论在上海自贸区推行航空临时仲裁——以横琴自由贸易试验区临时仲裁制度为借鉴
The Study on the Practice of Temporary Aviation Arbitration in Shanghai Free Trade Zone —Take the Ad Hoc Arbitration System of Hengqin Free Trade Zone for Reference
摘要:
在国际航空争议解决多使用临时仲裁的大环境下,中国《仲裁法》对于约定仲裁机构有强制性规定而使得中国临时仲裁无法得到国内法院的执行。这一矛盾的存在极大限制了中国航空仲裁的发展。2014年新设立的上海国际航空仲裁院也受困于此而举步维艰。而在最高法院印发的《关于为自贸试验区建设提供司法保障的意见》和第五届珠海仲裁委员会通过的《横琴自由贸易试验区临时仲裁规则》给予了上海国际航空仲裁院乃至于整个航空仲裁领域有益的启发。本文将以横琴自贸试验区在临时仲裁方面的实践经验为参考,在理论和实践两方面对于在上海自由贸易试验区航空领域引入临时仲裁制度进行探讨,以期能够探索出适合上海自由贸易试验区航空领域的临时仲裁制度。
Abstract:
In the general environment where ad hoc arbitration is often used in international aviation dispute settlement, due to the existence of special provisions in China's arbitration law, ad hoc arbitration in China cannot be implemented by domestic courts. This principal contradiction has greatly limited the development of aviation arbitration in China. In 2014, the newly established Shanghai International Aviation Arbitration Court was also trapped in this dilemma. During the same period of time, the opinions on providing judicial guarantee for the construction of free trade zones issued by the Supreme Court and the provisional arbitration rules of Hengqin Free Trade Zone adopted by Zhuhai arbitration commission provided useful inspiration to the Shanghai International Aviation Arbitration Court and even the whole aviation arbitration field.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张超汉, 丁同民. 我国建立自由贸易试验区临时仲裁制度的意义与路径[J]. 中州学刊, 2017(8): 62-65.
|
|
[2]
|
刘晓红, 周祺. 我国建立临时仲裁利弊分析和时机选择[J]. 南京社会科学, 2012(9): 95-102.
|
|
[3]
|
兰阳译. 临时仲裁与机构仲裁. 程德钧. 涉外仲裁与法律(第1辑) [M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社出版, 192-223.
|
|
[4]
|
翟宣任. 上海自贸区临时仲裁构建的合理性分析[J]. 黑龙江工业学院学报, 2018(1): 99-105.
|