终结诉讼不能作为缺乏上诉利益的处理方式

Terminating the Lawsuit Cannot Be Treated as a Way of Dealing with the Lack of Appeal Interests

摘要: 类推适用以存在法律漏洞为前提，以类似性作为具体判断标准。(2018)最高法民辖终372号民事裁定书中将缺乏上诉利益的情形类推适用终结诉讼的规定，不仅错误理解了法律漏洞的存在，对类似性的判断也存在明显漏洞，此二者反映了民事审判中法官运用类推适用方法所存在的普遍不足之处。由于诉讼程序规则有不同于实体法规定的特性，对于该领域的类推适用应有所限制。

Abstract: The application of analogy is premised on the existence of legal loopholes, and similarity is used as the specific judgment criterion. No. 372 Final Civil Ruling, (2002), by the Supreme People’s Court applies the provisions of terminating the lawsuit by analogy to the situation in which the appeal interest is lacking. Not only has it misunderstood the existence of legal loopholes, it also has obvious loopholes in its judgment of similarity. The common shortcomings of the judges’ application of analogy in civil trials are pointed out. Since the rules of procedure are different from those pre-scribed by substantive law, there should be restrictions on the application of analogies in this field.