视频分享网站间接侵权问题研究

Research on Indirect Infringement of Video Sharing Website

摘要: 随着我国网络技术的发展，视频分享网站成为网络服务中的重要部分。在法律体系中，有关网络服务提供者侵权的问题由于其构成较为复杂往往引起较大的争议，对于网络服务提供者作为存储空间间接侵权这一问题，关于责任的分担和过错的认定作为其中重要部分，在责任分担的部分，主要有日本卡拉ok法理所确立的网络服务提供者承担直接侵权责任和美国判例中的替代责任，按照我国实际情况要求网络服务提供者承担替代责任较为合理。再而关于过错的认定，“应知”论已经成为我国立法主流，司法实务中也将“应知”作为裁判依据，但依然有不少学者以视频分享网站不负审查义务为由反对将“应知”论，“应知”论应当不限于以往侵权行为的认定而拓展其内核，并在立法上加以完善。

Abstract: With the development of network technology in China, video sharing website has become an im-portant part of network services. In the legal system, the infringement of network service provider often causes great controversy because of its complex composition. As for the indirect infringement of storage space by network service provider, the responsibility sharing and fault identification are important parts. In the part of responsibility sharing, there are mainly network service providers established by karaoke law in Japan. It is reasonable to assume the direct tort liability and the alternative liability in the American case, and require the network service provider to bear the alternative liability according to the actual situation of our country. Furthermore, the theory of “should know” has become the mainstream of legislation in our country, and “should know” is also used as the basis of judgment in judicial practice. However, there are still many scholars who object to the theory of “should know” and “should know” on the grounds that the video sharing website does not bear the obligation of review, which should not be limited to the identification of previous tort, but expand its core, and improve it in legislation.