定边采油厂降压增注新型酸液及添加剂性能评价
Performance Evaluation of New Acid Solution and Additive Added by Pressure-Relief Injection in Dingbian Oil Recovery Plant
DOI: 10.12677/ME.2020.83051, PDF,   
作者: 刘 栋, 由 洋:陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司研究院,陕西 西安
关键词: 降压增注深度酸化缓蚀剂铁离子稳定剂表面活性剂Buck Increase Deep Acidification Corrosive Agents Iron Ion Stabilizer Surfactant
摘要: 针对定边采油厂某注水项目区域内主采层位为三叠系长8层酸化常规土酸酸化反应速度很快、作业距离短、二次、三次伤害严重、过度溶蚀、腐蚀严重等问题,开发了一种包含盐酸、氢氟酸、有机酸、氟硼酸以及多种添加剂,具有低腐蚀、低伤害、低反应速度、配伍性良好性能的新型酸液,并对新型酸液及添加剂性能进行了评价,结果显示:相比常规土酸,新型酸液缓速效果明显,适合深度酸化;同等添加量时,H03型缓蚀剂的缓蚀效果明显优于与H01、H02型缓蚀剂,且相同缓蚀效果条件下,H03型缓蚀剂的用量最少;螯合剂添加量1500 ppm时,稳铁能力达到最大值;表面活性剂HW-3用量500~2000 ppm,新型酸液与原油表面张力维持在18 mN/m左右,为维持一定的安全余量,3%新型酸液中添加1000 ppm的HW-3型表面活性剂。
Abstract: In the area of a water injection project in Dingbian oil extraction plant, the main mining layer is acidified conventional soil acid acidizing reaction with fast speed, short operating distance, second time, third time damage, excessive erosion, and serious corrosion. A new acid solution containing hydrochloric acid, hydrofluoric acid, organic acid, fluoroboric acid and a variety of additives with low corrosion, low damage, low reaction speed and good compatibility has been developed, and the performance of new acids and additives has been evaluated. The results showed that the new acid was more effective than conventional soil acid, and was suitable for deep acidification. When the same amount was added, the corrosion inhibition effect of H03 corrosion inhibitor was better than that of H01 and H02 corrosion inhibitor. Under the same corrosion inhibition effect, the use of H03 corrosion inhibitor was the least; When the chelating agent is added to 1500 ppm, the iron stabilization capacity reaches a maximum; the surfactant HW-3 uses 500 - 2000 ppm. The surface tension between the new acid and crude oil is maintained at about 18 mN/m. In order to maintain a certain safety margin, 1000 ppm of HW-3 surfactant is added to the new acid solution of 3%.
文章引用:刘栋, 由洋. 定边采油厂降压增注新型酸液及添加剂性能评价[J]. 矿山工程, 2020, 8(3): 405-414. https://doi.org/10.12677/ME.2020.83051

参考文献

[1] 朱红旺. 鄯善油田裂缝性油藏注水井解堵增注关键技术研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2013.
[2] 付刚. 东胜油区特低渗油藏增注工艺机理研究与效果评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2017.
[3] 陈薇羽. S油田注水井砂岩储层酸化技术研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2018.
[4] 王尔珍, 王勇, 宋昭杰, 邓志颖, 王伟波. 长庆姬塬油田长效在线增注技术现场应用[J]. 油田化学, 2019, 36(2): 262-266.
[5] 张小东, 吴磊磊, 张瑶瑶. 低渗油藏氧化酸及螯合酸增注技术研究[J]. 科技经济导刊, 2019, 27(13): 80.
[6] 杨乾隆, 李立标, 陶思羽, 陆小兵, 朱继云. 注水井不动管柱螯合酸脉冲式注入酸化增注技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2018, 46(5): 90-94.
[7] 孙鹏飞. 高温深层注水井在线酸化技术研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2018.
[8] 盛浩. 辽河油田降压增注工艺技术研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2018.
[9] 周逸凝, 周迅, 武迪生, 白甲家, 田育红. 缩膨降压增注技术改善低渗油藏注水研究[J]. 当代化工, 2017, 46(10): 2149-2152.
[10] 何延龙, 蒲春生, 董巧玲, 景成, 谷潇雨, 韩春春, 纪超, 刘洪志, 李晓. 水力脉冲波协同多氢酸酸化解堵反应动力学模型[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(4): 499-507.
[11] 帅群, 陆小兵, 樊勇杰, 杨欢. 镇北油田长8油层有机膦酸酸液增注体系研制及应用[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(17): 162-166.
[12] 陈金峰, 薛锦善, 李立文, 李志刚, 任操, 毛冉, 高洪涛. 多氢酸酸化技术在复杂断块砂岩油藏中的研究与应用[J]. 油气井测试, 2016, 25(5): 47-48+51+77.
[13] 雷金华, 曾云, 梅光远, 吴豹. 低渗透油藏注表面活性剂协同酸化解堵降压增注研究[J]. 工程研究-跨学科视野中的工程, 2016, 8(6): 593-597.
[14] 中华人民共和国石油天然气行业标准SY/T5368-2000《岩石薄片鉴定》[S].