社会善念研究综述
Overview of Social Kindness
摘要: 社会善念是个体在人际互动中充满善意地关注、尊重并保护他人选择的需要和权利，可通过SoMi范式进行测量。心理理论与观点采择等认知因素和移情与社会取向等人格因素都会影响社会善念的表达。此外，社会善念的表达还受到互动对象、社会阶层等因素的影响。本文重点论述社会善念对合作行为的促进作用，且社会善念的促进作用会受到人际距离、信任、积极情绪和自主性需要等因素的影响。未来研究应深入挖掘影响社会善念表达的相关因素。
Abstract: Social kindness is the right of individuals to care, respect and protect the choices of others in interpersonal interactions, which can be measured by the SoMi paradigm. Cognitive factors such as psychological theory and perspective taking, and personality factors such as empathy and social orientation will affect the expression of social kindness. In addition, the expression of social kindness is also affected by factors such as the interacting people and social class. This paper focuses on the promotion of social kindness to cooperative behavior, which is influenced by interpersonal distance, trust, positive emotion and perceived need for help. In the future, the relevant factors that affect the expression of social kindness should be deeply explored.
文章引用：鲁澳芬 (2020). 社会善念研究综述. 心理学进展, 10(8), 1195-1200. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.108140

参考文献

[1] 窦凯, 刘耀中, 王玉洁, 聂衍刚(2018a). “乐”于合作: 感知社会善念诱导合作行为的情绪机制. 心理学报, 50(1), 101-114.
[2] 窦凯, 聂衍刚, 王玉洁, 刘耀中(2018b). 信任还是设防?互动博弈中社会善念对合作行为的促进效应. 心理科学, 41(2), 390-396.
[3] 李宇, 王沛, 孙连荣(2014). 中国人社会认知研究的沿革、趋势与理论建构. 心理科学进展, 22(11), 1691-1707.
[4] 刘长江, 郝芳(2014). 社会困境问题的理论架构与实验研究. 心理科学进展, 22(9), 1475-1484.
[5] 任彧(2017). 人际距离知觉对利他行为的影响. 硕士论文, 南京: 南京师范大学.
[6] 任彧, 郝芳(2018). 人际距离和情绪知觉对利他选择的影响. 心理与行为研究, 16(3), 321-326.
[7] 杨莹, 寇彧(2015). 亲社会互动中的幸福感: 自主性的作用. 心理科学进展, 23(7), 1226-1235.
[8] Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Trust, Conflict, and Cooperation: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1090-1112.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Balliet, D., Li, N. P., Macfarlan, S. J., & Van Vugt, M. (2011). Sex Differences in Cooperation: A Meta-Analytic Review of Social Dilemmas. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 881-909.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Bjerregaard, K., Haslam, S. A., Morton, T., & Ryan, M. K. (2015). Social and Relational Identification as Determinants of Care Workers’ Motivation and Well-Being. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1460.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Chen, J., Zhong, J., Zhang, Y. X., Li, P., Zhang, A. Q., Tan, Q. B., & Li, H. (2012). Electrophysiological Correlates of Processing Facial Attractiveness and Its Influence on Cooperative Behavior. Neuroscience Letters, 517, 65-70.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social Dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
[CrossRef] 
[13] Declerck, C. H., Boone, C., & Emonds, G. (2013). When Do People Cooperate? The Neuroeconomics of Prosocial Decision Making. Brain and Cognition, 81, 95-117.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Dou, K., Wang, Y., Li, J., Li, J., & Nie, Y. (2018). Perceiving High Social Mindfulness during Interpersonal Interaction Promotes Cooperative Behaviours. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 97-106.
[CrossRef] 
[15] Fiedler, S., Glöckner, A., Nicklisch, A., & Dickert, S. (2013). Social Value Orientation and Information Search in Social Dilemmas: An Eye-Tracking Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 272-284.
[CrossRef] 
[16] Hashimoto, H., Li, Y., & Yamagishi, T. (2011). Beliefs and Preferences in Cultural Agents and Cultural Game Players. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 140-147.
[CrossRef] 
[17] Hilbig, B. E., Glöckner, A., & Zettler, I. (2014). Personality and Prosocial Behavior: Linking Basic Traits and Social Value Orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 529-539.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Hilbig, B. E., Thielmann, I., Wührl, J., & Zettler, I. (2015). From Honesty-Humility to Fair Behavior-Benevolence or a (Blind) Fairness Norm? Personality and Individual Differences, 80, 91-95.
[CrossRef] 
[19] Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., Leist, F., & Heydasch, T. (2013). It Takes Two: Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness Differentially Predict Active versus Reactive Cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 598-603.
[CrossRef] 
[20] Lemmers-Jansen, I. L., Krabbendam, L., Amodio, D. M., Van Doesum, N. J., Veltman, D. J., & Van Lange, P. A. (2018). Giving Others the Option of Choice: An fMRI Study on Low-Cost Cooperation. Neuropsychologia, 109, 1-9.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Lu, J., Huang, X., Liao, C., Guan, Q., Qi, X., & Cui, F. (2020). Social Mindfulness Shown by Individuals with Higher Status Is More Pronounced in Our Brain: ERP Evidence. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 1432.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Mischkowski, D., Thielmann, I., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Think It Through before Making a Choice? Processing Mode Does Not Influence Social Mindfulness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 85-97.
[CrossRef] 
[23] Mittone, L., & Savadori, L. (2009). The Scarcity Bias. Applied Psychology, 58, 453-468.
[CrossRef] 
[24] Patil, I., Cogoni, C., Zangrando, N., Chittaro, L., & Silani, G. (2013). Affective Basis of Judgment-Behavior Discrepancy in Virtual Experiences of Moral Dilemmas. Social Neuroscience, 9, 94-107.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Paul, A. M., Lange, V., Joireman, J., Parks, C. D., & Dijk, E. V. (2013). The Psychology of Social Dilemmas: A Review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 125-141.
[CrossRef] 
[26] Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Bartels, J. M. (2007). Social Exclusion Decreases Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 56-66.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Van Doesum, N. J., de Vries, R. E., Blokland, A. A. J., Hill, J. M., Kuhlman, D. M., Stivers, A. W., Tybur, J. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2020). Social Mindfulness: Prosocial the Active Way. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15, 183-193.
[28] Van Doesum, N. J., Karremans, J. C., Fikke, R. C., de Lange, M. A., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2018). Social Mindfulness in the Real World: The Physical Presence of Others Induces Other-Regarding Motivation. Social Influence, 13, 209-222.
[CrossRef] 
[29] Van Doesum, N. J., Tybur, J. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2017). Class Impressions: Higher Social Class Elicits Lower Prosociality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 11-20.
[CrossRef] 
[30] Van Doesum, N. J., Van Lange, D. A. W., & Van Lange, P. A. (2013). Social Mindfulness: Skill and Will to Navigate the Social World. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 86-103.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Van Doesum, N. J., van Prooijen, J.-W., Verburgh, L., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2016). Social Hostility in Soccer and Beyond. PLoS One, 11, e0153577.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Van Lange, P. A., & Van Doesum, N. J. (2015). Social Mindfulness and Social Hostility. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 18-24.
[CrossRef] 
[33] Van Lange, P. A., Balliet, D., Parks, C. D., & Vugt, M. V. (2014). Social Dilemmas: The Psychology of Human Cooperation. New York: Oxford University Press.
[34] Vesely, S., Klöckner, C. A., & Brick, C. (2020). Pro-Environmental Behavior as a Signal of Cooperativeness: Evidence from a Social Dilemma Experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, Article ID: 101362.
[CrossRef] 
[35] Weber, J. M., Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2004). Normal Acts of Irrational Trust: Motivated Attributions and the Trust Development Process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 75-101.
[CrossRef]