窟野河流域河川基流变化及其驱动因素分析
Analysis on the Change of Base Flow and Its Driving Factors in Kuye River Basin
DOI: 10.12677/JWRR.2020.94039, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 申恋绵, 蒋晓辉*, 雷宇昕:西北大学陕西省地表过程与环境承载力重点实验室,陕西 西安;西北大学城市与环境学院,陕西 西安
关键词: 基流分割突变贡献率比较研究Base Flow Segmentation Mutation Contribution Comparative Study
摘要: 基于窟野河流域温家川水文站1956~2012年的日径流资料以及气候等数据,通过比较递归数字滤波法(RF法)、数字滤波法、平滑最小值法与HYSEP法四类共九种方法分割的基流过程、基流指数统计特征与分割效果误差,确定出适合的分割方法;采用差积曲线法与滑动t检验法确定并检验基流突变年份;采用双累积曲线法分别计算气候因素与人类活动的贡献率。结果表明:选用F1法进行基流分割更为可靠。基流不仅呈现出持续减少的趋势,且突变年份1980年和1996年与气候突变点不一致,以突变年为界将时间序列分为三个阶段。与基准期相比,第二、三阶段气候和人类活动的贡献率分别为7.72%、92.28%和15.73%、84.27%。进入21世纪,人类活动始终是影响基流的主要因素,气候变化对基流的影响呈现出日益增长的趋势。
Abstract: Based on the daily runoff data and climate data of Wenjiachuan hydrology station in Kuye River basin from 1956 to 2012, the appropriate segmentation method was determined by comparing the numerical statistical characteristics and the base flow index errors of nine methods, which includes recursive digital filtering, smooth minimum and HYSEP methods. The difference product curve and slip t test were used to determine and verify the mutation year of base flow. The contribution rates of climate factors and human activities were calculated by double cumulative curve method. The results show that F1 method is reliable for analysis, and the base flow not only shows a trend of continuous reduction, but also the abrupt transition years of 1980 and 1996 were inconsistent with the abrupt transition points of climate. The time series was divided into three stages with the abrupt transition years as the boundary. Compared with the base period, the contribution rates of climate and human activities in the second and third stages are 7.72%, 92.28%, 15.73% and 84.27%, respectively. In the 21st century, human activities have always been the main factor affecting the base-flow, and the influence of climate change on base-flow shows an increasing trend.
文章引用:申恋绵, 蒋晓辉, 雷宇昕. 窟野河流域河川基流变化及其驱动因素分析[J]. 水资源研究, 2020, 9(4): 373-385. https://doi.org/10.12677/JWRR.2020.94039

参考文献

[1] 戴明英. 黄河中游支流基流的分割及特性分析[J]. 人民黄河, 1996, 18(10): 40-43. DAI Mingying. Base flow separation and characteristic analyses of tributaries in the middle reach of Yellow River. Yellow River, 1996, 18(10): 40-43. (in Chinese)
[2] TALLAKSEN, L. M. A review of baseflow recession analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 1995, 165(1-4): 349-370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 蓝永超, 康尔泗. 河西内陆干旱区主要河流出山径流特征及变化趋势分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2000, 22(2): 147-152. LAN Yongchao, KANG Ersi. Changing trend and features of the runoff from mountain areas of some main rivers in the Hexi in-land region. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2000, 22(2): 147-152. (in Chinese)
[4] WILBY, R., GREENFIELD, B. and GLENNY, C. A coupled synoptic-hydrological model for climate change impact assessment. Journal of Hydrology, 1994, 153(1-4): 265-290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] VOROSMARTY, C. J., GREEN, P., SALISBURY, J., et al. Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science, 2000, 289(5477): 284-288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 董薇薇, 丁永建, 魏霞. 祁连山疏勒河上游基流变化及其影响因素分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 2014, 36(3): 662-663. DONG Weiwei, DING Yongjian and WEI Xia. Variation of the base flow and its causes in the upper reaches of the Shule river in the Qilian Mountains. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2014, 36(3): 661-669. (in Chinese)
[7] 杨倩楠. 黄河中游不同地貌区基流变化及对生态建设的响应[D]. 西安: 陕西省西安理工大学, 2019. YANG Qiannan. Baseflow change of different geomorphologic regions in the middle yellow river and its responses to ecological construction. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Technology, 2019. (in Chinese)
[8] 雷泳南. 窟野河流域河川基流演变特征及其驱动因素分析[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心), 2012. LEI Yongnan. Analysis on trend and driving factors of base flow in Kuye catchment. Beijing: Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Ministry of Education, Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment Research), 2012. (in Chinese)
[9] ECKHARDT, K. How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation. Hydrological Processes, 2005, 19(2): 507-515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] LYNE, V. D., HOLLICK, M. Stochastic time-variable rain-fall-runoff modeling. In: Hydrology and water resources symposium. Perth: Australian National Conference Publication, 1979: 89-93.
[11] NATHAN, R. J., MCMAHON, T. A. Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses. Water Resources Research, 1990, 26(7): 1465-1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] CHAPMAN, T. G., MAXWELL, I. A. Baseflow separation-comparison of numerical methods with tracer experiments. Institute Engineer Australia National Conference, Institution of Engineers, Camberra, Australia, 1996: 539-545.
[13] BOUGHTON, W. C. A simple model for estimating the water yield of ungauged catchments. In: Institute engineer Australia national conference. Canberra: Institution of Engineer, 1993: 317-324.
[14] ECKHARDT, K. How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation. Hydrological Processes, 2005, 19(2): 507-515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] NATHAN, R. J., MCMAHON, T. A. Evaluation of baseflow and recession analyses. Water Resources Research, 1990, 26(7): 1465-1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] ARNOLD, J. G., ALLEN, P. M., MUTTIAH, R., et al. Automated base flow separation and recession analysis techniques. Groundwater, 1995, 33(6): 1010-1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] CHAPMAN, T. G. Comment on “evaluation of automated tech-niques for baseflow and recession analysis” by R. J. Nathan and T. A. McMahon. Water Resources Research, 1991, 27(7): 1783-1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] CHAPMAN, T. A comparison of algorithms for stream flow reces-sion and baseflow separation. Hydrological Processes, 1999, 13: 701-714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Hydrology of Institute. Low flow studies. Wallingford: Institute of Hydrology, 1980.
[20] AKSOY, H., KURT, L. and ERIS, E. Filtered smoothed minima baseflow separation method. Journal of Hydrology, 2009, 372(1-4): 94-101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] WAHL, K., WAHL, T. Determining the flow of comal springs at New Braunfels, Texas. Texas Water, 1995, 95(6): 16-17.
[22] 左海凤, 武淑林, 邵景力, 等. 山丘区河川基流BFI程序分割方法的运用与分析——以汾河流域河岔水文站为例[J]. 水文, 2007, 27(1): 69-71. ZUO Haifeng, WU Shulin, SHAO Jingli, et al. Application of computerized base-flow separation method with BFI program in mountainous areas. Hydrology, 2007, 27(1): 69-71. (in Chinese)
[23] NASH, J. E., SUTCLIFFE, J. V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models’ part I—A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 1970, 10(3): 282-290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 朱芮芮, 刘昌明, 郑红星. 无定河流域地下水更新时间估算[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(3): 315-322. ZHU Ruirui, LIU Changming and ZHENG Hongxing. Estimating residence time of groundwater in the Wudinghe River Basin. Acta Geographical Sinica, 2009, 64(3): 315-322. (in Chinese)
[25] 王燕, 赵雪花, 张永波, 等. 不同基流分割方法在渭河流域的应用对比分析[J]. 水力发电, 2017(2): 15-17, 80. WANG Yan, ZHAO Xuehua, ZHANG Yongbo, et al. Comparison of different base flow separation methods applied in Weihe River Basin. Water Power, 2017, 43(2): 15-17, 80. (in Chinese)
[26] MEI, Y. W., ANAGNOSTOU, E. N. A hydrograph sepa-ration method based on information from rainfall and runoff records. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 523: 636-649.[CrossRef
[27] 黄珂珂, 董晓华, 陈亮, 等. 黄柏河流域近40年极端降水变化特性分析[J]. 三峡大学学报, 2019, 41(5): 19-24. HUANG Keke, DONG Xiaohua, CHEN Liang, et al. Analysis of extreme precipitation characteristics in Huangbai River basin in recent 40 years. Journal of China Three Gorges University, 2019, 41(5): 19-24. (in Chinese)