淮南矿区地下水水化学组成及其水文地质意义
Hydrochemistry of Groundwater from the Huainan Coalfield and Their Hydrological Implications
DOI: 10.12677/OJNS.2020.83017, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘谭杰, 许光泉:安徽理工大学地球与环境学院,安徽 淮南;孙林华*:安徽理工大学地球与环境学院,安徽 淮南;宿州学院资源与土木工程学院,安徽 宿州
关键词: 水文地球化学含水层差异性离子来源分析水岩相互作用Hydrochemistry Aquifer Difference Source of Major Ions Water Rock Interaction
摘要: 为查明淮南矿区不同含水层(松散、煤系砂岩和太原组灰岩含水层)地下水的水文地球化学组成及其影响因素,在系统收集资料的基础上,对其常规离子组成进行了综合分析。结果表明,三个含水层地下水的水化学组成存在差异,表明其水化学组成控制因素(主要离子来源)互不相同。其水化学类型以Na-Cl型和Na-HCO3型为主,反映矿区整体处于排泄区域或地下水补给不充分。Gibbs图、离子之间的相互关系及因子分析结果表明硅酸盐矿物的风化和含Ca、Mg氯盐矿物的溶解(源1)以及含Na硫酸盐及氯盐矿物的溶解(源2)是水化学组成的主要贡献来源。这一结果在Unmix模型分析中得到了进一步的证实,且Unmix模型分析结果表明源1对煤系砂岩含水层地下水贡献率最高,而源2对松散含水层地下水贡献率最高。
Abstract: For getting the information about the hydrogeochemical compositions and influencing factors of groundwater in different aquifers (loose layer, coal-bearing sandstone and limestone aquifer of Taiyuan formation) in Huainan coalfield, the major ion concentrations of groundwater have been analyzed by a series of methods based on the systematic collection of data. The results show that the hydrochemical compositions of groundwater from the three aquifers are different from each other, indicating that the controlling factors (sources of major ions) of hydrochemical compositions are different from each other. The main hydrochemical types are Na-Cl and Na-HCO3 types, reflecting that the study area is located in the drainage area or the groundwater supply is insufficient. Gibbs diagram, the relationship between major ions and factor analysis suggest that the weathering of silicate minerals, the dissolution of Ca and Mg containing chloride minerals (source 1) and the dissolution of Na containing sulfate and chloride minerals (source 2) are the main contribution sources of hydrochemistry. The result has been further confirmed by the analysis of UNMIX model, and the results of UNMIX model analysis also show that the groundwater from the coal-bearing sandstone aquifer has the highest contribution from the source 1, whereas the groundwater from the loose layer aquifer has the highest contribution from the source 2.
文章引用:刘谭杰, 许光泉, 孙林华. 淮南矿区地下水水化学组成及其水文地质意义[J]. 自然科学, 2020, 8(3): 104-111. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJNS.2020.83017

参考文献

[1] 中国地下水科学战略研究小组. 中国地下水科学的机遇与挑战[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
[2] 桂和荣, 姚恩亲, 宋晓梅, 等. 矿井水资源化技术研究[M]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学出版社, 2011.
[3] 桂和荣, 陈陆望. 矿区地下水水文地球化学演化与识别[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2007.
[4] 武强, 董书宁, 张志龙. 矿井水害防治[M]. 北京: 中国矿业大学出版社, 2007.
[5] 王广才, 段琦, 卜昌森, 等. 水文地球化学方法在煤矿水害研究中的某些应用——以平顶山、肥城矿区研究为例[J]. 地质论评, 2001, 47(6): 653-657.
[6] 冯利军, 李竞生, 邵改群. 具有线性功能函数的神经元在矿井水质类型识别中的应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2002, 30(4): 35-37.
[7] 张许良, 张子戌, 彭苏萍. 数量化理论在矿井突(涌)水水源判别中的应用[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2003, 32(3): 251-254.
[8] 宫凤强,鲁金涛. 基于主成分分析与距离判别分析法的突水水源识别方法[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2014, 31(2): 236-242.
[9] 温廷新, 张波, 邵良杉. 矿井突水水源识别的QGA-LSSVM模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(7): 111-116.
[10] 周健, 史秀志, 王怀勇. 矿井突水水源识别的距离判别分析模型[J]. 煤炭学报, 2010, 35(2): 278-282.
[11] 陈松, 桂和荣, 孙林华, 等. 灰岩含水层中稀土元素在地下水与围岩间的分异: 以皖北任楼煤矿太原组灰岩含水层为例[J]. 现代地质, 2011, 25(4): 802-807.
[12] 黄平华, 陈建生, 宁超. 焦作矿区地下水中氢氧同位素分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2012, 37(5): 770-775.
[13] Gui, H. and Sun, L. (2013) Chemistry of Groundwater from the Taiyuan Formation Aquifer in Liuyi Coal Mine, Northern Anhui Province, China and Its Implications for Water Rock Interaction in Deep Seated Environment. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 15, 5941-5944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Sun, L. and Gui, H. (2013) Groundwater Quality and Evo-lution in a Deep Limestone Aquifer, Northern Anhui Province, China: Evidence from Hydrochemistry. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 22, 1126-1131.
[15] Sun, L., Gui, H. and Peng, W. (2014) Heavy Metals in Groundwater from the Wolonghu Coal Mine, Northern Anhui Province, China and Their Hydrological Implications. Water Prac-tice & Technology, 9, 79-87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 袁亮, 刘泽功. 淮南矿区开采煤层顶板抽放瓦斯技术的研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2003, 28(2): 149-152.
[17] 张国成, 熊明富, 郭卫星, 汤友谊. 淮南矿区井田小构造对煤与瓦斯突出的控制作用[J]. 焦作工学院学报 (自然科学版), 2003, 22(5): 329-333.
[18] 方良才. 淮南矿区瓦斯卸压抽采理论与应用技术[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2010, 38(8): 56-62.
[19] 黄晖, 蒋法文, 韩必武, 张平松. 淮南矿区A组煤层底板灰岩钻孔瓦斯喷孔综合探查分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(11): 1988-1992.
[20] 万宗启, 李平, 翟艳鹏, 徐超, 刘桂建. 淮南煤田潘北煤矿4-1煤层瓦斯组分和碳同位素特征及其成因意义[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2015, 27(5): 20-23.
[21] 傅先杰. 淮南煤田太原组灰岩岩溶地下水化学场特征[J]. 安徽理工大学学报 (自然科学版), 2015, 35(2): 72-77.
[22] 汪子涛, 刘启蒙, 刘瑜. 淮南煤田地下水水化学空间分布及其形成作用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2019, 47(5): 40-47.
[23] Gibbs, R.J. (1970) Mechanisms Controlling World Water Chemistry. Science, 170, 1088-1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Nagaraju, A., Balaji, E., Sun, L. and Thejaswi, A. (2018) Processes Controlling Groundwater Chemistry from Mulakalacheruvu Area, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh, South India: A Statistical Approach Based on Hydrochemistry. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 91, 425-430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Sun, L., Chen, S. and Gui, H. (2016) Source Iden-tification of Inrush Water Based on Groundwater Hydrochemistry and Statistical Analysis. Water Practice and Technology, 11, 448-458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Yin, H. and Yang, W. (2014) Source Apportionment of PAHs Using Unmix Model for Yantai Costal Surface Sediments, China. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 92, 30-35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Tóth, J. (1999) Groundwater as a Geologic Agent: An Over-view of the Causes, Processes, and Manifestations. Hydrogeology Journal, 7, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Sun, L. and Gui, H. (2012) Establishment of Water Source Dis-crimination Model in Coal Mine by Using Hydrogeochemistry and Statistical Analysis: A Case Study from Renlou Coal Mine in Northern Anhui Province, China. Journal of Coal Science & Technology (China), 18, 385-389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] An, S., Jiang, C., Zhang, W., Chen, X. and Zheng, L. (2020) Influencing Factors of the Hydrochemical Characteristics of Surface Water and Shallow Groundwater in the Sub-sidence Area of the Huainan Coalfield. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef