雅布赖盆地新河组块状砂岩沉积–成岩–物性耦合机制
Coupling Mechanism of Sedimentation-Diagenesis-Physical Property from Xinhe Formation Massive Sandstones in Yabrai Basin
DOI: 10.12677/JOGT.2020.422019, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 周晓峰:中国石油大学(北京),石油工程学院,北京;中国石油大学(北京),石油工程教育部重点实验室,北京;油气资源与工程国家重点实验室,北京;唐海忠, 魏 军, 肖文华, 张蕊胜, 李 景, 赵 隽:中国石油玉门油田分公司勘探开发研究院,甘肃 酒泉
关键词: 块状砂岩物性特征沉积作用成岩作用新河组雅布赖盆地Massive Sandstones Physical Property Sedimentation Diagenesis Xinhe Formation Yabrai Basin
摘要: 雅布赖盆地新河组块状砂岩的孔隙度与渗透率交会图呈现出特殊的“两竖夹一横”特征,通过岩心观察、物性、铸体薄片、扫描电镜等开展沉积–成岩–物性耦合机制研究以查明孔隙度与渗透率相关性差的根源。结果表明,3种沉积–成岩–物性耦合机制形成了7类砂岩是雅布赖盆地新河组块状砂岩物性复杂的根源。高粘滞性砂质碎屑流沉积物在压实作用下形成I类低孔低渗砂岩,低粘滞性砂质碎屑流沉积物在伊利石晶间孔和方解石溶蚀孔的共同作用下形成II类中孔中渗砂岩,颗粒流沉积在方解石胶结物和碎屑长石差异溶蚀作用下形成了III类低孔低渗砂岩、IV类中孔中渗砂岩、V类高孔中渗砂岩、VI类高孔中渗砂岩、VII类高孔高渗砂岩。孔隙度与渗透率交会图中,“左下竖”由I和III类砂岩构成,“右上竖”为VII类砂岩,“一横”由II类和IV~VI类砂岩组成。沉积作用是砂岩物性差异的内在因素,而成岩作用是砂岩物性差异的直接原因,二者共同作用是雅布赖盆地新河组块状砂岩孔隙度和渗透率相关性复杂多变的根源。
Abstract: Based on core observation, physical property, casting thin section and SEM, coupling mechanism of sedimentation-diagenesis-physical property from Xinhe Formation massive sandstones in Yabrai Basin was investigated, in order to discover the root of the poor correlation between porosity and permeability whose crossplot exhibits the complex “two vertical sections clamping one horizontal section” feature. The result shows that 3 kinds of the coupling mechanisms of the sedimentation-diagenesis-physical property control the development processes of 7 types of massive sandstones and this fact is the root of the complex physical property from Xinhe Formation massive sandstones in Yabrai Basin. The high viscous sandy debris flow sediment forms the type-I low porosity and permeability sandstones under compaction. The low viscous sandy debris flow sed-iment with intergranular pore of illites and calcite dissolved pores becomes the type-II middle porosity and permeability sandstones. By the differential dissolution of the calcite cement and feldspar, the grain flow sediment evolves to the type-III low porosity and permeability sandstones, type-IV middle porosity and permeability sandstones, type-V high porosity and middle permeability, type-VI high porosity and middle permeability and type-VII high porosity and permeability. In the crossplot of the porosity and permeability, its left lower vertical section consists of the type-I and type-III sandstones, the right upper vertical section is type-VII sandstones, and the middle horizontal section is composed of the type-II sandstones and type-IV to type-VI sandstones. The root of the poor correlation between porosity and permeability is attributed to the sedimentation and diagenesis, of the two, the former is the internal factor of the poor physical property, and the latter is the direct cause of the poor physical property.
文章引用:周晓峰, 唐海忠, 魏军, 肖文华, 张蕊胜, 李景, 赵隽. 雅布赖盆地新河组块状砂岩沉积–成岩–物性耦合机制[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2020, 42(2): 79-93. https://doi.org/10.12677/JOGT.2020.422019

参考文献

[1] 黄思静, 侯中健. 地下孔隙率和渗透率在空间和时间上的变化及影响因素[J]. 沉积学报, 2001, 19(2): 224-232.
[2] 王瑞飞, 孙卫. 储层沉积–成岩过程中物性演化的主控因素[J]. 矿物学报, 2009, 29(3): 399-404.
[3] 时建超, 孙卫, 张创, 等. 储层沉积–成岩作用的物性响应特征[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(2): 88-93.
[4] Folk, R.L. (1968) Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphill, Austin, 170.
[5] Shanmugam, G. (1996) High-Density Turbidity Currents: Are They Sandy Debris Flows? Journal of Sedi-mentary Research, 66, 2-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 刘立, 杨庆杰, 于均民. 大气水–砂岩的相互作用[J]. 世界地质, 1999, 18(2): 50-55.
[7] 武明辉, 张刘平. 深部流体及其油气成藏效应研究现状[J]. 地学前缘(中国地质大学(北京), 北京大学), 2009, 16(1): 306-313.
[8] 田涛, 任战利, 杨鹏, 等. 多种剥蚀厚度恢复方法在内蒙古雅布赖盆地侏罗系和白垩系中的应用及其地质意义[J]. 古地理学报, 2016, 18(6): 1002-1011.
[9] 田涛, 任战利, 吴晓青, 等. 雅布赖盆地萨尔台凹陷古地温场与油气成藏期次[J]. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(4): 836-844.
[10] 高岗, 赵乐义, 马国福, 等. 雅布赖盆地侏罗系新河组致密油形成条件与有利区资源潜力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3): 478-488.
[11] Stokkendal, J., Friis, H., Svendsen, J.B., et al. (2009) Predictive Permeability Variations in a Hermod Sand Reservoir, Stine Segments, Siri Field, Danish North Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 26, 397-415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Weibel, R., Friis, H., Kazerouni, A.M., et al. (2010) De-velopment of Early Diagenetic Silica and Quartz Morphologies—Examples from the Siri Canyon, Danish North Sea. Sedimentary Geology, 228, 151-170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 张江华, 相鹏. 准噶尔盆地中部1区三工河组低渗透储层成因机制[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 34(1): 43-49.
[14] 王建伟, 宋书君, 鲍志东, 等. 准噶尔盆地庄1井区J1s2段优质储层发育控制因素[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 21(1): 11-14.
[15] 何生, 杨智, 何智亮, 等. 准噶尔盆地腹部超压顶面附近深层砂岩碳酸盐胶结作用和次生溶蚀孔隙形成机理[J]. 地球科学–中国地质大学学报, 2009, 34(5): 759-768.
[16] Pettijohn, F.J., Potter, P.E. and Siever, R. (1973) Sand and Sandstone. Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin, 383-437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 唐海忠, 魏军, 周在华, 等. 酒泉盆地营尔凹陷深层下沟组砂岩方解石胶结物特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(5): 652-661.
[18] 周晓峰, 赵丽霞, 焦淑静, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密砂岩储层伊利石膜特征[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 31(6): 1-8, 103.
[19] Moraes, M.A.S. and De Ros, L.F. (1990) Infiltrated Clays in Fluvial Jurassic Sandstones of Reconcavo Basin, Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 60, 809-819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 周晓峰, 李景, 于均民, 等. 酒泉盆地营尔凹陷下沟组砂岩蒙皂石膜形成机制[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(2): 168-173.