储能柜冲击试验仿真和随机振动疲劳寿命研究
Research on Impact Test Simulation and Random Vibration Fatigue Life of Energy Storage Cabinet
摘要: 超级电容的优良性能使其在轨道交通车辆的装车占比越来越大,为适应超级电容储能柜结构紧凑和较高的轻量化要求,对柜体结构进行强度仿真和疲劳寿命预估就变得越发复杂和重要。针对某列车储能柜,根据标准IEC 61373-2010,采用有限元分析软件,应用模态叠加法模拟了冲击试验过程中的受力情况,计算了随机振动环境下的响应,得到了结构的1σ、2σ、3σ Von Mises最大应力。利用材料的S/N曲线,并基于高斯分布和Miner提出的线性疲劳累计损伤理论,对结构在给定随机振动环境下的疲劳寿命进行了预估。结果验证了仿真方法的可行性,为产品的安全和可靠性设计提供依据。
Abstract: The excellent performance of super capacitor makes it more and more important to load in rail transit vehicles. In order to adapt to the compact and high lightweight requirements of super ca-pacitor energy storage cabinet, the strength simulation and fatigue life prediction of the cabinet structure become more and more complex and significant. For a train energy storage cabinet, ac-cording to the Standard IEC 61373-2010, the finite element analysis software is used to simulate the stress in the process of impact test by mode superposition method. The response under random vibration environment is calculated, and the maximum Von Mises stress of 1σ, 2σ, 3σ is obtained. Based on the S/N curve of the material, the fatigue life of the structure under the given random vibration environment is estimated based on the Gauss distribution and linear fatigue cumulative damage theory proposed by Miner. The results verify the feasibility of the simulation method and provide the basis for the safety and reliability design of products.
文章引用:李向东, 傅冠生, 邓谊柏, 赵如如. 储能柜冲击试验仿真和随机振动疲劳寿命研究[J]. 机械工程与技术, 2019, 8(6): 491-499. https://doi.org/10.12677/MET.2019.86057

参考文献

[1] 黄庆福. 基于Hypermesh和ANSYS的超级电容充电柜体的强度分析[J]. 中国设备工程, 2017(6): 73-76.
[2] 米承继, 谷正气, 伍文广, 陶坚, 梁小波, 彭国谱. 随机载荷下矿用自卸车后桥壳疲劳寿命分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2012, 48(12): 103-109.
[3] 方吉, 兆文忠, 朴明伟. 基于模态叠加法的焊接结构疲劳寿命预测方法研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(5): 186-192.
[4] ICE 61373-2010 (2010) Railway Applications-Rolling Stock Equipment-Shock and Vibration Test. Commission Electra-Technique International, Geneva.
[5] 刘延柱, 陈文良, 陈立群. 振动力学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1998.
[6] 沙云东, 郭小鹏, 张军. 基于应力概率密度和功率谱密度法的随机声疲劳寿命预估方法研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2010, 29(1): 162-165+244.
[7] 张昱, 朱彤, 周晶. 对功率谱密度传递率作用原理的探究[J]. 振动工程学报, 2016, 29(6): 992-1002.
[8] Liberatore, S. and Carman, G. (2004) Power Spectral Density Analysis for Damage Identification and Location. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 274, 761-776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 孙伟. 结构振动疲劳寿命估算方法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2005.
[10] 王文涛, 上官文斌, 段小成, 姚斌辉. 基于线性疲劳累计损伤橡胶悬置疲劳寿命预测研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2012, 48(10): 56-65.
[11] Hashin, Z. and Rotem, A.A. (1978) Cumulative Damage Theory of Fatigue Failure. Materials Science and Engineering, 34, 147-160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 刚宪约, 李丽君, 柴山, 李双. 求解运动激励结构动态响应的固定边界-模态叠加法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(13): 87-93.
[13] 郑荣慧, 陈怀海, 贺旭东, 王亮. 一种多输入多输出非高斯随机振动试验方法[J]. 振动工程学报, 2017, 30(5): 697-702.
[14] 贺光宗, 陈怀海, 贺旭东, 田俊丰. 多轴向与单轴向随机振动疲劳试验对比研究[J]. 振动工程学报, 2015, 28(5): 754-761.
[15] 孙凌玉, 吕振华. 利用计算机仿真技术预测车身零件疲劳寿命[J]. 汽车工程, 2001(6): 389-391+410.
[16] 周迅, 俞小莉, 李迎. 稳态疲劳载荷下曲轴剩余强度模型的试验研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2006(4): 213-217.
[17] Mohanty, P. and Rixen, D.J. (2004) Operational Modal Analysis in the Presence of Harmonic Excitation. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 270, 93-109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef