输电线路污闪前的大气环流特征分析
Characteristic Analysis of Atmospheric Circulation before Pollution Flashover on Power Transmission Lines
DOI: 10.12677/CCRL.2020.91003, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 张翠华*, 阎 访:河北省石家庄市气象局,河北 石家庄;郭立平:河北省廊坊市气象局,河北 廊坊
关键词: 输电线路污闪大气环流特征分析Lightning Strike Pollution Flashover Atmospheric Circulation Characteristic Analysis
摘要: 利用石家庄地区1999~2018年电力污闪事故发生的详细资料,运用天气学原理和统计分析方法对43次发生个例最近一个时次天气形势和大气层结做细致分析。结果表明:发生电力污闪时大气环流形势场主要有四种配置类型,其中,第1类发生电力污闪的概率最高,其次是第2类与第3类,这两种发生电力污闪的概率相同,第4类发生电力污闪的概率最低;第1类当石家庄上空为高空槽控制,地面为地面倒槽、地面高压前部或地面鞍型场时;第2类当高空850 hPa至500 hPa为高压脊前(冷涡后偏北气流),地面为地面高压底前部或地面倒槽时;第3类当高空700h Pa至500 hPa为高压脊(西北气流控制),850 hPa存在切变线或槽线,地面为地面高压底前部,低压或均压场时;第4类当高空为偏西环流控制,地面为地面倒槽,地面高压底前部或高压后部时;近地层湿或存在逆温是电力污闪发生不可忽视的因素。
Abstract: Based on the detailed information on electric power pollution flashover from 1999 to 2018 in Shijiazhuang, weather situation and atmospheric stratification at latest time of 43 times occurrence case were analyzed by use of weather science and analysis method. The results showed that, atmospheric circulation situation had mainly four kinds of configuration types as electric power pollution flashover was occurring, the first kind of occurring electric power pollution flashover had the highest probability; the second kind and third kind had the same probability; and the fourth kind had the lowest probability. The first kind was high altitude being in high-level trough with lower altitude being in surface trough, the front of ground high pressure or ground saddle field. The second kind was 850 hPa to 500 hPa of high altitude being in the front of ridge of pressure with lower altitude being in the front of ground high pressure bottom or surface trough. The third kind was 700 hPa to 500hPa of high altitude being in ridge of pressure and 850hPa of high altitude being shear line or trough line with lower altitude being in the front of ground high pressure bottom, low pressure or uniform pressure field. The fourth kind was high altitude being in westerly flow with lower altitude being in surface trough, the front of ground high pressure bottom or high pressure rear. Surface layer that was wet and in which there was temperature inversion played an unneglectable role in leading to electric power pollution flashover occurring.
文章引用:张翠华, 郭立平, 阎访. 输电线路污闪前的大气环流特征分析[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2020, 9(1): 18-25. https://doi.org/10.12677/CCRL.2020.91003

参考文献

[1] 甘璐, 叶宽, 张德山, 丁谊. 北京市电网灾害的时空分布特征及与气象因素的关系[J]. 气象, 2012, 38(3): 349-352.
[2] 路永玲, 陶风波, 周志成, 刘洋. 气象灾害对江苏电网设备的影响及防御分析[J]. 南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 7(5):469-474.
[3] 王兴发, 曹怀予, 肖军诗, 张强, 陆愈实. 我国电网自然灾害预警系统研究[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2012, 19(6): 38-44.
[4] 张永欣, 李广霞, 于秀捷. 沈阳一次“雾闪”气象条件分析[J]. 辽宁气象, 2004(3): 43-44.
[5] 宋明月, 刘光远, 王建成, 赵杰, 苏盛. 气温变化对石家庄市供暖式雾霾的影响及防污闪潜力分析[J]. 电力建设, 2015, 36(6): 119-123.
[6] 顾节经, 顾岩. 雾闪停电灾害的成因分析[J]. 山东气象, 2001(3): 53-54.
[7] 刁平, 孙新莲, 杨秀兰. 乌鲁木齐市电业污闪的气象因素分析[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2002, 25(5): 26-29.
[8] 张夏琨, 王春玲, 王宝鉴. 气象条件对石家庄市空气质量的影响[J]. 干旱气象, 2011, 29(1): 42-47.
[9] 毛冬艳, 杨贵名. 华北平原雾发生的气象条件[J]. 气象, 2006, 32(1): 78-83.
[10] 陈瑞敏, 吴雁, 刘晓峰, 徐建芬. 2007年1月初河北省连续大雾的成因分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2008, 26(2): 63-66.
[11] 侯瑞钦, 李江波, 赵玉广. 河北平原一次持续大雾天气分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2009(3): 69-76.
[12] 阎访, 陈静, 车少静. 石家庄夏季用电量对天气的响应及其预测模型[J]. 干旱气象, 2009(3): 88-93.