乳腺术后急性痛与光电容积脉搏波变化的关系
The Relationship between Postoperative Acute Pain after Breast Surgery and Changes in Photoplethysmographic Waveform
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2020.103035, PDF,   
作者: 赵秀秀, 胡夏娟, 徐 磊:南京医科大学附属南京医院(南京市第一医院)麻醉科,江苏 南京
关键词: 指光电容积脉搏波全身麻醉术后疼痛镇痛药Finger Photoplethysmographic Waveform General Anesthesia Pain after Surgery Analgesic
摘要: 目的:探讨乳腺手术患者全身麻醉苏醒后急性痛与光电容积脉搏波波幅变化的关系。方法:选择全身麻醉下行乳腺手术65例,女性患者,年龄18~65岁,ASA I或II级。麻醉诱导采用静脉注射丙泊酚1.5 mg/kg、舒芬太尼0.4 ug/kg,睫毛反射消失时静脉注射顺式阿曲库铵0.2 mg/kg;麻醉维持采用全凭静脉麻醉,丙泊酚5~6 mg•kg−1•h−1、瑞芬太尼0.2~0.3 ug•kg−1•h−1。记录患者入室后5 min (T0)、苏醒后10 min (T1)、苏醒后20 min (T2)、苏醒后30 min (T3)各时间点的心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、脉搏波收缩波波幅(PPGA)和记录静态VAS评分,计算Tx与T0时间点PPGA比值定义为PPGATx/T0。根据患者T1时刻的VAS评分将患者分为轻度疼痛组(L组)和中度疼痛组(M组),若发现VAS评分 ≥ 4分则给予羟考酮0.09 mg/kg。结果:与T0时比较,T1时L组SBP、DBP、PPGA降低,VAS增加,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);M组SBP、DBP、VAS增加,PPGA降低,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);T2、T3时两组HR、SBP、DBP、PPGA降低,VAS增加,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与前一时间点比较,L组T2较T1时HR降低,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);M组T2较T1时HR、SBP、DBP、VAS降低,PPGA、PPGATx/T0增加,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);T3较T2时SBP、DBP、VAS降低,PPGA、PPGATx/T0增加,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与L组比较,M组T1时VAS评分显著增高,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);T2、T3时SBP、DBP、VAS显著降低,PPGA、PPGATx/T0显著增高,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。Pearson相关分析显示:VAS评分与HR、SBP、DBP无明显相关性,与PPGA (r = −0.437, P < 0.01)及PPGATx/T0(r = −0.948, P < 0.01)呈负相关性。结论:全身麻醉苏醒后轻中度疼痛可以引起光电容积脉搏波波幅显著降低,对VAS疼痛评分中度患者给予镇痛药缓解疼痛至VAS疼痛评分为轻度时波幅可明显增加但不超过术前水平,伴有PPGATx/T0增大且<1,PPGATx/T0改变在评估全身麻醉苏醒后急性痛方面具有参考价值。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the relationship between postoperative acute pain and photoplethysmographic waveform changes in patients undergoing breast surgery after emergence from general anesthesia. Methods: Sixty-five patients, undergoing breast surgery under general anesthesia, female patients, aged 18 - 65 years, falling to ASA physical status I or II, were included in this study. Induction of anesthesia was induced by intravenous propofol 1.5 mg/kg, sufentanil 0.4 ug/kg and cisatracurium besilate 0.2 mg/kg; total intravenous anesthesia was maintained by intravenous infusion propofol 5 - 6 mg•kg−1•h−1 and remifentanil 0.2 - 0.3 ug•kg−1•h−1. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), photoplethysmographic main wave amplitude (PPGA), static VAS score were recorded at 5 min after enter the operating room (T0), 10 min (T1), 20 min (T2), 30 min (T3) after emergence from anesthesia. The ratio of PPGA at the time point of Tx and T0 is calculated and it is defined as PPGATx/T0. The patients were divided into mild pain group (L group) and moderate pain group (M group) according to the VAS score at the time of T1. If VAS score ≥ 4, oxycodone was given at 0.09 mg/kg. Results: Compared with T0, SBP, DBP, PPGA in group L significantly decreased (P < 0.05), VAS significantly increased (P < 0.05) at T1; SBP, DBP, VAS in group M significantly increased, PPGA significantly decreased (P < 0.05) at T1; HR, SBP, DBP, PPGA in two groups significantly decreased, VAS significantly increased (P < 0.05) at T2, T3; compared with the previous time point, T2 had lower HR than T1 (P < 0.05) in group L; T2 had lower HR, SBP, DBP, and VAS than T1, and PPGA and PPGATx/T0 increased(P < 0.05) in group M. Compared with T2, SBP, DBP, VAS decreased, and PPGA, PPGATx/T0 increased at T3 (P < 0.05). Compared with the group L, the VAS score was significantly increased at T1 (P < 0.05); SBP, DBP, and VAS were significantly decreased at T2 and T3, PPGA and PPGATx/T0 were significantly increased in group M (P < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was no correlation between VAS scores and HR, SBP, and DBP, and it dislayed a significant negative relationship with PPGA (r = −0.437, P < 0.01) and PPGATx/T0 (r = −0.948, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Mild to moderate pain after emergence from general anesthesia can cause significant reduction in the photoplethysmographic main wave amplitude. When patients with moderate VAS pain scores can be given analgesics to relieve pain to the VAS pain score which is mild, the amplitude can be significantly increased but not exceed the preoperative level, and PPGATx/T0 increases but less than 1, PPGATx/T0 maybe has reference value in assessing the pain degree after general anesthesia.
文章引用:赵秀秀, 胡夏娟, 徐磊. 乳腺术后急性痛与光电容积脉搏波变化的关系[J]. 临床医学进展, 2020, 10(3): 215-221. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2020.103035

参考文献

[1] Jarrell, J., Robert, M., Giamberardino, M.A., et al. (2018) Pain, Psychosocial Tests, Pain Sensitization and Laparoscopic Pelvic Surgery. Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 18, 49-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Pogatzki-Zahn, E., Segelcke, D. and Zahn, P. (2018) Mechanisms of Acute and Chronic Pain after Surgery: Update from Findings in Experimental Animal Models. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology, 31, 575-585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Lim, H., Kim, B., Noh, G.J., et al. (2019) A Deep Neural Network-Based Pain Classifier Using a Photoplethysmography Signal. Sensors (Basel), 19, 384-399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Ye, J.J., Lee, K.T., Chou, Y.Y., et al. (2018) Assessing Pain Intensity Using Photoplethysmography Signals in Chronic Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Pain Practice, 18, 296-304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 何自静, 陈静, 李密. 盐酸羟考酮在乳腺癌改良根治手术后急性疼痛治疗中的应用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2016, 32(3): 255-257.
[6] Gulur, P. and Nelli, A. (2019) Persistent Postopera-tive Pain: Mechanisms and Modulators. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology, 32, 668-673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Habib, A.S., Kertai, M.D., Cooter, M., et al. (2019) Risk Factors for Severe Acute Pain and Persistent Pain after Surgery for Breast Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 44, 192-199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Subramaniam, S.D., Doss, B., Chanderasekar, L.D., et al. (2018) Scope of Physiological and Behavioural Pain Assessment Techniques in Children: A Review. Healthcare Technology Letters, 5, 124-129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Lee, J.H., Choi, B.M., Jung, Y.R., et al. (2019) Evaluation of Surgical Pleth Index and Analgesia Nociception Index as Surrogate Pain Measures in Conscious Postoperative Patients: An Observational Study. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Choi, B.M., Park, C., Lee, Y.H., et al. (2018) Development of a New Analgesic Index Using Nasal Photoplethysmography. Anaesthesia, 73, 1123-1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Yang, Y., Seok, H.S., Noh, G.J., et al. (2018) Postoperative Pain As-sessment Indices Based on Photoplethysmography Waveform Analysis. Frontiers in Physiology, 9, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Ye, J.J., Lee, K.T., Lin, J.S., et al. (2017) Observing Continuous Change in Heart Rate Variability and Photoplethysmography-Derived Parameters during the Process of Pain Produc-tion/Relief with Thermal Stimuli. Journal of Pain Research, 10, 527-533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef