朋友圈为何设置三天可见?——短暂内容分享的影响因素与后效
Why Is the WeChat Moments Set to Be Visible for Three Days?—The Antecedent and Consequences of Ephemeral Content Sharing
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2020.103039, PDF,    国家社会科学基金支持
作者: 张尚贤, 支愧云, 黄惠珍:重庆大学公共管理学院,重庆
关键词: 短暂内容分享网络社会支持网络人际信任Sharing Ephemeral Content Online Social Support Online Interpersonal Trust
摘要: 短暂内容分享是指社交媒体用户在社交网站中发布文本、图片和视频等信息,并将这些信息设置为在短暂的时间内显示。本文从心理学的角度出发,通过回顾国内外短暂内容分享的相关研究,发现用户短暂内容分享的影响因素包括:认知评估、网络人际信任、情绪唤醒、人格。短暂内容分享会对用户的情绪效价、网络社会支持、友谊质量产生影响。未来学者可以对短暂内容分享的维度划分、问卷编制、使用频率和内容对用户和受众的双向影响等方面进行研究。
Abstract: According to the definition of short-lived content abroad and the characteristics of the three-day circle of friends, this article defines sharing ephemeral content as social media users posting in-formation such as text, pictures and videos on social networking sites, and setting this information to display in a short time. From the perspective of psychology, this paper reviews the related re-search on sharing ephemeral content at home and abroad, and finds that factors affecting user sharing ephemeral content include cognitive assessment, online interpersonal trust, emotional arousal, and personality. Sharing ephemeral content will have an impact on users' emotional va-lence, online social support, and friendship quality. We propose several directions for future re-search, including the dimensions of sharing ephemeral content, questionnaires, impact on users and audiences by intensity and content of sharing ephemeral content.
文章引用:张尚贤, 支愧云, 黄惠珍 (2020). 朋友圈为何设置三天可见?——短暂内容分享的影响因素与后效. 心理学进展, 10(3), 303-309. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.103039

参考文献

[1] 黄璐, 吴娜, 游志麒, 刘光大, 周宗奎(2016). 情绪体验与社交网站使用行为的关系: 基于新浪微博的研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(3), 409-412.
[2] 聂勇浩, 罗景月(2013). 感知有用性、信任与社交网站用户的个人信息披露意愿. 图书情报知识, (5), 89-97.
[3] 牛更枫, 鲍娜, 范翠英, 周宗奎, 孔繁昌, 孙晓军(2015). 社交网站中的自我呈现对自尊的影响: 社会支持的中介作用. 心理科学, (4), 939-945.
[4] 中国互联网络信息中心(2019). 中国互联网络发展状况统计报告. http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201902/P0201 90318523029756345.pdf
[5] Ahn, H., Kwolek, E. A., & Bowman, N. D. (2015). Two Faces of Narcissism on SNS: The Distinct Effects of Vulnerable and Grandiose Narcissism on SNS Privacy Control. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 375-381.[CrossRef
[6] Alt, D. (2015). College Students’ Academic Motivation, Media En-gagement and Fear of Missing Out. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 111-119.[CrossRef
[7] Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Falk, E. B. (2016). Sharing the Small Moments: Ephemeral Social Interaction on Snapchat. Information Communication & Society, 19, 956-977.[CrossRef
[8] Burrow, A. L., & Rainone, N. (2017). How Many Likes Did I Get?: Purpose Moderates Links between Positive Social Media Feedback and Self-Esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 232-236.[CrossRef
[9] Chen, K. J., & Cheung, H. L. (2019). Unlocking the Power of Ephe-meral Content: The Roles of Motivations, Gratification, Need for Closure, and Engagement. Computers in Human Beha-vior, 97, 67-74.[CrossRef
[10] Choi, J., Jung, J., & Lee, S. W. (2013). What Causes Users to Switch from a Local to a Global Social Network Site? The Cultural, Social, Economic, and Motivational Factors of Facebook’s Globalization. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2265-2673.[CrossRef
[11] Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2010). Who Interacts on the Web?: The Intersection of Users’ Personality and Social Media Use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247-253.[CrossRef
[12] Davis, R. A. (2001). A Cognitive-Behavioral Model of Pathological Internet Use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 187-195.[CrossRef
[13] Donath, J. (2007). Signals in Social Supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 231-251.[CrossRef
[14] Eşkisua, M., Hoşoğlua, R., & Rasmussenb, K. (2017). An Investigation of the Relationship between Facebook Usage, Big Five, Self-Esteem and Narcissism. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 294-301.[CrossRef
[15] Gable, S. L., Reis, H.T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What Do You Do When Things Go Right? the Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Benefits of Sharing Positive Events. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 87, 228-245.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Green, T., Wilhelmsen, T., Wilmots, E., Dodd, B., & Quinn, S. (2016). Social Anxiety, Attributes of Online Communication and Self-Disclosure across Private and Public Facebook Communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 206-213.[CrossRef
[17] Hepach, R., Kliemann, D., Gruneisen, S., Heekeren, H. R., & Dzio-bek, I. (2011). Conceptualizing Emotions Along the Dimensions of Valence, Arousal, and Communicative Frequency: Implications for Social-Cognitive Tests and Training Tools. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1-9.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond Being There. Proceedings of CHI, 119-125.[CrossRef
[19] Huang, H. Y. (2016). Examining the Beneficial Effects of Individual’s Self-Disclosure on the Social Network Site. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 122-132.[CrossRef
[20] Hughes, D. J., Rowe, M., Batey, M., & Lee, A. (2012). A Tale of Two Sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the Personality Predictors of Social Media Usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 561-569.[CrossRef
[21] Joinson, A. N., Reips, U. D., Buchanan, T., & Schofield, C. B. P. (2010). Privacy, Trust, and Self-Disclosure Online. Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 1-24. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ref/10.1080/07370020903586662
[22] Kaun, A., & Stiernstedt, F. (2014). Facebook Time: Technological and Institutional Affordances for Media Memories. New Media & Society, 16, 1154-1168.[CrossRef
[23] Kok, B. E., Coffey, K. A., Cohn, M. A., Catalino, L. I., Vachar-kulksemsuk, T., Algoe, S. B. et al. (2013). How Positive Emotions Build Physical Health: Perceived Positive Social Con-nections Account for the Upward Spiral between Positive Emotions and Vagal Tone. Psychological Science, 24, 1123-1132.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D. S., Lin, N. et al. (2013). Facebook Use Predicts Declines in Subjective Well-Being in Young Adults. PLoS ONE, 8, e69841.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Leer, E. V., Hapner, E. R., & Connor, N. P. (2008). Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change Applied to Voice Therapy. Journal of Voice, 22, 688-698.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Lomanowska, A. M., & Guitton, M. J. (2016). Online Intimacy and Well-Being in the Digital Age. Internet Interventions, 4, 138-144.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Mckenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Re-lationship Formation on the Internet: What’s the Big Attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-31.[CrossRef
[28] Pang, H. (2018). WeChat Use Is Significantly Correlated with College Students’ Quality of Friendships But Not with Perceived Well-Being. Heliyon, 4, e00967.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Roloff, M. E. (1981). Interpersonal Communication: The Social Exchange Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
[30] Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and Motivations Associated with Facebook Use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578-586.[CrossRef
[31] Shchebetenko, S. (2019). Do Personality Characteristics Explain the Associations between self-Esteem and Online Social Networking Behaviour? Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 17-23.[CrossRef
[32] Stoeber, J., Sherry, S. B., & Nealis, L. J. (2015). Multidi-mensional Perfectionism and Narcissism: Grandiose or Vulnerable? Personality and Individual Differences, 80, 85-90.[CrossRef
[33] Turner, W., Grube, J. A., & Meyers, J. (2001). Developing an Op-timal Match within Online Communities: An Exploration of CMC Support Communities and Traditional Support. Journal of Communication, 51, 231-251.[CrossRef
[34] Utz, S., & Krämer, N. C. (2009). The Privacy Paradox on Social Network Sites Revisited: The Role of Individual Characteristics and Group Norms. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3.
[35] Vaterlaus, J. M., Barnett, K., Roche, C., & Young, J. A. (2016). “Snapchat Is More Personal”: An Exploratory Study on Snapchat Behaviors and Young Adult Interpersonal Relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 594-601.[CrossRef
[36] Vincent, C. (2017). A Study of Negative Emotional Disclosure Beha-vior in Social Network Media: Will an Unexpected Negative Event and Personality Matter? Computers in Human Beha-vior, 73, 172-180.[CrossRef
[37] Vitak, J. (2012). The Impact of Context Collapse and Privacy on So-cial Network Site Disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 451-470.[CrossRef
[38] Wang, G., Zhang W., & Zeng, R. X. (2019). WeChat Use In-tensity and Social Support: The Moderating Effect of Motivators for WeChat Use. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 244-251.[CrossRef