基于TODIM的属性权重未知的混合多属性群决策方法
Hybrid Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Method with Unknown Attribute Weights Based on TODIM
DOI: 10.12677/ORF.2020.103026, PDF,    国家科技经费支持
作者: 刘小月, 张新蕾:对外经济贸易大学,信息学院,北京
关键词: 多属性群决策TODIM混合数据属性权重未知Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making TODIM Hybrid Data Unknown Attribute Weights
摘要: 针对属性权重未知的混合多属性群决策问题,本文首先在对不同数据类型的评价值进行规范化处理的基础上,提出了将精确数、区间数、语言术语转化为概率语言术语集的转化方法;然后通过对个体决策矩阵进行集结,利用离差最大化思想确定属性的权重,并将传统TODIM方法拓展到概率语言环境下,构建相对优势度矩阵,根据总体优势度对备选方案进行排序选择;最后通过算例验证了该方法的可行性。
Abstract: With respect to hybrid multiple attribute group decision making problems with unknown attribute weights, based on normalizing the different types of evaluation values, this paper firstly develops a method for transforming crisp number, interval number and linguistic term into probabilistic linguistic term set. Then, by aggregating the individual decision matrices, the deviation maximization method is used to determine the weights of attributes, and the traditional TODIM method is extended to probabilistic linguistic environment. By constructing relative dominance matrix, the ranking of all feasible alternatives is determined according to the overall dominance degrees. Finally, a numerical example is provided to illustrate the applicability of the proposed method.
文章引用:刘小月, 张新蕾. 基于TODIM的属性权重未知的混合多属性群决策方法[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2020, 10(3): 249-262. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2020.103026

参考文献

[1] Zadeh, L.A. (1979) Fuzzy Set and Information Granularity. Advance in Fuzzy Set Theory & Application, 1, 3-18.
[2] Zadeh, L.A. (1972) A Fuzzy-Set-Theoretic Interpretation of Linguistic Hedges. Journal of Cybernetics, 2, 4-34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Atanassov, K.T. and Rangasamy, P. (1986) Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 20, 87-96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Torra, V. (2010) Hesitant Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25, 529-539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Lourenzutti, R. and Krohling, R.A. (2016) A Generalized TOPSIS Method for Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Information in a Dynamic Environment. Information Sciences, 330, 1-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 赵萌, 张晨曦, 胡亦奇, 李刚. 基于愿景满意度函数的多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 220-230.
[7] 龚承柱, 李兰兰, 卫振锋, 诸克军. 基于前景理论和隶属度的混合型多属性决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(10): 122-128.
[8] 张发明, 肖文星. 混合信息下的动态双激励评价机制设计及应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(12): 138-146.
[9] 马金山. 指标及权重均为混合数据类型的广义灰靶决策方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2018, 34(7): 58-61.
[10] Peng, D.H., Gao, C.Y. and Wu, L.X. (2011) TOPSIS-Based Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making under Heterogeneous Information Setting. Advanced Materials Research, 378-379, 525-530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Gomes, L.F.A.M. and Lima, M.M.P.P. (1991) TODIM: Basic and Application to Multicriteria Ranking of Projects with Environmental Impacts. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 16, 113-127.
[12] Ren, Z.L., Xu, Z.S. and Wang, H. (2017) An Extended TODIM Method under Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Information and Its Application on Enterprise Strategic Assessment. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering & Engineering Management, Singapore, 10-13 December 2017, 1464-1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Sang, X. and Liu, X. (2016) An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets-Based TODIM Method and Its Application to Green Supplier Selection. Journal of the Operational Research So-ciety, 67, 722-734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Lourenzutti, R., Krohling, R.A. and Reformat, M.Z. (2017) Choquet Based TOPSIS and TODIM for Dynamic and Heterogeneous Decision Making with Criteria Interaction. Information Sciences, 408, 41-69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Fan, Z.P., Zhang, X., Chen, F.D. and Liu, Y. (2013) Extended TODIM Method for Hybrid Multiple Attribute Decision Making Problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 42, 40-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Tsaur, R.C. (2011) Decision Risk Analysis for an Interval TOPSIS Method. Applied Mathematics & Computation, 218, 4295-4304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Sevastjanov, P. and Tikhonenko, A. (2013) A Direct Interval Ex-tension of TOPSIS Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 4841-4847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Bohlender, R.B.G. (1986) Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic, Theory and Applications. Mathematics of Computation, 47, 762-763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Xu, Z. and Wang, H. (2017) On the Syntax and Semantics of Virtual Linguistic Terms for Information Fusion in Decision Making. Information Fusion, 34, 43-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Ertugrul, K.E. and Me-htap, D. (2015) An Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Supplier Evaluation and Selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 82, 82-93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Pang, Q., Xu, Z.S. and Wang, H. (2016) Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets in Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making. Information Sciences, 369, 128-143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Zhang, X.F., Gou, X.J., Xu, Z.S. and Liao, H.C. (2019) A Projec-tion Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making with Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 10, 2515-2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef