贵州一次热低压辐合线型冰雹天气过程分析
Analysis on Hail Weather Process of Primary Heat and Low Pressure Convergent Line in Guizhou
DOI: 10.12677/CCRL.2020.92009, PDF,  被引量    国家科技经费支持
作者: 谢清霞, 万雪丽*, 庞庆兵:贵州省气象台,贵州 贵阳;林小杰:贵州省六盘水市气象局,贵州 六盘水;普卓玛:西藏日喀则市江孜县气象局,西藏 日喀则
关键词: 贵州冰雹热低压辐合线型Guizhou Hail Thermal Low Pressure Convergent Line
摘要: 利用多普勒雷达资料和Micaps资料,对贵州2017年4月5日贵州冰雹天气过程进行分析,揭示强对流天气的环流形势和影响系统,以及各种有利于大冰雹生成的因素和回波特征。分析发现:该次降雹属典型的贵州热低压辐合线型(或高空槽型),降雹区位于地面辐合线南侧,冰雹直径在10 mm以上的站数占总站数的61%,最大直径为20 mm;CAPE、SSI、K、Si指数和垂直风切变等大气对流参数很好地预示此次强对流天气的发生。本次过程具备适宜冰雹生长的0℃和−20℃层高度的条件,两层之间厚度3 km;这次雹暴具有强烈对流风暴的回波特征:反射率因子图上的弓形回波、悬垂结构、有界弱回波区、三体散射和中层径向辐合。贵阳回波定高为31.5 kft,强回波区高度扩展到−20℃层以上,垂直液态水含量最大值为8.03 kg/m2;5日EC模式给出了较好的预报结果,但是对于地面风场的预报明显低于实况,特别是安顺至贵阳北部的南风,模式预报6~8 m/s,实况13时持续增强到8~12 m/s,因此模式预报强降水落区比实际偏南,实际应用时需要根据地面实际风场分析辐合线位置及辐合强度,对落区进行订正。
Abstract: Using Doppler radar data and Micaps data, this paper analyzed the hail weather process in Guizhou on April 5, 2017, and revealed the circulation situation and influence system of severe convective weather, as well as various factors conducive to the generation of large hail and echo characteristics. It was found that the hail was a typical low-pressure convergence line (or high-slot type) of Guizhou heat, and the hail area was located in the south of the convergence line of the ground. The number of stations with a diameter of 10 mm or more accounted for 61% of the total stations, and the maximum diameter was 20 mm. Atmospheric convection parameters such as CAPE, SSI, K, Si index and vertical wind shear predicted the occurrence of severe convection weather. In this process, the height of 0˚C and −20˚C layers suitable for hail growth was obtained, and the thickness between the two layers was 3 km. This hailstorm has the echo characteristics of strong convective storm: bow echo, drapery structure, bounded weak echo region, Trisolarum scattering and intermediate radial convergence on the reflectivity factor diagram. The height of Guiyang echo was set at 31.5 kft, and the height of the strong echo zone expanded above the −20˚C layer. The maximum value of vertical liquid water content was 8.03 kg/m2. 5 EC model gives better prediction results, but for actual forecast is significantly lower than the ground wind field, especially in the north of Anshun to Guiyang south, model forecast 6~8 m/s, when live 13 continues to increase to 8 to 12 m/s, so the model forecast heavy rainfall area south, than the actual need ac-cording to the actual surface wind field analysis in actual applications convergence line position and intensity of convergence, the correction was carried out on the drop zone.
文章引用:谢清霞, 万雪丽, 庞庆兵, 林小杰, 普卓玛. 贵州一次热低压辐合线型冰雹天气过程分析[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2020, 9(2): 77-84. https://doi.org/10.12677/CCRL.2020.92009

参考文献

[1] 徐桂玉, 杨修群. 中国南方冰雹气候特征的三维EOF分析[J]. 热带气象学报, 2002, 18(4): 83-392.
[2] 伍志方, 叶爱芬, 胡胜, 等. 中小尺度天气系统的多普勒统计特征[J]. 热带气象学报, 2004, 20(4): 391-400.
[3] 施望芝, 金琪, 郭施, 等. 湖北一次冰雹天气过程的落区诊断分析和预报[J]. 热带气象学报, 2004, 20(2): 212-217.
[4] 胡胜, 汪瑛, 陈荣, 等. “雨燕”中风暴算法在北京奥运天气预报示范项目中的应用及改进[J]. 高原气象, 2009, 28(6): 1434-1442.
[5] 王华, 孙继松. 下垫面物理过程在北京地区强冰雹天气中的作用[J]. 气象, 2008, 34(3): 16-21.
[6] 李照荣, 付双喜, 李宝梓, 等. 冰雹云中闪电特征观测研究[J]. 热带气象学报, 2005, 21(6): 589-596.
[7] 姚叶青, 俞小鼎, 郝莹, 等. 两次强龙卷过程的环境背景场和多普勒雷达资料的对比分析[J]. 热带气象学报, 2007, 23(5): 483-490.
[8] 周后福, 郭品文, 翟箐. 两类强对流天气过程的模式模拟及其比较[J]. 热带气象学报, 2010, 26(3): 379-384.
[9] 周海光. 强热带风暴“风神”(0806)螺旋雨带中尺度结构双多普勒雷达的研究[J]. 热带气象学报, 2010, 26(3): 301-308.
[10] 俞小鼎, 姚秀萍, 熊挺南, 等. 多普勒天气雷达原理与业务应用[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2006: 92.
[11] 廖玉芳, 俞小鼎, 吴林林, 等. 强雹暴的雷达三体散射统计与个例分析[J]. 高原气象, 2007, 26(4): 813-819.
[12] 贵州省预报员手册第二稿[Z].