不同屈光度初发性近视患者配戴角膜塑形镜的疗效分析
Clinical Observation on Orthokeratology of Onset Myopia with Different Diopter
DOI: 10.12677/HJO.2020.92014, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 崔 帅, 曹 敏, 彭润华, 于 强*:东莞光明眼科医院,广东 东莞
关键词: 角膜塑形镜初发性近视眼轴屈光度Orthokeratology Onset Myopia Axial Length Diopter
摘要: 目的:观察夜戴型角膜塑形镜(OK镜)对不同屈光度数的初发性近视患者的临床控制效果。方法:前瞻性病例研究收集自2017年4月~2018年4月在东莞光明眼科医院就诊的初发性近视患者158例(均右眼,共158眼),平均年龄(10.09 ± 1.53)岁,配戴框架眼镜组68眼,配戴OK镜组90眼;其中OK镜组患者根据初次验光的等效球镜度(SE)分为4个亚组:A组(0~−1.00 D),B组(−1.25~−2.00 D),C组(−2.25~−3.00 D),D组(−3.25~−4.00 D)。比较戴镜1年前后框架镜组及OK镜组裸眼视力(LogMAR)、等效球镜度、眼轴变化的差异;比较OK镜组内不同屈光度数的初发性近视患者戴镜1年前后的等效球镜度与眼轴增长变化的差异。结果:框架镜组与OK镜组随访1年后的裸眼视力、等效球镜度及眼轴变化差异均有统计学意义(t = 4.22, t = −14.44, t = 5.74,p均<0.01);OK镜组分为4个亚组,SE分别为(−0.88 ± 0.13) D、(−1.56 ± 0.23) D、(−2.67 ± 0.29) D、(−3.66 ± 0.27) D。戴镜1年后,眼轴增长分别为(0.29 ± 0.07) mm、(0.20 ± 0.10) mm、(0.15 ± 0.06) mm、(0.17 ± 0.08) mm,差异有统计学意义(F = 87.83, p < 0.01);戴镜1年前后等效球镜度差值为(−1.08 ± 0.22) D、(−0.40 ± 0.20) D、(−0.32 ± 0.16) D、(−0.34 ± 0.13) D,差异有统计学意义(F = 12.13, p < 0.01)。结论:OK镜在近视防控的临床效果明显优于框架镜。不同屈光度的初发性近视患者配戴夜戴型角膜塑形镜的近视控制效果不一,初发近视屈光度越高,近视控制效果可能越好。
Abstract: Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of orthokeratology for onset myopia with different diop-ter. Methods: Prospective study. 158 patients (158 eyes) with onset myopia at Dongguan Guang-ming Ophthalmic Hospital were conducted from April 2017 to April 2018. Sixty-eight patients who wore spectacles were enrolled in the spectacles group and 90 patients who wore orthokeratology lenses were enrolled in ortho-K group. According to the equivalent spherical degree (SE), ortho-k group was divided into 4 groups, group A with 0~−1.00 D, group B with −1.25~−2.00 D, group C with −2.25~−3.00 D, group D with −3.25~−4.00 D. The changes in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), re-fraction, axial length before and 1 year after wearing were measured and analyzed. Results: There were significant differences in UCVA, refraction and axial length before and 1 year after wearing spectacles or OK lens between spectacles group and ortho-k group respectively (t = 4.22, t = −14.44, t = 5.74, p < 0.01). The mean spherical equivalence was (−0.88 ± 0.13) D, (−1.56 ± 0.23) D, (−2.67 ± 0.29) D, (−3.66 ± 0.27) D for the eyes in Ortho-K group which was divided into 4 groups. After one year, the axial length increase was (0.29 ± 0.07) mm, (0.20 ± 0.10) mm, (0.15 ± 0.06) mm, (0.17 ± 0.08) mm respectively in four groups, there was statistical difference (F = 87.83, p < 0.01). The mean spherical equivalence increase was (−1.08 ± 0.22) D, (−0.40 ± 0.20) D, (−0.32 ± 0.16) D, (−0.34 ± 0.13) D respectively; there was statistical difference (F = 12.13, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Compared with spectacles, orthokeratology can significantly control the progression of myopia, and it shows better effect for onset myopia with higher refraction.
文章引用:崔帅, 曹敏, 彭润华, 于强. 不同屈光度初发性近视患者配戴角膜塑形镜的疗效分析[J]. 眼科学, 2020, 9(2): 113-118. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJO.2020.92014

参考文献

[1] 郭曦, 杨丽娜, 谢培英, 等. 角膜塑形镜治疗青少年近视的远期效果[J]. 眼科, 2012, 21(6): 371-374.
[2] 夏飞, 吴良成. 儿童近视防控干预方法的研究进展[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2016, 16(7): 1298-1301.
[3] 李霞, 张茂菊, 宋秀胜, 等. 青少年近视长期佩戴角膜塑形镜的有效性和安全性[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2018, 18(5): 968-970.
[4] 谢培英, 王志昕, 迟蕙. 少年儿童近视的长期角膜塑形疗效和安全性观察[J]. 中国斜视与小儿眼科杂志, 2008(4): 3-10.
[5] Kang, P. and Swarbrick, H. (2011) Peripheral Refraction in Myopic Children Wearing Orthokeratology and Gas-Permeable Lenses. Optometry and Vision Science, 88, 476-482.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Ahmed, A. and Swarbrick, H.A. (2003) The Effects of Overnight Orthokeratology Lens Wear on Corneal Thickness. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 44, 2518-2521.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Reinstein, D.Z., Gobbe, M. and Archer, T.J. (2009) Ep-ithelial, Stromal, and Corneal Pachymetry Changes during Orthokeratology. Optometry & Vision Science, 86, E1006-E1014.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Smith, E.L., Kee, C.S., Ramamirtham, R., et al. (2005) Peripheral Vision Can Influence Eye Growth and Refractive Development in Infant Monkeys. Inves-tigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 46, 3965-3972.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Kee, C.-S., Ramamirtham, R., Qiao-Grider, Y., et al. (2004) The Role of Peripheral Vision in the Refractive-Error Development of Infant Monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visualence, 46, 76-81.
[10] Benavente-Perez, A., Nour, A. and Troilo, D. (2014) Axial Eye Growth and Refractive Error Development Can Be Modified by Exposing the Peripheral Retina to Relative Myopic or Hy-peropic Defocus. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 55, 6765-6773.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 魏士飞, 李仕明, 王宁利, 等. 配戴角膜塑形镜和框架眼镜对近视儿童周边屈光度影响的随机对照临床试验[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志 , 2017, 35(10): 930-935.
[12] Cho, P., Cheung, S.W. and Edwards, M. (2005) The Longitudinal Orthokeratology Research in Children (LORIC) in Hong Kong: A Pilot Study on Refractive Changes and Myopic Control. Current Eye Research, 30, 71-80.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 姚卫兰, 崔冬梅, 李周越, 等. 角膜塑形镜控制青少年低中高度近视发展的效果[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2017, 38(4): 532-537.
[14] He, M.M., Du, Y.R., Liu, Q.Y., et al. (2016) Effects of Orthokeratology on the Progression of Low to Moderate Myopia in Chinese Children. BMC Ophthalmology, 16, 126-131.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Mutti, D.O., Hayes John, R., Mitchell, G.L., et al. (2007) Refractive Error, Axial Length, and Relative Peripheral Refractive Error before and after the Onset of Myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 48, 2510-2516.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Mutti, D.O., Sholtz, R.I., Friedman, N.E., et al. (2000) Peripheral Refraction and Ocular Shape in Children. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 41, 1022-1030.
[17] Hu, Y., Wen, C., Li, Z., et al. (2019) Areal Summed Corneal Power Shift Is an Important Determinant for Axial Length Elongation in Myopic Children Treated with Overnight Orthokeratology. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 10, 1-5.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]