柠檬酸淋洗修复黏性土壤重金属污染研究
Study on the Repair of Heavy Metal Pollution in Clay by Citric Acid Leaching
DOI: 10.12677/HJSS.2020.82013, PDF,   
作者: 向甲甲:上海市政工程设计研究总院(集团)有限公司,上海
关键词: 柠檬酸黏性土淋洗土壤修复Citric Acid Clay Leaching Soil Remediation
摘要: 土壤重金属污染日益严重,淋洗修复技术成为研究的热点。以柠檬酸淋洗黏性土壤重金属污染物,采用震荡淋洗法研究淋洗剂浓度、固液比、淋洗时间对Cu、Zn、Ni、Pb、As去除效果的影响,分析淋洗前后土壤基本理化性质的变化。结果表明:柠檬酸对黏性土壤重金属具有一定的淋洗效果,对复合重金属的去除能力依次为Cu > Zn > Ni > Pb > As;Cu和Ni受淋洗剂浓度影响较大;固液比通过影响黏土颗粒分散而影响淋洗效果;柠檬酸对重金属的快速反应阶段均在40 min内,在180 min达到淋洗平衡;柠檬酸淋洗后的黏性土壤孔隙率、有机质含量升高有利于土壤再利用过程中微生物的生长及繁衍。
Abstract: Soil heavy metal pollution is becoming more and more serious and leaching repair technology has become a hot topic. Heavy metal pollutants in clay were washed with citric acid. The effects of leaching agent concentration, solid-liquid ratio and leaching time on the removal efficiency of Cu, Zn, Ni, Pb and As were studied by shock leaching. The results showed that citric acid had a certain leaching effect on heavy metals in clay, and the removal capacity of complex heavy metals was Cu > Zn > Ni > Pb >As. Cu and Ni were greatly affected by the concentration of leaching agent. The solid-liquid ratio affects the leaching effect by affecting the dispersion of clay particles. The rapid reaction stage of citric acid to heavy metals was all within 40 min and the elution equilibrium was reached at 180 min. The increase of porosity and organic matter content after citric acid leaching was beneficial to the growth and reproduction of microorganisms in the process of soil reuse.
文章引用:向甲甲. 柠檬酸淋洗修复黏性土壤重金属污染研究[J]. 土壤科学, 2020, 8(2): 82-89. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJSS.2020.82013

参考文献

[1] 生态环境部. 2017中国生态环境状况公报[EB/OL].
http://www.zhb.gov.cn/hjzl/zghjzkgb/1 nzghjzkgb/201805/P02018053153464 5032372.pdf, 2018-04-25.
[2] 串丽敏, 赵同科, 郑怀国, 等. 土壤重金属污染修复技术研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2014, 37(S2): 213-222.
[3] 于兵, 门明新, 刘霈珈, 等. 有机酸对重金属污染土壤的淋洗效果[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018(13): 67.
[4] Yang, X., Mao, X., Shao, X., et al. (2018) Enhanced Techniques of Soil Washing for the Remediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils. Agricultural Research, 7, 99-104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 黄川, 李柳, 黄珊, 等. 重金属污染土壤的草酸和EDTA混合淋洗研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2014, 8(8): 3480-3486.
[6] Gao, R., Zhu, P., Guo, G., et al. (2016) Efficiency of Several Leaching Reagents on Removal of Cu, Pb, Cd, and Zn from Highly Contaminated Paddy Soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 23271-23280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Tessier, A., Compbell, P.G. and Bisson, M. (1979) Sequential Extraction Procedure for the Speciation of Particulate Trace Metals. Analytical Chemistry, 51, 844-851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 李玉双, 胡晓钧, 宋雪英, 等. 柠檬酸对重金属复合污染土壤的淋洗修复效果与机理[J]. 沈阳大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 24(2): 6-9.
[9] 刘冠男, 陈明, 李悟庆, 等. 土壤中砷的形态及其连续提取方法研究进展[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(12): 2629-2638.
[10] 向玥皎, 刘阳生. 柠檬酸、草酸对污染土壤中铅锌的静态浸提实验研究[J]. 环境工程, 2015, 33(9): 153-157.
[11] 许端平, 李晓波, 孙璐. 有机酸对土壤中Pb和Cd淋洗动力学特征及去除机理[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2015, 15(3): 261-266.
[12] 刘志强, 陈廷廷, 张晓霞. 柠檬酸对土壤中重金属形态转化的影响[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2019, 39(14): 108-109.
[13] 芮大虎, 武迎飞, 陈雪, 杨健辉, 伊藤. 复合冻融与淋洗方法修复重金属污染黏性土的研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(2): 286-293.
[14] 陈欣园, 仵彦卿. 不同化学淋洗剂对复合重金属污染土壤的修复机理[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(10): 2845-2854.
[15] Bento, F.M., Camargo, F.A.O., Okeke, B.C., et al. (2005) Comparative Bioremediation of Soils Contaminated with Diesel Oil by Natural Attenuation, Biostimulation and Bioaugmentation. Bioresource Technology, 96, 1049-1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]