基于FR和WOE评价模型的西南某管道敷设沿线地质灾害危险性分区研究
Research on the Susceptibility and Risk Zoning of Geological Disasters along the Southwest China Gas Pipeline Based on FR and WOE Evaluation Models
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2019.911125, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 张 博, 石晓栊:中石化川气东送天然气管道有限公司,湖北 武汉;高姣姣, 宗乐斌:北京中地华安地质勘查有限公司,北京
关键词: 易发性与危险性频率比模型证据权模型Susceptibility and Risk FR WOE
摘要: 西南某管道工程贯穿我国东西部地区,沿途环境多样,地质灾害频发。因此,开展管道沿线的地质灾害易发性与危险性研究对于提高管道的安全运营程度具有重要的指导作用。本研究基于频率比模型和证据权模型的定量计算方法,在掌握管道敷设沿线地质灾害特征与分布规律基础上,对研究区地质灾害影响因子划分并叠加管道敷设因子后,进行研究区地质灾害易发性和危险性评价。评价结果表明,管道敷设沿线可分为地质灾害高易发区、中易发区、及低易发区,其面积分别占总面积的30.38%、49.02%、20.6%,在易发性分区基础上,叠加管道敷设方式后,将管道敷设区域分为地质灾害高危险区、中危险区、低危险区,经统计分析,各危险区的面积分别占总面积的18.2%、44.13%、37.67%。
Abstract: The Southwest China Gas Pipeline Project runs through the eastern and western regions of China, with diverse environments along the way and frequent geological disasters. Therefore, the research on the susceptibility and risk of geological disasters along the pipeline has an important guiding role in improving the safe operation of the Southwest China Gas Pipeline. Based on the Frequency Ratio (FR) and weight of evidence model (WOE), after grasping the geological hazard characteristics and distribution rules along the pipeline laying, this paper divides the geological disaster index factors in the study area and superimposes the pipeline laying factor, and then evaluates the susceptibility and risk of geological disasters in the study area. The evaluation results show that the pipeline laying can be divided into geological disaster high-prone area, medium-prone area, and low-prone area, with the area accounting for 30.38%, 49.02%, and 20.6% of the total area, respectively. After the superimposed pipeline laying method, the pipeline laying area is divided into high-risk area, medium-risk area and low-risk area of geological disasters. According to statistical analysis, the area of each dangerous area accounts for 18.2%, 44.13% and 37.67% of the total area respectively.
文章引用:张博, 石晓栊, 高姣姣, 宗乐斌. 基于FR和WOE评价模型的西南某管道敷设沿线地质灾害危险性分区研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2019, 9(11): 1192-1204. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2019.911125

参考文献

[1] 李永红, 向茂西, 贺卫中, 等. 陕西汉中汉台区地质灾害易发性和危险性分区评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2014, 25(3): 108-112.
[2] Choi, J., Oh, H.J., Lee, H.J., et al. (2012) Combining Landslide Susceptibility Maps Obtained from Frequency Ratio, Logistic Regression, and Artificial Neural Network Models Using ASTER Images and GIS. Engi-neering Geology, 124, 12-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Guo, C.B., Montgomery, D.R. and Zhang, Y.S. (2015) Quantitative Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility along the Xianshuihe Fault Zone, Tibetan Plateau, China. Geomorphology, 248, 93-110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 杜军, 杨清华, 严嘉, 等. 基于GIS与信息量模型的汶川次生地质灾害危险性评价[J]. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 2010, 35(2): 325-330.
[5] 范强, 巨能攀, 向喜琼, 等. 证据权法在区域滑坡危险性评价中的应用——以贵州省为例[J]. 工程地质学报, 2014, 22(3): 474-481.
[6] 郭子正, 殷坤龙, 付圣, 等. GIS与WOE-BP模型的滑坡易发性评价[J/OL]. 地球科学: 1-24, http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1874.P.20180313.1752.016.html, 2019-11-26.
[7] 李郎平, 兰恒星, 郭长宝, 等. 基于改进频率比法的川藏铁路沿线及邻区地质灾害易发性分区评价[J]. 现代地质, 2017, 31(5): 911-929.
[8] 王志旺, 李瑞有, 王湘桂. 证据权法在滑坡危险度区划研究中的应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007, 29(8): 1268-1273.
[9] 孙佳伟, 刘海南, 傅少君. 彬县水利建设的地质灾害易发性与危险性分区评价[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2018(11): 103-107.
[10] McNelis, P.D. (2005) Neural Networks in Finance: What Are Neural Networks? Academic Press, Cambridge, 13-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Agterberg, F.P. (1992) Combining Indicator Patterns in Weights of Evidence Modeling for Resource Evaluation. Nonrenewable Resources, 1, 39-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 殷坤龙. 滑坡灾害风险分析[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
[13] 张春山, 张业成, 马寅生, 等. 区域地质灾害风险评价要素权值计算方法及应用[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2006, 33(6): 84-88.
[14] 张英. 基于ArcGIS的旬阳县地质灾害易发性分区评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 长安大学, 2014: 39-64.
[15] 阮沈勇, 黄润秋. 基于GIS的信息量法模型在地质灾害危险性区划中的应用[J]. 成都理工学院学报, 2001, 28(1): 89-92.