经股内侧肌间隙入路治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的临床疗效观察
Clinical Observation of Knee Joint Osteoarthritis through the Medial Femoral Muscle Space Approach
摘要: 目的:对比经股内侧肌间隙入路及内侧髌旁入路进行膝关节置换术的临床疗效。方法:在我们研究中,采用经股内侧肌间隙入路及内侧髌旁入路进行膝关节置换术,分别对比手术时间、切口长度、出血量及住院时间,同时观察了术后不同时间膝关节ROM度数及HSS评分结果。结果:我们发现两种手术方式在手术时间、切口长度及住院时间方面没有差异性,然而具有更少的出血量。此外,我们进一步观察了膝关节ROM度数及HSS评分结果,发现在术后6 h及1 d,经股内侧肌间隙手术入路行手术患者具有更高的ROM度数及HSS评分,而在其他时间点两种手术方式结果没有差异性。结论:经股内侧肌间隙入路行膝关节置换术具有出血少和短期膝关节较好的功能恢复及较低的疼痛感觉,为患者远期的功能恢复提供一个良好的开端,减少贫血的发生率,建立术后锻炼的信心,加快功能恢复,改善生活质量,具有良好的社会及经济利益,值得应用及推广。
Abstract: Objective: To compare the clinical effect of knee arthroplasty with medial femoral muscle space approach and medial paracondylar approach. Methods: In our study, knee replacement was per-formed using the medial femoral muscle space approach and the medial paracondylar approach. The surgical time, incision length, bleeding volume, and length of hospital stay were compared, and the ROM degree and HSS score results of knee joints were observed at different times after surgery. Results: We found that there was no difference in surgical time, incision length, and length of hospital stay (p > 0.05), but there was less bleeding compared to the medial paracondylar approach (p < 0.05). In addition, we further observed the ROM and HSS scores of knee joints, and found that patients who underwent surgery through the medial femoral space surgery had higher ROM scores and HSS scores at 6 h and 1 d (p < 0.05), and there was no difference at other time points in the results of this surgical approach (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The knee arthroplasty via the medial femoral muscle space approach has less bleeding and better functional recovery and lower pain in the early postoperative period, which provides a good start for patients with long-term functional recovery, reduces the incidence of anemia, establishes confidence in postoperative exercise, speeds up functional recovery, improves quality of life, has good social and economic benefits, and is worthy of application and promotion.
文章引用:牛建兵, 陈昊, 杨金三, 高凯. 经股内侧肌间隙入路治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的临床疗效观察[J]. 临床医学进展, 2020, 10(3): 252-259. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2020.103040

参考文献

[1] 段虹昊, 肖琳, 李辉, 郭浩, 马建兵. 全膝关节置换术与单髁置换术治疗老年膝关节骨关节炎的疗效比较[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2017, 17(13): 2463-2465 + 2511.
[2] 张浩, 赵波. 全膝关节置换术和单踝置换术治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的效果及对肢体功能的影响[J]. 解放军医药杂志, 2017, 29(8): 34-37.
[3] 卓映宏, 章晓云, 陈跃平. 膝关节骨性关节炎外科治疗研究进展[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2018, 27(28): 3189-3192.
[4] 赵耀, 许新忠, 祁雷, 荆珏华. 人工全膝关节置换术治疗晚期膝关节骨性关节炎的临床疗效[J]. 实用医药杂志, 2017, 34(9): 783-786.
[5] Fransen, M., Agaliotis, M., Nairn, L., Votrubec, M., Bridgett, L., Su, S., Jan, S., March, L., Edmonds, J., Norton, R., Woodward, M. and Day, R.O. (2014) Glucosamine and Chondroitin for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Double Blind Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating Single and Combination Regimens. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 74, 851-858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Moskowitz, R.W. 骨关节炎——诊断与治疗[M]. 王学谦, 主译. 天津: 天津科技翻译出版公司, 2005: 292.
[7] 李宗军, 王远贺, 厉亚男, 等. 全膝关节置换术治疗内翻型膝关节骨性关节炎效果[J]. 齐鲁医学杂志, 2015, 30(2): 198-199
[8] Insall, J.N., Scott, W.N. 膝关节外科学[M]. 吕厚山, 译. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2006: 1532.
[9] 林治平, 汤炀炀, 谭宏昌, 康毅, 郑鸿. 单髁置换术与全膝关节置换术治疗膝单间室骨性关节炎的疗效比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2016, 31(4): 424-425.
[10] 席立成, 李宏宇. 膝关节骨性关节炎治疗方法的研究进展[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2015, 8(9): 884-887.
[11] 谭光华. 全膝人工表面关节置换术治疗晚期膝关节疾病的临床疗效观察[J]. 中外医学研究, 2012, 10(13): 5-6.
[12] 赵恩哲, 吴斗, 梁伟, 郑艮强, 郜振武. 膝关节骨关节炎手术治疗进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(8): 1392-1396.
[13] 黄威, 马锐祥, 张林林, 徐泽, 李守民, 孔荣, 朱晨. 经股内侧肌下入路与内侧髌旁入路行初次膝关节置换术的早期临床结果对比[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019, 35(16): 2551-2554.
[14] 刘韬, 杨建惠, 吴敏艳. 膝关节单髁置换术与全膝关节置换术治疗单间室膝骨关节炎近中期疗效[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2019, 48(14): 1703-1704.
[15] Chiang, H., Lee, C.-C., Lin, W.-P. and Jiang, C.-C. (2012) Comparison of Quadri-ceps-Sparing Minimally Invasive and Medial Parapatellar Total Knee Arthroplasty: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 111, 698-704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]