高水土压力下盾构刀盘安全性分析与降水方案研究
Safety Analysis and Reduce Water Measures of Shield Cutterhead under Large Depth and High Water Pressure
DOI: 10.12677/HJCE.2020.94034, PDF,   
作者: 杨 云:中铁十五局集团城市轨道交通工程有限公司,河南 洛阳
关键词: 泥水盾构刀盘有限元分析高水压大埋深降水措施Slurry Shield Cutterhead Finite Element Analysis High Water Pressure Deep Burial Depth Precipitation Measures
摘要: 某引水隧道使用泥水盾构施工,隧道较长且隧道埋深大、水压高,为保证在大埋深、长距离掘进时刀盘结构的安全,采用经验公式计算出不同埋深的水土压力值,对掘进过程中面临的四种典型工况进行了刀盘的有限元强度分析;采用MSC Patran/Nastran软件得出了四种工况下刀盘结构的应力与位移并验证了数值解的正确性,找出刀盘结构的强度薄弱点,针对部分区域水土压力过大进行降水试验并制定了详尽的降水措施。结果表明:通过分析不同埋深、水压作用下刀盘的变形量,结果显示刀盘面板在承压1.4 MPa时已经达到最大值,刀盘在牛腿与前面板连接处最大应力为227 MPa,此时要采取措施降水压,降水措施可以满足施工安全要求;给施工提供技术参考,提高了刀盘掘进过程的整体安全可靠性,保证长距离掘进施工安全。
Abstract: A draw water tunnel is constructed using slurry shields. The tunnel is long and the tunnel is deep and the water pressure is high. To ensure the safety of cutterhead structure in large buried depth and long-distance tunneling, the finite element strength analysis of cutterhead under four typical working conditions is carried out. Calculating the water and soil pressure of different buried depths by empirical formula, then the stress and displacement of the cutterhead structure under four working conditions are obtained by using MSC Patran/Nastran software, and the weak points of the cutterhead structure are found out. The results show that the deformation of cutterhead under different buried depth and water pressure has reached its maximum value at 1.4 MPa, and the maximum stress of cutter head at the joint of corbel and front panel is 227 MPa. At this time, measures should be taken to reduce the water pressure, and the precipitation measures can well meet the construction safety requirements. It can provide the technical reference for the construc-tion, improve the overall safety and reliability of the cutterhead tunneling process, and ensure the safety of long-distance tunneling construction.
文章引用:杨云. 高水土压力下盾构刀盘安全性分析与降水方案研究[J]. 土木工程, 2020, 9(4): 311-320. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJCE.2020.94034

参考文献

[1] 王旭, 张海东, 边野, 等. 盾构机刀盘的地质适应性设计研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2013, 50(3): 108-114.
[2] Rostami, J. (2010) Hard Rock TBM Cutterhead Modeling for Design and Performance Prediction. Geomechanics and Tunnelling, 1, 18-28.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 谢燕琴, 刘进, 张魁. 基于轴承等效刚度法的TBM盘形滚刀模态分析[J]. 现代制造工程, 2019(2): 154-160.
[4] 张家年, 胡玉娟. 成都富水砂卵石地层盾构刀盘设计及应用[J]. 隧道建设, 2014, 34(12): 1202-1206.
[5] 周阳宗, 聂羽飞, 李杰, 等. 某型复合盾构刀盘的有限元静动态特性分析与优化[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2015, 52(3): 144-149+159.
[6] Geng, Q., Wei, Z., Meng, H., et al. (2016) Mechanical Performance of TBM Cutterhead in Mixed Rock Ground Conditions. Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology Incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 57, 76-84.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Han, M.D., Cai, Z.X., Qu, C.Y., et al. (2017) Dynamic Nu-merical Simulation of Cutterhead Loads in TBM Tunnelling. Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology, 70, 286-298.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 夏毅敏, 朱湘衡, 林赉贶, 杨妹. TBM刀盘掘进载荷影响因素研究[J]. 现代制造工程, 2015(9): 1-6+33.
[9] 孙涛. 盾构滚刀破岩仿真与刀盘受力特性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 石家庄铁道大学, 2015.
[10] 管会生. 土压平衡盾构机关键参数与力学行为的计算模型研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2008.
[11] 王志文. 化工容器设计[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 1990.
[12] 宋天罡. 某型TBM刀盘结构设计及有限元分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2017.
[13] 潘伶伶. TBM刀盘系统的参数化建模与强度分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 河北工业大学, 2015
[14] 霍军周. 全断面隧道掘进机刀盘系统现代设计理论及方法[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2017: 233-235.
[15] 杜彦良, 徐明新, 等. 全断面岩石隧道掘进机: 监测诊断与维护保养[M]. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 2013: 24-25.