责任感与高中生学习投入的关系：一个多重中介模型
The Relationship between Sense of Responsibility and Academic Engagement in High School Students: A Multiple Mediator Model
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2020.103047, PDF,    国家社会科学基金支持
作者: 孙 颖, 燕良轼：湖南师范大学教育科学学院，湖南 长沙；徐 异：湖南师范大学教育科学学院，湖南 长沙；湖南人文科技学院教育学院，湖南 娄底
关键词: 责任感；学习投入；公正世界信念；自我效能感；Responsibility； Academic Engagement； Belief in a Just World； Self-Efficacy
摘要: 为探讨责任感、学习投入、公正世界信念以及自我效能感的关系，采用青少年个体责任感量表、学习投入量表、公正世界信念量表和积极心理资本问卷中的自我效能感分量表对951名高中生进行调查。结果表明：1) 责任感、学习投入、自我效能感与公正世界信念均存在显著正相关。2) 责任感可通过自我效能感和公正世界信念间接影响高中生学习投入。3) 自我效能感比公正世界信念在责任感与学习投入之间的中介作用效果更大。以上结果对提高高中生学习投入水平具有重要价值。
Abstract: To explore the relationship between responsibility, academic engagement, belief in a just world, and self-efficacy, by using the Personal Responsibility Scale, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-student, Belief in a Just World Scale and the Self-Efficacy Scale in Positive Psychological Capital Questionnaire among 951 high school students, this research examined the multiple mediation effect of belief in a just world and self-efficacy for the relationship between personality responsibility and academic engagement. The results showed that: 1) belief in a just world and self-efficacy were significantly positively related to academic engagement and the sense of responsibility; 2) belief in a just world and self-efficacy of high school students plays a parallel multiple-mediation role among the sense of responsibility and academic engagement; 3) the self-efficacy plays a stronger mediate role between the sense of responsibility and academic engagement more than the belief in a just world.
文章引用：孙颖, 徐异, 燕良轼 (2020). 责任感与高中生学习投入的关系：一个多重中介模型. 心理学进展, 10(3), 367-375. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.103047

参考文献

[1] A∙班杜拉, 吴棠(1987). 社会学习理论里的因果模式(特约稿). 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), (1), 1-12.
[2] 安宝珍(2007). 初中生社会责任感的调查研究. 教学与管理, (4), 41-43.
[3] 安晓爽(2017). 中学生家庭教养方式、自我控制与个人责任感的关系研究. 硕士论文. 福州: 福建师范大学.
[4] 方杰, 温忠麟, 张敏强, 任皓(2014). 基于结构方程模型的多层中介效应分析. 心理科学进展, 22(3), 530-539.
[5] 方杰, 温忠麟, 张敏强, 孙配贞(2014). 基于结构方程模型的多重中介效应分析. 心理科学, 37(3), 735-741.
[6] 方来坛, 时勘, 张风华(2008). 中文版学习投入量表的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(6), 618-620.
[7] 付进, 黎玉兰(2016). 广西民族地区初中生责任心特点及其与学业成就的关系. 广西师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 37(3), 134-138.
[8] 韩梅, 谷传华, 王慧, 薛雨康(2016). 初中生逆反心理与父母养育方式的关系: 人格的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, (4), 53-55.
[9] 黄四林, 韩明跃, 宁彩芳, 林崇德(2016). 大学生学校认同对责任感的影响: 自尊的中介作用. 心理学报, 48(6), 684-692.
[10] 蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 洪伟, 金芳凯(2019). 高中生数学能力实体观对数学学习投入的影响: 学业自我效能感和消极学业情绪的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 35(1), 48-56.
[11] 黎玉兰, 付进, 韦义平, 陈勇杰(2018). 初中生责任心对学业成就的影响:学业自我概念的中介作用. 基础教育研究, 497(19), 72-74+78.
[12] 李琼, 黄希庭(2012). 自我控制:内涵及其机制与展望. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 38(2), 41-52.
[13] 李永占(2018). 父母教养方式对高中生学习投入的影响: 一个链式中介效应模型. 心理发展与教育, 34(5), 576-585.
[14] 刘海涛, 郑雪, 聂衍刚(2011). 大学生社会责任感的发展特点及影响因素. 宁波大学学报(教育科学版), 33(3), 35-39.
[15] 刘在花(2017). 学校氛围对中学生学习投入的影响: 学校幸福感的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, (4), 85-90.
[16] 任萍, 张云运, 秦幸娜, 郭筱琳, 赵茜(2017). 初中生公正世界信念对其学业成就的影响: 感知的教师支持和班级公正的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(2), 191-197.
[17] 石雷山, 陈英敏, 侯秀, 高峰强(2013). 家庭社会经济地位与学习投入的关系: 学业自我效能的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 29(1), 71-78.
[18] 苏志强, 张大均, 王鑫强(2012). 公正世界信念量表的修订及在大学生应用的信效度研究. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 21(6), 561-563.
[19] 谭小宏, 秦启文(2005). 责任心的心理学研究与展望. 心理科学, 28(4), 991-994.
[20] 王小凤, 燕良轼(2019). 中学生良心与学业成就的关系: 学习投入的中介作用. 心理学探新, 39(1), 78-83.
[21] 燕良轼, 李亮, 卞军凤, 徐异(2018). 教育要聚焦于青少年的人性成长. 大学教育科学, 3(3), 14-21+123.
[22] 易梅, 田园, 明桦, 黄四林, 辛自强(2019). 公正世界信念与大学生社会责任感的关系: 人际信任的解释作用及其性别差异. 心理发展与教育, 35(3), 282-287.
[23] 岳永杰(2018). 中学生德育与智育融合初探.甘肃教育, (13), 31.
[24] 张阔, 张赛, 董颖红(2010). 积极心理资本: 测量及其与心理健康的关系. 心理与行为研究, 8(1), 58-64.
[25] 赵改, 孔繁昌, 刘诏君, 冯雅萌, 黄声普, 王亚丹, 周宗奎(2018). 父母情感温暖对青少年感恩的影响: 责任心与公正世界信念的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(3), 257-263.
[26] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[27] Bandura, A. (1978). The Self-System in Reciprocal Determinism. American Psychologist, 33, 344-358.[CrossRef] 
[28] Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.[CrossRef] 
[29] Dalbert, C. (1999). The World Is More Just for Me than Generally: About the Personal Belief in a Just World Scale’s Validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79-98.[CrossRef] 
[30] Dalbert, C., & Maes, J. (2002). Belief in a Just World as a Personal Resource in School. The Justice Motive in Everyday Life.[CrossRef] 
[31] Faccenda, L., & Pantaléon, N. (2011). Analysis of the Rela-tionships between Sensitivity to Injustice, Principles of Justice and Belief in a Just World. Journal of Moral Education, 40, 491-511.[CrossRef] 
[32] Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic Success among Students at Risk for School Failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221-234.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Hafer, C. L. (2000). Do Innocent Victims Threaten the Belief in a Just World? Evidence from a Modified Stroop Task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 165-173.[CrossRef] 
[34] Hellison, D. (1985). Goals and Strategies for Physical Education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
[35] Hellison, D. (2003). Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility in Physical Edu-cation. In S. Silverman, & C. Ennis (Eds.), Students Learning in Physical Education: Applying Research to Enhance In-struction (pp. 241-254). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
[36] Jiang, F., Yue, X., Lu, S., Yu, G., & Zhu, F. (2016). How Belief in a Just World Benefits Mental Health: The Effects of Optimism and Gratitude. Social Indicators Research, 126, 411-423.[CrossRef] 
[37] Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships be-tween Student Engagement and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An Interna-tional Journal, 46, 517-528.[CrossRef] 
[38] Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just World Research and the Attribution Process: Looking Back and Ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030-1051.[CrossRef] 
[39] Liu, R. D., Zhen, R., Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Jiang, R., & Xu, L. (2017). Teacher Support and Math Engagement: Roles of Academic Self-Efficacy and Positive Emotions. Educational Psychology, 38, 3-16.[CrossRef] 
[40] Mergler, A., & Patton, W. (2007). Adolescents Talking about Personal Responsibility. The Journal of Student Wellbeing, 1, 57-70.[CrossRef] 
[41] Mergler, A., & Shield, P. (2016). Development of the Personal Respon-sibility Scale for Adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 51, 50-57.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Ouweneel, E., Schaufeli, W. B., & Le Blanc, P. M. (2013). Believe, and You Will Achieve: Changes over Time in Self-Efficacy, Engagement, and Performance. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 5, 225-247.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Roth, J., & Steffens, M. C. (2014). When I Become We: Associative Self-Anchoring Drives Implicit Intergroup Bias in Minimal Groups. Social Psychology, 45, 253-264.[CrossRef] 
[44] Roth, R. A. (2013). High School Students in College-Level Classes: Associations between Engagement, Achievement, and Mental Health. Ph.D. Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.
[45] Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.[CrossRef] 
[46] Singg, S., & Ader, J. A. (2001). Development of the Student Personal Responsibility Scale-10. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 29, 331-335.[CrossRef] 
[47] Singg, S., Thomas, S., & Null, M. (2005). Relationship between Academic Dishonesty and Student Personal Responsibility. Unpublished Manuscript, San Angelo, TX: Angelo State Uni-versity.
[48] Steele, J. P., & Fullagar, C. J. (2009). Facilitators and Outcomes of Student Engagement in a College Setting. Journal of Psychology, 143, 5-27.[CrossRef]