粉细砂地层高承压水基坑突涌破坏受力变形特征分析
Stress and Deformation Characteristics Analysis of Surge Damage of High-Confined Water Foundation Pit in Silty Sand Stratum
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2020.91006, PDF,   
作者: 师文明, 吴 烁:中铁十四局集团大盾构工程有限公司,江苏 南京;丁春林, 任 壮:同济大学道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室,上海
关键词: 粉细砂地层高承压水基坑突涌塑性破坏Silty Sand Stratum High Confined Water Foundation Ditch Inrushing Plastic Failure
摘要: 针对无锡地铁粉细砂地层高承压水基坑,建立了基坑突涌塑性破坏的有限元计算模型,研究了基坑突涌塑性破坏受力变形特征,分析了承压水位降深和坑底土粘聚力对基坑突涌的影响。结果表明:基坑开挖导致坑底土应力场产生了重新分布,应力重分布情况在端头井中部靠近标准段附近表现尤为突出,使得靠近标准段隆起位移最大,并且坑底土较周边产生应力突增的现象。端头井在靠近标准段两侧的坑底土底部的屈服应力比最大,所以在承压含水层顶板处最先发生破坏,然后破坏范围自底向上扩展,直至基坑底部发生破坏。坑底土最大竖向位移随着承压水水位降深增加而逐渐减小,大致呈线性变化;坑底土最大应力比随着承压水水位降深增加而逐渐减小,刚开始变化幅度较大,随后趋于平缓;坑底土最大竖向位移和坑底土最大应力比随着坑底土粘聚力增加而逐渐减小,粘聚力的增加对于基坑突涌稳定性的影响十分显著。
Abstract: Aiming at the foundation pit with high confined water in silty sand stratum, based on the plastic deformation and failure characteristics of inrush, the finite element model of inrush seepage failure of foundation pit is established, and the influence of the depth of confined water level and the cohesion of soil at the bottom of the pit on the inrush of foundation pit is studied. The results show that the stress field of the pit bottom soil is redistributed due to the excavation of the foundation pit, which is especially prominent near the standard section in the middle of the end well, and makes the stress of the pit bottom soil increase sharply compared with the surrounding soil. The yield stress ratio of the end well is the largest at the bottom of the pit soil near the standard section, so the failure occurs first at the top of the confined aquifer, and then the failure range expands from bottom to top until the bottom of the pit is damaged. The maximum vertical displacement of pit bottom soil decreases gradually with the increase of confined water level, which shows a linear change. The maximum stress ratio of pit bottom soil decreases gradually with the increase of confined water level, and changes greatly at first, then tends to be flat. The maximum vertical displacement of pit bottom soil and the maximum stress ratio of pit bottom soil decrease gradually with the increase of cohesion of pit bottom soil, and the cohesion increases. It has an obvious effect on the stability of the foundation pit gushing.
文章引用:师文明, 丁春林, 吴烁, 任壮. 粉细砂地层高承压水基坑突涌破坏受力变形特征分析[J]. 土木工程, 2020, 9(1): 43-52. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2020.91006

参考文献

[1] 丁春林. 软土地区弱透水层承压水基坑突涌计算模型研究[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(10): 194-199.
[2] 徐长节, 徐礼阁, 孙凤明, 於锦, 杨迪. 深基坑承压水的风险控制及处理实例[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(S1): 353-358.
[3] 胡云华. 临江高承压水超深基坑开挖抗突涌分析与对策——以南京纬三路长江隧道梅子洲风井基坑为例[J]. 隧道建设, 2015, 35(11): 1194-1201.
[4] 李军, 李亮亮. 承压水地层基坑坑底压拉突涌评价与物理试验[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(3): 670-674+679.
[5] 张飞, 李镜培, 孙长安. 内撑式深基坑承压水抗突涌稳定数值模拟技术[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2017, 13(4): 1098-1105.
[6] 崔永高. 悬挂式帷幕基坑底侧突涌的坑内水头抬升研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2017, 25(3): 699-705.
[7] 李瑛, 胡德军, 叶向前, 胡琦, 刘兴旺. 基于事故分析的深基坑承压水突涌机理研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(3): 943-948.
[8] 姜徐彬, 王立忠, 洪义. 基于扩展有限元方法的基坑突涌研究[J]. 低温建筑技术, 2019, 41(4): 88-92+119.
[9] 夏春亮, 谢伟东, 吴建. 承压水富水砂层深基坑的坑底抗突涌加固措施研究[J]. 市政技术, 2019, 37(1): 201-205+208.
[10] 刘胜利, 蒋盛钢, 曹成勇. 强透水砂卵地层深基坑地下水控制方案比选与优化设计[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2018, 15(12): 3189-3197.
[11] 程泽海, 于振帅, 金炜枫, 宋泽源. 考虑桩基影响的基坑突涌模型试验研究[J]. 科技通报, 2018, 34(8): 206-210.
[12] 曾晋, 陈波. 基于FLAC-(3D)的深基坑突涌事故数值分析及处置措施[J]. 工程勘察, 2018, 46(7): 11-15.
[13] 高广运, 周奎, 姚哨峰. 承压水作用下基坑三维有限差分模型分析[J]. 结构工程师, 2017, 33(6): 146-154.
[14] 郭晓强. 复杂地质条件下深大基坑降水技术[J]. 山西建筑, 2017, 43(32): 57-58.
[15] 张飞, 李镜培, 沈广军. 承压水作用下深基坑突涌稳定性及其参数影响分析[J]. 结构工程师, 2015, 31(6): 129-136.