2套30 m分辨率土地覆被遥感数据类别精度及空间一致性特征研究
The Category Accuracy and Spatial Consistence Characteristic Analysis for Two 30 m Resolution Land Cover Products in China
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2020.104027, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 雷海梅, 孙庆松, 宋宏利*:河北工程大学地球科学与工程学院,河北 邯郸;张晓楠:河北工程大学矿业与测绘工程学院,河北 邯郸
关键词: 中国区域土地覆被数据精度评价类别空间一致性China Land Cover Products Accuracy Evaluation Category Spatial Consistence
摘要: 土地覆被数据是自然资源管理、城市规划、气候模拟、环境保护建模等领域的重要信息,对其进行精度评价并揭示其类别混淆特征对于众多科学领域具有重要意义。本文以中国研发的2套30米分辨率全球尺度土地覆被数据Globeland30和FROM-GLC-Hierarchy数据为研究对象,以国际组织发布的验证数据为参考,从国家、区域及类别尺度进行了比较和评价,探索了空间一致性随地形的变化特征。结果表明:2套数据的林地、耕地、水体三种类别均具有较高的分类精度,Globeland30的草地具有较高的用户精度和制图精度,林业、农业及水资源领域研究可以选择二者作为基础数据源,草地科学研究可以选择Globeland30作为基础数据源。2套数据的类别空间不一致性与高程具有典型的正相关,其不一致比例随着高程的增加明显增大,在1500 m以上区域,二者的类别不一致性比例最大,达到了42.91%;二者类别不一致性区域主要位于2~15度之间,其面积接近占60%,2度以下区域不一致性最低,约占7.09%。研究表明地形条件是影响大尺度土地覆被制图的重要因素,因此,未来应进一步加强高海拔及景观异质性区域土地覆被分类算法的研发。
Abstract: Land cover map is vital for research and applications concerning natural resource and environ-mental modeling, so assessment of their category accuracy and category confusion is very important for some specific applications. Using the existing referenced data from international organization, we compared the category accuracy and spatial consistency from national and regional scale, and explore the change characteristic of spatial heterogeneity. The results show that, forest, cropland and water category all have the high Producer's Accuracy and User’s Accuracy, so these two data can be as input land cover data for forest, cropland and water scientific regions. The category heterogeneity shows a significant positive correlation with the elevation; above 1500 m, the percent of category inconformity is up to 42.91%, and inconformity mainly appears in 2~15 degrees, with areas occupying nearly 60%; below 2 degrees, the percent of category inconformity is minimum, only 7.09%. In the future, we should put more attention on the classification algorithm in heterogeneous areas.
文章引用:雷海梅, 张晓楠, 孙庆松, 宋宏利. 2套30 m分辨率土地覆被遥感数据类别精度及空间一致性特征研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2020, 10(4): 291-301. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2020.104027

参考文献

[1] 陈军, 陈晋, 廖安平, 等. 全球30m地表覆盖遥感制图的总体技术[J]. 测绘学报, 2014, 43(6): 551-557.
[2] 陈利军, 陈军, 廖安平, 等. 30m全球地表覆盖遥感分类方法初探[J]. 测绘通报, 2012(S1): 350-353.
[3] Verburg, P.H., Neu-mann, K. and Nol, L. (2011) Challenges in Using Land Use and Land Cover Data for Global Change Studies. Global Change Biology, 17, 974-989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Mayaux, P., Eva, H., Gallego, J., et al. (2006) Validation of the Global Land Cover 2000 Map. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 44, 1728-1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Stehman, S., Olofsson, P., Woodcock, C., et al. (2012) A Global Land-Cover Validation Data Set, II: Augmenting a Stratified Sampling Design to Estimate Accuracy by Region and Land-Cover Class. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 33, 6975-6993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Chen, X.Y., Lin, Y., Zhang, M., et al. (2017) Assessment of the Cropland Classifications in Four Global Land Cover Datasets: A Case Study of Shaanxi Province, China. Journal of Integra-tive Agriculture, 16, 298-311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Grekousis, G., Mountrakis, G. and Kavouras, M. (2015) An Overview of 21 Global and 43 Regional Land-Cover Mapping Products. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 36, 5309-5335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Loveland, T.R., Reed, B.C., Brown, J.F., et al. (2000) Develop-ment of a Global Land Cover Characteristics Database and IGBP Discover from 1 km AVHRR Data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 1303-1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Friedl, M.A., Sullamenashe, D., Tan, B., et al. (2010) MODIS Collec-tion 5 Global Land Cover: Algorithm Refinements and Characterization of New Datasets. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 168-182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Olivier, A., Patrice, B., Frederic, A., et al. (2008) The Most Detailed Portrait of Earth. ESA Bulletin. Bulletin ASE. European Space Agency, 2008, 24-31.
[11] Lamarche, C., Bontemps, S., Verhegghen, A., et al. (2013) Characterizing the Surface Dynamics for Land Cover Mapping: Current Achievements of the ESA CCI Land Cover. ESA Special Publication.
[12] Kasimu, A. (2011) Production of Global Land Cover Da-ta—GLCNMO. Journal of Geography & Geology, 4, 22-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Gong, P., Wang, J., Yu, L., et al. (2013) Finer Resolution Observation and Monitoring of Global Land Cover: First Mapping Results with Landsat TM and ETM+ Data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34, 2607-2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Chen, J., Ban, Y. and Li, S. (2015) China: Open Access to Earth Land-Cover Map. Nature, 514, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Yu, L., Wang, J. and Gong, P. (2013) Improving 30m Global Land-Cover Map FROM-GLC with Time Series MODIS and Auxiliary Data Sets: A Segmentation-Based Approach. International Journal for Remote Sensing, 34, 5851-5867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Yu, L., Wang, J., Clinton, N., et al. (2013) FROM-GC: 30 m Global Cropland Extent Derived through Multisource Data Integration. International Journal of Digital Earth, 6, 521-533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 俞乐, 王杰, 李雪草, 等. 基于多源数据集成的多分辨率全球地表覆盖制图[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2014(8): 1646-1660.
[18] Arsanjani, J.J., Tayyebi, A. and Vaz, E. (2016) Glo-beLand30 as an Alternative Fine-Scale Global Land Cover Map: Challenges, Possibilities, and Implications for Developing Countries. Habitat International, 55, 25-31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] See, L., Laso Bayas, J., Schepaschenko, D., et al. (2017) LACO-Wiki: A New Online Land Cover Validation Tool Demonstrated Using GlobeLand30 for Kenya. Remote Sensing, 9, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Sun, B., Chen, X. and Zhou, Q. (2016) Uncertainty Assessment of GLOBELAND30 Land Cover Data Set Over Central Asia. ISPRS International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 41, 1313-1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Yang, Y., Xiao, P., Feng, X., et al. (2017) Accuracy As-sessment of Seven Global Land Cover Datasets over China. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 125, 156-173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 陆苗, 吴文斌, 张莉, 等. 不同耕地数据集在中国区域的对比研究[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2016, 46(11): 1459.
[23] 冉有华, 李新. 全球第一个综合高分辨率土地覆盖图——中国30m分辨率全球土地覆盖图评述[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2015, 45(8): 1243-1244.
[24] Foody, G.M. (2010) Assessing the Accuracy of Land Cover Change with Imperfect Ground Reference Data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 2271-2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] 宋宏利, 张晓楠. 国家尺度异源土地覆被遥感产品精度评价[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2018, 30(3): 26-32.
[26] 宋宏利, 张晓楠, 王雨, 等. 多尺度高分辨率全球土地覆被遥感产品相对一致性比较[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(15): 118-124.
[27] 宋宏利, 张晓楠. 中国区域多源土地覆被遥感产品精度分析与验证[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(22): 207-214.
[28] 高玄彧. 地貌基本形态的主客分类法[J]. 山地学报, 2004, 22(3): 261-266.
[29] Congalton, R.G. (1998) A Review of Assessing the Accuracy of Classification of Remotely Sensed Data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37, 270-279.