空气污染是否逼迫了生态技术创新?——基于门槛效应检验
Does Air Pollution Force the Innovation of Ecological Technology?—Based on Threshold Effect Test
摘要: 技术创新被认为是解决环境污染与应对气候变化最重要的途径之一。本文根据2004~2016年中国272个地级市的面板数据,对空气污染是否促进了生态技术创新进行实证分析,并且分别将环境规制与经济发展水平作为门槛变量,探讨生态技术创新与空气污染之间的非线性关系。研究结果表明:1) 当期的空气污染对生态技术创新的作用为负,而滞后一期的空气污染对生态技术创新的“逼迫”效应十分显著;2) 在以环境规制为门槛变量的条件下,空气污染与生态技术创新呈现“折线型”关系:随着环境规制的强度的上升,当期空气污染对生态技术创新的抑制作用扩大,而滞后一期的空气污染对生态技术创新的“逼迫”作用减小;3) 在以经济发展水平为门槛变量的条件下,当期的空气污染与生态技术创新呈现“U型”关系,随着经济发展水平的增长,当期空气污染从显著地抑制生态技术创新到不显著,直至促进生态技术创新;而滞后一期的空气污染与生态技术创新呈现“折线型”关系,即滞后一期空气污染对生态技术创新的“逼迫”效应不断增强;因此,政府制定环境规制应当适度,并且需要促进环境规制实现多样化、市场化,减少企业的成本负担,从而使得环境污染的“逼迫”作用发挥的作用最大化,从而尽可能地激励生态技术创新。此外,政府制定环境规制政策还应当因地制宜,不应该实行“一刀切”,需要考虑与地方的实际经济发展现状相结合,推动我国生态文明建设迈上新台阶。
Abstract: Technological innovation is considered to be one of the most important ways to solve environmental pollution and cope with climate change. This paper based on the panel data of 272 prefecture level cities in China from 2004 to 2016 makes an empirical analysis on whether air pollution promotes the innovation of ecological technology, and takes environmental regulation and economic development level as threshold variables to explore the non-linear relationship between the innovation of ecological technology and air pollution. The results show that: 1) The current air pollution has a negative effect on the innovation of ecological technology, while the lagging air pollution has a significant “forcing” effect on the innovation of ecological technology; 2) under the condition of environmental regulation as the threshold variable, the relationship between air pollution and ecological technological innovation shows a “broken line”: with the increase of the intensity of environmental regulation, the inhibition effect of current air pollution on ecological technological innovation increases, while the “forced” effect of lagging one period air pollution on ecological technological innovation decreases; 3) Under the condition of taking the economic de-velopment level as the threshold variable, the current air pollution and ecological technology in-novation show a “U-shaped” relationship. With the growth of economy, the air pollution in the current period first restrains the technological innovation significantly, then has no significant ef-fect, and finally starts to promote the economic growth significantly; and the relationship between the air pollution and the innovation of ecological technology that lags behind the first stage is “broken line”, that is to say, the "forcing" effect of the air pollution that lags behind the first stage on the innovation of ecological technology is continuously enhanced; therefore, the government should formulate environmental regulations appropriately, and it is necessary to promote the di-versification and marketization of environmental regulations, and reduce the cost burden of en-terprises, so as to maximize the role of “coercion” of environmental pollution and encourage the innovation of ecological technology as much as possible. In addition, the government should make environmental regulation policies according to local conditions, not “one size fits all”, which needs to be considered in combination with the actual economic development of the local situation, so as to promote China’s ecological civilization construction to a new level.
文章引用:倪文立. 空气污染是否逼迫了生态技术创新?——基于门槛效应检验[J]. 可持续发展, 2020, 10(3): 368-380. https://doi.org/10.12677/SD.2020.103045

参考文献

[1] Porteer, M.E. and Van Der Linde, C. (1995) Toward a New Conception of the Environment Competitiveness Rela-tionship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Su, H.N. and Moaniba, I.M. (2017) Does Innovation Respond to Climate Change? Empirical Evidence from Patents and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 122, 49-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 邵帅, 李欣, 曹建华, 杨莉莉. 中国空气污染治理的经济政策选择——基于空间溢出效应的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(9): 73-88.
[4] Jaffe, A.B. and Robert, N.S. (1995) Dynamic Incentives of Environmental Regulations: The Effects of Alternative Policy Instruments on Technology Dif-fusion. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, s43-s63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Michael, P. (1991) America’s Green Strategy. Scientific American, 264, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Jaffe, A.B. and Palmer, J.K. (1997) Environmental Reg-ulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 610-619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Domazlicky, B.R. and Weber, W.L. (2004) Does Environmental Protection Lead to Slower Productivity Growth in the Chemical Industry. Environmental and Resource Economics, 28, 301-324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Conrad, K. and Wastl, D. (1995) The Impact of En-vironmental Regulation on Productivity in German Industries. Empirical Economics, 20, 615-633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Lanoie, P. and Patry, M. (2001) Environmental Regulation and Produc-tivity: New Findings on the Porter Hypothesis. Working Paper.
[10] 赵红. 环境规制对中国企业技术创新影响的实证分析[J]. 管理现代化, 2008(3): 4-6.
[11] 沈能, 刘凤朝. 高强度的环境规制真能促进技术创新吗?——基于“波特假说”的再检验[J]. 中国软科学, 2012(4): 49-59.
[12] 张成, 陆旸, 郭路, 等. 环境规制强度和生产技术进步[J]. 经济研究, 2011(2): 113-123.
[13] 李斌, 彭星, 欧阳铭珂. 环境规制绿色全要素生产率与中国工业发展方式转变: 基于36个工业行业数据的实证分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013(4): 56-68.
[14] 李玲, 陶峰. 中国制造业最优环境规制强度的选择: 基于绿色全要素生产率的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2012(5): 70-82.
[15] 蒋伏心, 王竹君, 白俊红. 环境规制对技术创新影响的双重效应: 基于江苏省制造业动态面板数据的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013(7): 44-55.
[16] 王杰, 刘斌. 环境规制与企业全要素生产率——基于中国工业企业数据的检验分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014(3): 44-56.
[17] 黄德春, 刘志彪. 环境规制与企业自主创新——基于波特假说的企业竞争优势构建[J]. 中国工业经济, 2006(5): 100-106.
[18] 王兵, 吴延瑞, 颜鹏飞. 环境管制与全要素生产率增长: APEC的实证研究[J]. 经济研究, 2008(5): 19-32.
[19] 解垩. 环境规制与中国工业生产率增长[J]. 产业经济研究, 2008(1): 19-25.
[20] De Marchi, V. (2012) Environmental Innovation and R&D Cooperation: Empirical Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms. Research Policy, 41, 614-623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] De Marchi, V. and Grandinetti, R. (2013) Knowledge Strategies for Environmental Innovations: The Case of Italian Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17, 569-582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 王为东, 卢娜, 张财经. 空间溢出效应视角下低碳技术创新对气候变化的响应[J]. 中国人口•资源与环境, 2018, 28(8): 22-30.
[23] 严雅雪. 碳排放与空气污染的协同关系分析[J]. 环境经济研究, 2017, 2(2): 52-63.
[24] Hansen, B.E. (1999) Threshold Effects in Non-Dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93, 345-368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Van Donkelaar, A.R., Martin, V., Brauer, M. and Boys, B.L. (2015) Use of Satellite Observations for Longterm Exposure Assessment of Global Concentrations of Fine Particulate Matter. Environmental Health Perspectives, 123, 135-143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] 张学功, 柴敏. 环境规制作用下污染就近转移的机制分析——来自地级市层面实证研究[J]. 生态经济, 2018, 34(11): 188-193.
[27] 赵庆. 产业结构优化升级能否促进技术创新效率?[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(2): 239-248.
[28] 肖文, 林高榜. 政府支持、研发管理与技术创新效率——基于中国工业行业的实证分析[J]. 管理世界, 2014(4): 71-80.
[29] Yan, Z., Yi, L., Du, K., et al. (2017) Impacts of Low-Carbon Innovation and Its Heterogeneous Compo-nents on CO2 Emissions. Sustainability, 9, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Stewart, R.B. (1993) En-vironmental Regulation and International Competitiveness. Yale Law Journal, 102, 2039-2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef