity of Observer Ratings of the Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 762.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the Relationship between Personality and Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Vukasović, T., & Bratko, D. (2015). Heritability of Personality: A Meta-Analysis of Behavior Genetic Studies. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 769.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Yang, K. S., & Bond, M. H. (1990). Exploring Implicit Personality Theories with Indigenous or Imported Constructs: The Chinese Case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1087.[CrossRef]