硫酸铜不同施用时间和不同施用量对烤烟漂浮育苗的影响
Effects of Different Application Time and Dosage of Cupric Sulfate on Floating Seedling of Flue-Cured Tobacco
DOI: 10.12677/HJAS.2020.106057, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 舒勤静, 陈乾锦, 池国胜, 吴华建, 孙武仁, 叶礼霆, 张美明:南平市烟草公司光泽分公司,福建 光泽
关键词: 硫酸铜烤烟育苗Cupric Sulfate Flue-Cured Tobacco Seedling
摘要: 研究了烤烟漂浮育苗过程中,硫酸铜不同施用时间、不同施用量对烟苗生长发育的影响。结果表明,苗池施用硫酸铜对烟苗整齐度不产生影响,在一定范围内随着硫酸铜浓度的增加对烟苗的生长有促进作用,播种前施用17.28 ppm的硫酸铜可促进烟苗生长发育,而且硫酸铜施用时间越早对烟苗的生长越有促进作用,随着硫酸铜施用时间的推迟成苗期烟苗鲜重和干重明显减轻。
Abstract: The effects of different application time and dosage of cupric sulfate on floating seedling of flue-cured tobacco were studied. The results showed that there was no effect of cupric sulfate on uniformity of tobacco seedling in seedling pond. It could promote the growth of tobacco seedlings with the increase of cupric sulfate concentration in a certain range. It could promote the growth and development of tobacco seedling by using 17.28 ppm copper sulfate before sowing. The earlier the application time of cupric sulfate, the better the growth and development of tobacco seedling. The fresh weight and dry weight of tobacco seedling decreased significantly with the delay of cupric sulfate application.
文章引用:舒勤静, 陈乾锦, 池国胜, 吴华建, 孙武仁, 叶礼霆, 张美明. 硫酸铜不同施用时间和不同施用量对烤烟漂浮育苗的影响[J]. 农业科学, 2020, 10(6): 386-390. https://doi.org/10.12677/HJAS.2020.106057

参考文献

[1] PEARCE, B. and Maksymowicz, B. (1998) Careful Management Need with Float Plants-Avoid Common Mistakes. Burley Tobacco Production Guide.
[2] 刘国顺. 烟草栽培学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.
[3] 赵小丽, 宋立荣, 张小明. 硫酸铜控藻对浮游植物群落的影响[J]. 水生生物学报, 2009, 33(4): 596-602.
[4] 白永富, 卢秀萍, 李永平, 等. 烤烟漂浮育苗中硫酸铜对烟苗生长发育的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2006, 21(1): 66-68, 110.
[5] 黄光荣, 刘扬舟, 龙志亮, 等. 硫酸铜不同施用方法对烤烟漂浮育苗的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2009(3): 85-87.
[6] 韩锦峰, 林学梧, 郑宪滨. 喷施微量元素对烟草幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 1988(5): 37-40.
[7] 潘瑞炽, 董愚得. 植物生理学[M]. 第3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1955: 55.
[8] 王松华, 杨志敏, 徐朗莱. 植物铜素毒害及其抗性机制研究进展[J]. 生态环境, 2003, 12(3): 336-341.
[9] 邵玺文, 韩梅, 韩忠明, 等. 不同生境条件下黄芩光合日变化与环境因子的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3): 1470-1477.
[10] 孙浩, 张艳英, 宋金敏, 等. CU2+胁迫对烟草幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2008, 36(5): 34-36.