从阿列克西原则理论角度看第三人震惊损害问题

An Analysis of the Third Nervous Shock from the Perspective of Robert Alexy Principle Theory

摘要: 如何合理平衡惊吓损害事件中加害行为人与第三人之间的利益冲突，是各国侵权法理论与实践的重点与难点。在第三人震惊案件的适用法律过程中，侵权责任法中的过错责任原则与公平责任原则发生了碰撞，阿列克西的原则理论便成为重要选择。本文以法理学的角度解构第三人震惊案件中蕴含的原则冲突问题，并在此基础上进行关于该问题的价值权衡，同时研究学界对阿列克西理论的反对意见，批判性地吸收阿列克西原则理论，以探求我国第三人震惊损害赔偿案件的解决路径。

Abstract: How to balance the conflict of interest between the victimizer and the third person is the key and difficult point in the theory and practice of tort law in various countries. In the process of applying the law to the case of Nervous Shock, the principle of fault liability and the principle of fair liability in tort liability law collide, and Alexey’s principle theory becomes an important choice. Based on the perspective of jurisprudence, the collisions of principles contained in the third nervous shocking case are deconstructed, and on this basis, the value about the legal interest is weighed. At the same time, the research community opposition to Alexy theory is studied, and the Alexy principle theory is critically absorbed, to explore the solution of the third shock damage compensation cases in China.