信贷资产证券化对银行风险承担的影响分析
Analysis on the Impact of Securitization of Credit Assets on Bank Risk Taking
DOI: 10.12677/BGlo.2020.83007, PDF,   
作者: 陈奕帆, 金 辉:杭州电子科技大学经济学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 信贷资产证券化商业银行风险承担系统GMMCredit Assets Securitization Commercial Banks Risk Taking System GMM
摘要: 本文选取2011~2018年51家商业银行年度面板数据,通过固定效应模型和系统GMM动态面板回归模型实证分析信贷资产证券化对银行风险承担的影响效应,发现信贷资产证券化对银行不良贷款率具有显著的正向促进作用。研究结果表明,信贷资产证券化并没有实现信贷风险真正地剥离或转移,原因在于发行银行通过提高自身杠杆率水平、持有更多高风险的不良资产以及扩大信贷规模等方式,导致不良贷款率反而升高。因此,监管部门有必要加强对银行信贷资产证券化的监督管理,以防银行对其过度使用。
Abstract: Based on the annual panel data of 51 commercial banks from 2011 to 2018, this paper finds out that securitization of credit assets had a significant positive effect on banks’ non-performing loan ratio through fixed-effect model and systematic GMM dynamic panel regression model to analyze the influence of securitization of credit assets on banks’ risk taking. The results show that the se-curitization of credit assets did not fully realize the goal of stripping or transferring credit risk because the increase of the leverage ratio and the high-risk non-performing assets and the expan-sion of the credit scale result in the level-up of the non-performing loan ratio instead of declining. Therefore, it is necessary for the regulatory authorities to strengthen the supervision and man-agement of the securitization of bank credit assets so as to prevent banks from overusing it.
文章引用:陈奕帆, 金辉. 信贷资产证券化对银行风险承担的影响分析[J]. 商业全球化, 2020, 8(3): 52-62. https://doi.org/10.12677/BGlo.2020.83007

参考文献

[1] Purnanandam, A.K. (2011) Originate-to-Distribute Model and the Sub-Prime Mortgage Crisis. The Review of Financial Studies, 24, 1881-1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Elul, R. (2016) Securitization and Mortgage Default. Journal of Financial Services Research, 49, 281-309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Dell’Ariccia, G., Igan, D. and Laeven, L. (2012) Credit Booms and Lending Standards: Evidence from the Subprime Mortgage Market. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44, 367-384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Carbo-Valverde, S., Degryse, H. and Rodriguez-Fernandez, F. (2015) The Impact of Securitization on Credit Rationing: Empirical Evidence. Journal of Financial Stability, 10, 36-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Mendonca, H.F.D. and Barcelos, V.Í. (2015) Securitization and Credit Risk: Empirical Evidence from an Emerging Economy. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 32, 12-28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Le, H.T.T., Narayanan, R.P. and Van Vo, L. (2016) Has the Effect of Asset Securitization on Bank Risk Taking Behavior Changed? Journal of Financial Services Research, 49, 39-64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 许坤, 殷孟波. 信用风险转移创新是否改变了银行风险承担行为? [J]. 国际金融研究, 2014(7): 54-61.
[8] 张敬思, 曹国华. 资本约束、银行风险承担与经济资本——基于中国53家商业银行的经验研究[J]. 国际金融研究, 2016, (12): 64-73.
[9] 王军生, 邹东哲. 信贷资产证券化对银行业稳定性经营的影响[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2016(7): 57-61.
[10] 郭甦, 梁斯. 资产证券化是否改变了商业银行的风险承担?——一个来自中国的证据[J]. 国际金融研究, 2017(9): 67-75.
[11] 潘慧峰, 刘曦彤. 商业银行信贷资产证券化对信用风险影响的实证分析[J]. 科学决策, 2017(6): 29-40.
[12] 宋清华, 胡世超. 资产证券化、信用风险与系统性风险——基于中国上市银行的实证研究[J]. 广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 40(3): 27-39.
[13] 李佳. 资产证券化能否缓解银行信用风险承担?——来自中国银行业的经验证据[J]. 国际金融研究, 2019(6): 57-66.
[14] 张春海. 信贷资产证券化缓解银行风险承担水平了吗?——来自中国银行业的经验证据[J]. 区域金融研究, 2020(1): 38-43.