人情压力和惩罚代价对第三方惩罚的影响——社会距离的调节效应
The Effect of Human Relationship Pressure and Punishment Cost on Third-Party Punishment: The Moderating Effect of Social Distance
摘要: 使用第三方惩罚范式通过控制惩罚者和接受者的社会距离探究惩罚价格、人情压力对第三方惩罚的影响以及社会距离在其中的调节作用。结果发现:惩罚代价和人情压力对第三方惩罚产生显著影响。社会距离为普通朋友时,人情压力对第三方惩罚产生的影响最大;并且随着惩罚代价的上升,除普通朋友水平,陌生人、好朋友和父母水平下人情压力的影响均增大。研究表明人情压力和惩罚代价均会影响人们的惩罚行为,但只有在付出代价较低时人们才会维持与普通朋友的人情关系。
Abstract: The purpose of this research is to use third-party punishment game to explore the effect of human relationship pressure and punishment cost on third-party punishment and analyze the moderating effect of the social distance in that effect by controlling the social distance between the third-party punisher and the recipient. In study 2, the results show that the main effect of human relationship pressure and social distance is both significant. With the social distance getting closer, the punishment becomes heavier. Under high level human relationship pressure, third-party pu-nishment is significantly heavier than that under low level. The partial effect size of human rela-tionship stress is the greatest when social distance is ordinary friends’ level. In study 2, the results show that the main effect of human relationship pressure, social distance and punishment cost is both significant. The interaction of the three variables is significant. Simple effect analysis shows that when social distance is at the level of strangers, good friends and parents, the role of human relationship pressure increases with the rise of punishment cost. But when social distance is or-dinary friends, the role of human pressure decreases rapidly with the increase of punishment cost. These results suggest that the third party will not unrestrictedly sacrifice its own interests to maintain human relationship with ordinary friends.
文章引用:师恭敬 (2020). 人情压力和惩罚代价对第三方惩罚的影响——社会距离的调节效应. 心理学进展, 10(2), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.102018

参考文献

[1] 陈世平, 薄欣(2016). 公平与惩罚价格对第三方惩罚需求的影响. 心理与行为研究, 14(3), 372-376.
[2] 陈思静, 何铨, 马剑虹(2015). 第三方惩罚对合作行为的影响: 基于社会规范激活的解释. 心理学报, 47(3), 389-405.
[3] 范良聪, 刘璐, 梁捷(2013). 第三方的惩罚需求: 一个实验研究. 经济研究, (5), 98-111.
[4] 冯秋迪, 许燕, 隆逸芝, 张旻昱(2015). 人情愧疚感如何“心理绑架”公平的分配行为. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 51(4), 423-428.
[5] 梁燕玲(2013). 社会距离对利他惩罚影响的实验研究. 博士论文. 重庆: 西南大学.
[6] 汪崇金, 史丹(2016). 利他惩罚威胁足以维系社会合作吗——一项公共品实验研究. 财贸经济, 37(3), 45-59.
[7] 徐杰, 孙向超, 董悦, 汪祚军, 李伟强, 袁博(2017). 人情与公正的抉择: 社会距离对第三方干预的影响. 心理科学, 40(5), 1175-1181.
[8] 岳玉洁(2015). 特质移情和同情情绪对大学生网络利他行为的影响. 硕士论文. 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[9] 翟学伟(2004). 人情、面子与权力的再生产——情理社会中的社会交换方式. 社会学研究, (5), 48-57.
[10] 翟学伟(2009). 是“关系”, 还是社会资本. 社会, 29(1), 109-121.
[11] 周怀峰, 谢长虎(2015). 强互惠、非强互惠第三方惩罚与群体合作秩序. 中国行政管理, 359(5), 97-103.
[12] Au, A. K. M., & Wong, D. S. N. (2000). The Impact of Guanxi on the Ethical Deci-sion-Making Process of Auditors: An Exploratory Study on Chinese CPAS in Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 87-93.[CrossRef
[13] Barclay, P. (2006). Reputational Benefits for Altruistic Punishment. Evolution & Human Behavior, 27, 325-344.[CrossRef
[14] Bechler, C. (2013). Choices in Two-Person Interactions: The Effect of Amount and Social Distance on Offers in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games. Undergraduate Honors Thesis, St. Louis, MI: Washington University.
[15] Bendor, J., & Swistak, P. (2001). The Evolution of Norms. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1493-1545.[CrossRef
[16] Bernhard, H., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2006). Parochial Altruism in Humans. Nature, 442, 912-915.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). The Evolution of Altruistic Punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 3531-3535.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Camila, C., Ludovico, M., Felipe, F., & Boggio, P. S. (2011). Responding to Unfair Offers Made by a Friend: Neuroelectrical Activity Changes in the Anterior Medial Prefrontal Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 15569-15574.[CrossRef
[19] Cappelletti, D., Güth, W., & Ploner, M. (2011). Being of Two Minds: Ultimatum Offers under Cognitive Constraints. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 940-950.[CrossRef
[20] Fehr, E. (2004). Third-Party Punishment and Social Norms. Evolu-tion & Human Behavior, 25, 63-87.[CrossRef
[21] Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Social Norms and Human Cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 185-190.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competi-tion, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-868.[CrossRef
[23] Kurzban, R., Descioli, P., & O’Brien, E. (2007). Audience Effects on Moralistic Punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 75-84.[CrossRef
[24] Lerner, M. J. (2010). The Justice Motive in Social Beha-vior: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 1-19.[CrossRef
[25] Mulder, L. B., Dijk, V. E., Cremer, D., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2006). Undermining Trust and Cooperation: The Paradox of Sanctioning Systems in Social Dilemmas. Journal of Expe-rimental Social Psychology, 42, 147-162.[CrossRef
[26] Quervain, J. F. D., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A. et al. (2004). The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment. Science, 305, 1254-1258.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Rockenbach, B., & Fehr, E. (2003). Detrimental Effects of Sanctions on Human Altruism. Nature, 422, 137-140.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S. (2007). Neural Basis of Cultural In-fluence on Self-Representation. Neuroimage, 34, 1310-1316.[CrossRef] [PubMed]