口语反讽认知要素——语境和音韵
Keys of Verbal Sarcasm Perception—Context and Prosody
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2020.106096, PDF,   
作者: 王 展：兰州大学外国语学院，甘肃 兰州
关键词: 反讽；语境；音韵；Sarcasm； Context； Prosody
摘要: 反讽以表面赞美的话语来表达消极的情绪或态度。书面反讽的认知处理依赖于语境线索；而在理解口语反讽的过程中，语境和音韵线索均发挥作用。但是，对于语境和音韵作用的大小问题，国内外众多研究结论间还存在分歧。我们发现：不同实证研究结果间产生分歧的主要原因在于各实验未控制语境信息复杂度这一干扰变量。未来有关口语反讽认知的研究设计应注意此类问题，以保证实验的效度和信度。
Abstract: Sarcastic expressions convey negative emotions or attitudes with complimentary remarks. In the process of interpreting sarcasm in written form, the contextual information is indispensable, and in the process of interpreting verbal sarcasm, context and prosody will work together. However, there are still lots of controversies about which cue plays bigger role in the perception process. We find that the main reason for the divergence among different studies is that they did not control the complexity of the contextual information. Future studies about verbal sarcasm perception should pay more attention to the irrelevant variable, so that the validity and reliability of the experiment can be improved.
文章引用：王展 (2020). 口语反讽认知要素——语境和音韵. 心理学进展, 10(6), 789-794. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.106096

参考文献

[1] 黄彬瑶(2015). 语境制约汉语反语认知加工的神经心理机制研究. 博士论文, 杭州: 浙江大学.
[2] 章婷, 顾文涛(2011). 汉语情感语音的语料设计与韵律研究. 南京师范大学文学院学报, 3, 33-44.
[3] Anolli, L., Ciceri, R., & Infantino, M. G. (2000). Irony as a Game of Implicitness: Acoustic Profiles of Ironic Communication. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 275-311.
[CrossRef] 
[4] Colston, H. L., & O’Brien, J. (2000). Contrast and Pragmatics in Figurative Language: Anything Understatement Can Do, Irony Can Do Better. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1557-1583.
[CrossRef] 
[5] Deliens, G., Antoniou, K., Clin, E., & Kissine, M. (2017). Perspective-Taking and Frugal Strategies: Evidence from Sarcasm Detection. Journal of Pragmatics, 119, 33-45.
[CrossRef] 
[6] Gibbs, R. W. (1986). On the Psycholinguistics of Sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 3-15.
[CrossRef] 
[7] Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[8] Giora, R. (1997). Understanding Figurative and Literal Language: The Graded Salience Hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 183-206.
[CrossRef] 
[9] Giora, R. (1999). On the Priority of Salient Meanings: Studies of Literal and Figurative Language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 919-929.
[CrossRef] 
[10] Giora, R. (2003). On Our Mind: Salience, Context and Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
[CrossRef] 
[11] Grice, P. H. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
[CrossRef] 
[12] Jeffrey, H. T., Philip, D. J., & Kelly, P. (2000). Children’s Comprehension of Critical and Complimentary Forms of Verbal Irony. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 227-248.
[CrossRef] 
[13] Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to Be Sarcastic: The Echoic Reminder Theory of Verbal Irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 374-386.
[CrossRef] 
[14] Kumon-Nakanura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about Another Piece of Pie: The Allusional Pretense Theory of Discourse Irony? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 3-21.
[CrossRef] 
[15] Mehrabian, A., & Ferris, S. R. (1967). Inference of Attitudes from Nonverbal Communication in Two Channels. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 248-252.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Pell, M. D., Paulmann, S., Dara, C., Alasseri, A., & Kotz, S. A. (2009). Factors in the Recognition of Vocally Expressed Emotions: A Comparison of Four Languages. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 417-435.
[CrossRef] 
[17] Rivière, E., Klein, M., & Champagne-Lavau, M. (2018). Using Context and Prosody in Irony Understanding: Variability amongst Individuals. Journal of Pragmatics, 138, 165-172.
[CrossRef] 
[18] Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[19] Shapley, M. (1987). Prosodic Variation and Audience Response. Papers in Pragmatics, 1, 66-79.
[CrossRef] 
[20] Voyer, D., Thibodeau, S. H., & Delong, B. J. (2014). Context, Contrast, and Tone of Voice in Auditory Sarcasm Perception. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45, 29-53.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[CrossRef] 
[22] Woodland, J., & Voyer, D. (2011). Context and Intonation in the Perception of Sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 227-239.
[CrossRef]