证据属性司法实践存在的问题及其应对
Problems in Judicial Practice of Evidence Attribute and Their Solutions
DOI: 10.12677/DS.2020.61002, PDF,   
作者: 姜远志*:沈阳师范大学法学院,辽宁 沈阳
关键词: 证据属性相互印证证据取舍 Evidence Attribute Mutual Confirmation Evidence Choice
摘要: 证据属性,具有明确的内涵和详细的判断标准。然而,证据属性的实践,却混淆了其和其他既定概念的区别,并对其判断规则进行了全新的阐释。这一方面是出于法律人的知识局限,另一方面,则是基于某些制度性的利益考量之下的理性选择。证据属性含义的误用,导致了理论和秩序的混乱,应当予以纠正;而对于证据属性的判断规则的重新诠释,则应予以肯定。
Abstract: The attribute of evidence has clear connotation and detailed judgment standard. However, the practice of evidence attribute confuses the difference between it and other established concepts, and gives a new interpretation of its judgment rules. On the one hand, it is due to the limited knowledge of the legal person, on the other hand, it is a rational choice based on the consideration of some institutional interests. The misuse of the meaning of evidence attribute leads to the confusion of theory and order, which should be corrected, while the reinterpretation of the judgment rules of evidence attribute should be affirmed.
文章引用:姜远志. 证据属性司法实践存在的问题及其应对[J]. 争议解决, 2020, 6(1): 9-14. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2020.61002

参考文献

[1] 汤维建. 关于证据属性的若干思考和讨论——以证据的客观性为中心[J]. 政法论坛, 2000(6): 127-139.
[2] 大连市中级人民法院. 朱煜、曲深香与董红彬、王涛等道路交通事故人身损害赔偿纠纷再审民事判决书[Z]. 大连市中级人民法院(2014)大审民再终字第42号.
[3] 上海市第二中级人民法院. 西安哲美电子信息技术有限公司与李娜不当得利纠纷二审民事判决书[Z]. 上海市第二中级人民法院(2016)沪02民终8270号.
[4] 肖建华. 证据属性之判断——比较法与法学方法论的启示[J]. 甘肃政法学院学报, 2006(2): 27-36.
[5] 张中. 法官眼里无事实:证据裁判原则下的事实、证据与事实认定[J]. 浙江工商大学学报, 2017(5): 23-31.