衡量国家规模:纯粹的领土问题
Measuring the Size of a Country: A Purely Territorial Issue
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2019.812284, PDF,   
作者: 田大卫:约翰•霍普金斯大学,马里兰州 巴尔的摩;王 红:汕头大学,广东 汕头;田 广:怀化学院,湖南 怀化
关键词: 国家规模国家领土国家自治国家人口国家能力Country Scale National Territory National Autonomy National Population National Capacity
摘要: 在政治科学领域,国家的概念至为重要。然而,尽管其在政治科学领域中占据核心,且无处不在,学术界对于国家的构成主体仍然缺乏明确的共识。政治学学者对国家的认识存在很大分歧,而对如何衡量国家规模的共识更少。曾有学者建议,用人口数量、经济指标、军事能量等变量来衡量国家规模,但并未达成共识。本文论证了统一国家规模的定义的必要性,并指出衡量一个国家规模唯一有效且合理的路径,就是衡量国家控制下的领土面积,除此之外用其他任何变量来测定国家规模的做法都欠妥当。
Abstract: In the field of political science, the concept of state is very important. However, although it occu-pies the core in the field of political science and is ubiquitous, the academic community still lacks a clear consensus on the main measures of a country. Scholars in the field of political science have great differences on the understanding of the country; they have limited consensuses on how to measure the size of a country. Some scholars have suggested that the population, economic indicators, military forces and other variables should be used to measure the size of a country, but there is no consensus. This paper demonstrates the necessity of unifying the definition of the scale of a country, and points out that the most effective and reasonable way to measure the scale of a country is to measure the territorial area under the control by the country. It is not appropriate to use any other variables to measure the scale of a country.
文章引用:田大卫, 王红, 田广. 衡量国家规模:纯粹的领土问题[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2019, 8(12): 2072-2081. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2019.812284

参考文献

[1] Hobbes, T. (1651) Leviathan. Part One Chapter Thirteen, Oxford University Press, London, UK.
[2] Tilly, C. (1975) Reflections on the History of European State-Making. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Studies in Political Development. Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ.
[3] [丹麦]考斯塔∙艾斯平-安德森. 福利资本主义的三个世界[M]. 郑秉文, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003.
[4] Johnson, C. (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.
[5] Cudworth, E., et al. (2007) The Modern State: Theories and Ideologies. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.
[6] Veenendaal, W.P. and Corbett, J. (2015) Why Small States Offer Important Answers to Large Questions. Comparative Political Studies, 48, 527-549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Huntington, S.P. (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
[8] Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
[9] Scully, G.W. (1989) The Size of the State, Economic Growth and the Efficient Utilization of National Resources. Public Choice, 63, 149-164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Vandenbosch, A. (1964) The Small States in International Politics and Organization. The Journal of Politics, 26, 293-312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Wang, T. (2014) Small State, Big Influence: China’s North Korea Policy Dilemma. The Georgetown Journal of Asian Affairs, 1, 5-24.
[12] Lake, D.A. and O’Mahony, A. (2004) The Incredible Shrinking State. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48, 699-722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Collier, D. and Levitsky, S. (1997) Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. World Politics, 49, 430-451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Donovan, J.C., Morgan, R.E., Potholm, C.P. and Weigle, M. (1993) People, Power and Politics: An Introduction to Political Science. 3rd Edition, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD.
[15] Weber, M. (1968) Political Community. In: Roth, G. and Wittich, C., Eds., Economy and Society, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1-4.
[16] Bourdieu, P. (1994) Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field. Sociological Theory, 12, 1-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Poggi, G. (1990) The State: Its Nature, Development, and Prospects. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.
[18] Mann, M. (1984) The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms, and Results. European Journal of Sociology, 25, 185-213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Jones, M. (2016) Polymorphic Political Geographies. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4, 1-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Morgan, D. (2007) The Mongols. 2nd Edition, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ.
[21] Anckar, D. (2010) Small Is Democratic, But Who Is Small? Arts and Social Sciences Journal, 2, 1-10.
[22] Crowards, T. (2002) Defining the Category of “Small” States. Journal of International Development, 14, 143-179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Davidheiser, E.B. (1992) Strong States, Weak States: The Role of the State in Revolution. Comparative Politics, 24, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Pardo, R.P. and Reeves, J. (2014) Weak Power Bargaining with China: Mongolia and North Korea in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Contemporary China, 23, 1152-1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Barston, R.P. (1973) The Other Powers: Studies in the Foreign Policies of Small States. Allen & Unwin, Crow’s Nest, 15-16.
[26] Jennings, R. (2017) China’s Three Worst Border Disputes—And Its Best Border Buddy. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2017/07/27/chinas-3-worst-border-disputes-and-its-best-border-buddy/#2f90ac524f36
[27] Tian, D.K. (2019) Measuring State Size: Purely a Matter of Territory. Towson University Journal of International Affairs, 52, 27-43.