不对称社会困境中合作行为的研究述评
A Review of Cooperative Behaviors in the Asymmetric Social Dilemma
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2020.105076, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王玉洁：广东轻工职业技术学院，大学生心理健康教育与咨询中心，广东 广州
关键词: 合作行为；社会困境；不对称；社会阶层；奖惩设置；Cooperative Behaviors； Social Dilemma； Asymmetry； Social Class； Rewards and Punishment
摘要: 相比于传统经济学理论，从不对称模型出发理解社会困境中的合作机制更符合人类生活的现实背景。不对称社会困境是指处于不同资源状态下个体面临个人利益与集体利益相冲突的决策情境。无论是社会分层、社会比较和权力感所造成的社会关系不对称，还是初始资源配置、奖惩设置所造成的决策结构不对称，都可能导致不对称资源状态的出现。本研究对社会关系不对称与决策结构不对称影响合作行为的研究现状进行述评，鉴于目前关于不对称因素影响合作行为的研究尚未形成一致结论，建议未来研究应考虑社会价值取向、公平偏好、自我控制等个体因素来揭示不对称社会困境中合作行为的作用机制。
Abstract: Compared with the traditional economic theory, the asymmetric model is more suitable for the realistic background of human life to understanding cooperative behaviors in social dilemma. Asymmetric social dilemma refers to the decision-making situation in which individuals are con-fronted with the conflict between individual interests and collective interests under different re-source states. Whether the asymmetry of social relations caused by social class, social comparison and power, or the asymmetry of decision structure caused by initial resource allocation and re-ward-punishment setting, it may lead to the emergence of asymmetric resource state. We reviewed the state of research on the influence of social relation asymmetry and decision structure asymmetry on cooperative behavior, but no consistent conclusions have been reached. It’s sug-gested that future research should consider individual factors such as social value orientation, eq-uity preference and self-control to investigate the mechanism of cooperative behavior in asym-metric social dilemma.
文章引用：王玉洁 (2020). 不对称社会困境中合作行为的研究述评. 心理学进展, 10(5), 616-622. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.105076

参考文献

[1] 窦凯, 刘耀中, 王玉洁, 聂衍刚(2018). “乐”于合作: 感知社会善念诱导合作行为的情绪机制. 心理学报, 50(1), 101-114.
[2] 刘耀中, 江玉琳, 窦凯(2016). 权力对建议采纳的影响: 反馈效价的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(3), 400-404.
[3] 刘长江, 郝芳(2011). 不对称社会困境中社会价值取向对合作的影响. 心理学报, 43(4), 432-441.
[4] 刘长江, 郝芳(2015). 不对称社会困境中的决策: 行为的双重模式. 心理科学进展, 23(1), 1-10.
[5] 王瑞武, 贺军州, 王亚强, 石磊, 李耀堂(2010). 非对称性有利于合作行为的演化. 中国科学: 生命科学, 40(8), 758-764.
[6] 谢文澜, 汪祚军, 王霏, 张林(2013). 合作行为的产生机制及影响因素——基于进化心理学视角下的探讨. 心理科学进展, 21(10), 1-7.
[7] 郑晓莹, 彭泗清, 彭璐珞(2015). “达”则兼济天下? 社会比较对亲社会行为的影响及心理机制. 心理学报, 47(2), 243-250.
[8] Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2013). The Big Two in Social Judgment and Behavior. Social Psychology, 44, 61-62.[CrossRef] 
[9] Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2013). The Big Two in Social Judgment and Behavior. Social Psychology, 44, 61-62.[CrossRef] 
[10] Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The Experience of power: Examining the Effects of Power on Approach and Inhibition Tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Avrahami, J., Kareev, Y., Todd, P. M., & Silverman, B. (2014). Allocation of Resources in Asymmetric Competitions: How Do the Weak Maintain a Chance of Winning? Journal of Economic Psychology, 42, 161-174.[CrossRef] 
[12] Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. (2013). Trust, Conflict, and Cooper-ation: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1090-1112.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Balliet, D., Mulder, L. B., & Van Lange, P. A. (2011). Reward, Punishment, and Cooperation: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulle-tin, 137, 594-615.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social Dilemma. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.[CrossRef] 
[15] De Cremer, D., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2001). Why Prosocials Exhibit Greater Cooperation than Proselfs: The Roles of Social Responsibility and Reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 15, S5-S18.[CrossRef] 
[16] Declerck, C. H., Boone, C., & Emonds, G. (2013). When Do People Cooperate? The Neuroeconomics of Prosocial Decision Making. Brain Cogn, 81, 95-117.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Dorfman, A., Eyal, T., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2014). Proud to Coo-perate: The Consideration of Pride Promotes Cooperation in a Social Dilemma. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 105-109.[CrossRef] 
[18] Dou, K., Wang, Y. J., Li, J. B., Li, J. J., & Nie, Y. G. (2018). Perceiving High Social Mindfulness during Interpersonal Interaction Promotes Cooperative Behaviours. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 97-106.[CrossRef] 
[19] Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. (2006). The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
[20] Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Social Class, Power, and Selfishness: When and Why Upper and Lower Class Individuals Behave Unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 436-449.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Fennis, B. M. (2011). Can’t Get over Me: Ego Depletion Attenuates Prosocial Effects of Perspective Taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 580-585.[CrossRef] 
[22] Grelley, D., Lea, S., & Fischer, P. (2008). Ego Depletion and the Tragedy of the Commons: Self Regulation Fatigue in Public Goods Games. (Unpublished Manuscript)
[23] Kimbrough, E. O., Sheremeta, R. M., & Shields, T. W. (2014). When Parity Promotes Peace: Resolving Conflict between Asymmetric Agents. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 99, 96-108.[CrossRef] 
[24] Kopelman, S., Hardin, A. E., Myers, C. G., & Tost, L. P. (2016). Cooperation in Multicultural Negotiations: How the Cultures of People with Low and High power Interact. Journal of Ap-plied Psychology, 101, 721-730.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social Class, Solipsism, and Contextualism: How the Rich Are Different from the Poor. Psychological Review, 119, 546-572.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Martinsson, P., Myrseth, K. O. R., & Wollbrant, C. (2012). Reconciling Pro-Social vs. Selfish Behavior: On the Role of Self-Control. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 304-315.
[27] Martins-son, P., Villegas-Palacio, C., & Wollbrant, C. (2015). Cooperation and Social Classes: Evidence from Colombia. Social Choice and Welfare, 45, 829-848.[CrossRef] 
[28] Molleman, L., Kölle, F., Starmer, C., & Gächter, S. (2019). People Prefer Coordinated Punishment in Cooperative Interactions. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 1145-1153.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Parks, C. D., Joireman, J., & Van Lange, P. A. (2013). Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 119-165.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Raub, W., Buskens, V., & Corten, R. (2015). Social Di-lemmas and Cooperation. In N. Braun, & N. J. Saam (Eds.), Handbuch Modellbildung und Simulation in den Sozialwis-senschaften (pp. 597-626). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.[CrossRef] 
[31] Righetti, F., & Finkenauer, C. (2011). If You Are Able to Con-trol Yourself, I Will Trust You: The Role of Perceived Self-Control in Interpersonal Trust. Journal of Personality and So-cial Psychology, 100, 874-886.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Robertson, T. E., Delton, A. W., Klein, S. B., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2014). Keeping the Benefits of Group Cooperation: Domain-Specific Responses to Distinct Causes of Social Exclusion. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 472-480.[CrossRef] 
[33] Schmid, P. C., Kleiman, T., & Amodio, D. M. (2015). Power Effects on Cognitive Control: Turning Conflict into Action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 655-663.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Sheldon, O. J., & Fishbach, A. (2011). Resisting the Temptation to Compete: Self-Control Promotes Cooperation in Mixed-Motive Interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 403-410.[CrossRef] 
[35] Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2009). When Being Dis-advantaged Grows into Vengeance: The Effects of Asymmetry of Interest and Social Rejection in Social Dilemmas. Eu-ropean Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 526-539.[CrossRef] 
[36] van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (2000). Decision-Induced Focusing in Social Di-lemmas: Give-Some, Keep-Some, Take-Some, and Leave-Some Dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 92-104.[CrossRef] 
[37] van Dijk, E., Parks, C. D., & Van Lange, P. A. (2013). Social Di-lemmas: The Challenge of Human Cooperation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 123-124.[CrossRef] 
[38] Van Doesum, N. J., Tybur, J. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2017). Class Impressions: Higher Social Class Elicits Lower Prosociality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 11-20.[CrossRef] 
[39] Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The Pursuit of Joint Outcomes and Equality in Outcomes: An Integrative Model of Social Value Orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337-349.[CrossRef] 
[40] Van Lange, P. A., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D., & Van Dijk, E. (2013). The Psychology of Social Dilemmas: A Review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 125-141.[CrossRef] 
[41] van Prooijen, J.-W., Coffeng, J., & Vermeer, M. (2014). Power and Retributive Justice: How Trait Information Influences the Fairness of Punishment among Power Holders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 190-201.[CrossRef] 
[42] Weber, J. M., Kopelman, S., & Messick, D. M. (2004). A Conceptual Review of Decision Making in Social Dilemmas: Applying a Logic of Appropriateness. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 8, 281-307.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Weber, T. O., Weisel, O., & Gächter, S. (2018). Dispositional Free Riders Do Not Free Ride on Punishment. Nature Communications, 9, 2390.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Yamagishi, T., Mifune, N., Li, Y., Shinada, M., Hashimoto, H., Horita, Y., et al. (2013). Is Behavioral Pro-Sociality Game-Specific? Pro-Social Preference and Expectations of Pro-Sociality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 260-271.[CrossRef] 
[45] Zitek, E. M., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2012). The Fluency of Social Hie-rarchy: The Ease with Which Hierarchical Relationships Are Seen, Remembered, Learned, and Liked. Journal of Perso-nality and Social Psychology, 102, 98-115.[CrossRef] [PubMed]