生命何以特殊?生命性对记忆的影响及认知机制
Why Is Life Special? The Animacy Effect on Memory and Its Underlying Mechanisms
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2020.108150, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 杨格晴#, 祁新越#, 允寒琦#:北京师范大学,心理学部,北京;杨春亮*:北京师范大学,心理学部,北京;北京师范大学,心理学部发展心理研究院,北京
关键词: 生命性效应注意捕获心理唤起死亡凸显表象加工Animacy Effect Attention Capture Mental Arousal Mortality Salience Image Processing
摘要: 生命性效应是人类的一种记忆现象,指生命实体比无生命实体更容易被识记。该效应是人类记忆系统在进化过程中被赋予功能性的体现,主要由记忆材料自身的生命属性所引发,并且在不同的实验范式、刺激材料和记忆范畴中均稳定存在。生命性对记忆的影响可以从注意捕获、唤起与激活、加工深度等不同的认知加工过程进行解释。未来研究应在进一步界定生命性概念的基础上,关注不同认知机制间的传递关系,采用更严谨、多样化的任务范式,探究生命性效应的长时可持续性,考察生命性效应的神经机制及其在外语学习中的应用价值。
Abstract: In recent years, an emerging body of evidence has established that animacy facilitates memory formation and retention, a phenomenon termed the animacy effect (that is, animate entities are remembered better than inanimate ones). From an adaptive perspective, it is important for our memory system to be sensitive to animate information. Thus, the animacy effect manifests the adaptability that human memory system has been endowed in evolution. Based on the connotation of the animacy effect, the current review: 1) summarizes empirical findings from previous research, 2) introduces the cognitive mechanisms underlying the effect (including the attention capture, arousal and activation, and depth of processing mechanisms), and 3) enlightens some directions for future research. The long-term persistency of the effect remains unclear, and the transitive relations among those different mechanisms, the neural underpinnings of the animacy effect and its practical significance in foreign language learning are promising directions for future research.
文章引用:杨格晴, 祁新越, 允寒琦, 杨春亮 (2020). 生命何以特殊?生命性对记忆的影响及认知机制. 心理学进展, 10(8), 1274-1285. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.108150

参考文献

[1] 于睿, 毛伟宾, 贾喆(2011). 生存加工: 一种独特而强大的记忆编码程序. 心理科学进展, 19(6), 825-831.
[2] Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion Onset Captures Attention. Psychological Science, 14, 427-432.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Aslan, A., & John, T. (2016). The Development of Adaptive Memory: Young Children Show Enhanced Retention of Animacy-Related Information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 152, 343-350.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Barrett, H. C., Todd, P. M., Miller, G. F., & Blythe, P. W. (2005). Accurate Judgments of Intention from Motion Cues Alone: A Cross-Cultural Study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 313-331.
[CrossRef
[5] Bassili, J. (1976). Temporal and Spatial Contingencies in the Perception of Social Events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 680-685.
[CrossRef
[6] Bell, R., Röer, J. P., & Buchner, A. (2015). Adaptive Memory: Thinking about Function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1038-1048.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Bonin, P., Gelin, M., & Bugaiska, A. (2014). Animates Are Better Remembered than Inanimates: Further Evidence from Word and Picture Stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 42, 370-382.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Bonin, P., Gelin, M., Laroche, B., Méot, A., & Bugaiska, A. (2015). The “How” of Animacy Effects in Episodic Memory. Experimental Psychology, 62, 371-384.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Bower, G. H., & Winzenz, D. (1970). Comparison of Associative Learning Strategies. Psychonomic Science, 20, 119-120.
[CrossRef
[10] Bugaiska, A., Grégoire, L., Camblats, A. M., Gelin, M., Méot, A., & Bonin, P. (2019). Animacy and Attentional Processes: Evidence from the Stroop Task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 882-889.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Bugaiska, A., Méot, A., & Bonin, P. (2016). Do Healthy Elders, Like Young Adults, Remember Animates Better than Inanimates? An Adaptive View. Experimental Aging Research, 42, 447-459.
[CrossRef
[12] Calvillo, D. P., & Hawkins, W. C. (2016). Animate Objects Are Detected More Frequently than Inanimate Objects in Inattentional Blindness Tasks Independently of Threat. Journal of General Psychology, 143, 101-115.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Calvillo, D. P., & Jackson, R. E. (2014). Animacy, Perceptual Load, and Inattentional Blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 670-675.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
[CrossRef
[15] Daley, M. J., Andrews, G., & Murphy, K. (2020). Animacy Effects Extend to Working Memory: Results from Serial Order Recall Tasks. Memory, 28, 157-171.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Dhum, M., Herwig, U., Opialla, S., Siegrist, M., & Brühl, A. B. (2017). Evolutionary and Modern Image Content Differentially Influence the Processing of Emotional Pictures. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 415.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Dunsmoor, J. E., Murty, V. P., Davachi, L., & Phelps, E. A. (2015). Emotional Learning Selectively and Retroactively Strengthens Memories for Related Events. Nature, 520, 345-348.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Félix, S. B., Pandeirada, J. N., & Nairne, J. S. (2019). Adaptive Memory: Longevity and Learning Intentionality of the Animacy Effect. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31, 251-260.
[CrossRef
[19] Fukuda, H., & Ueda, K. (2010). Interaction with a Moving Object Affects One’s Perception of Its Animacy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2, 187-193.
[CrossRef
[20] Gelin, M., Bonin, P., Méot, A., & Bugaiska, A. (2018). Do Animacy Effects Persist in Memory for Context? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 965-974.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Gelin, M., Bugaiska, A., Méot, A., & Bonin, P. (2017). Are Animacy Effects in Episodic Memory Independent of Encoding Instructions? Memory, 25, 2-18.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Gelin, M., Bugaiska, A., Méot, A., Vinter, A., & Bonin, P. (2019). Animacy Effects in Episodic Memory: Do Imagery Processes Really Play a Role? Memory, 27, 209-223.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Grill-Spector, K., & Weiner, K. S. (2014). The Functional Architecture of the Ventral Temporal Cortex and Its Role in Categorization. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 536-548.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Guerrero, G., & Calvillo, D. P. (2016). Animacy Increases Second Target Reporting in a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1832-1838.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Hart, J., & Burns, D. J. (2012). Nothing Concentrates the Mind: Thoughts of Death Improve Recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 264-269.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.
[CrossRef
[27] Kensinger, E. A. (2007). Negative Emotion Enhances Memory Accuracy: Behavioral and Neuroimaging Evidence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 213-218.
[CrossRef
[28] Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory Enhancement for Emotional Words: Are Emotional Words More Vividly Remembered than Neutral Words? Memory & Cognition, 31, 1169-1180.
[CrossRef
[29] Laurino, J., & Kaczer, L. (2019). Animacy as a Memory Enhancer during Novel Word Learning: Evidence from Orthographic and Semantic Memory Tasks. Memory, 27, 820-828.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Leding, J. K. (2018). Adaptive Memory: Animacy, Threat, and Attention in Free Recall. Memory & Cognition, 47, 383-394.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Leding, J. K. (2019). Intentional Memory and Online Data Collection: A Test of the Effects of Animacy and Threat on Episodic Memory. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31, 4-15.
[CrossRef
[32] Li, P., Jia, X., Li, X., & Li, W. (2016). The Effect of Animacy on Metamemory. Memory and Cognition, 44, 696-705.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Loucks, J., Verrett, K., & Reise, B. (2020). Animates Engender Robust Memory Representations in Adults and Young Children. Cognition, 201, Article ID: 104284.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Lowder, M. W., & Gordon, P. C. (2015). Natural Forces as Agents: Reconceptualizing the Animate-Inanimate Distinction. Cognition, 136, 85-90.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Meinhardt, M. J., Bell, R., Buchner, A., & Röer, J. P. (2018). Adaptive Memory: Is the Animacy Effect on Memory Due to Emotional Arousal? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1399-1404.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Meinhardt, M. J., Bell, R., Buchner, A., & Röer, J. P. (2020). Adaptive Memory: Is the Animacy Effect on Memory Due to Richness of Encoding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46, 416-426.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Mieth, L., Roeer, J. P., Buchner, A., & Bell, R. (2019). Adaptive Memory: Enhanced Source Memory for Animate Entities. Memory, 27, 1304-1042.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Moscovitch, M., & Craik, F. I. M. (1976). Depth of Processing, Retrieval Cues, and Uniqueness of Encoding as Factors in Recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 447-458.
[CrossRef
[39] Nairne, J. S. (2010). Chap. 1. Adaptive Memory: Evolutionary Constraints on Remembering. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 53, pp. 1-32). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
[CrossRef
[40] Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Thompson, S. R. (2008). Adaptive Memory: The Comparative Value of Survival Processing. Psychological Science, 19, 176-180.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Nairne, J. S., Thompson, S. R., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2007). Adaptive Memory: Survival Processing Enhances Retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 263-273.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Nairne, J. S., VanArsdall, J. E., & Cogdill, M. (2017). Remembering the Living: Episodic Memory Is Tuned to Animacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 22-27.
[CrossRef
[43] Nairne, J. S., VanArsdall, J. E., Pandeirada, J. N. S., Cogdill, M., & LeBreton, J. M. (2013). Adaptive Memory: The Mnemonic Value of Animacy. Psychological Science, 24, 2099-2105.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-Specific Attention for Animals Reflects Ancestral Priorities, Not Expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 16598-16603.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Opfer, J. E., & Gelman, S. A. (2011). Development of the Animate-Inanimate Distinction. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (2nd ed., pp. 213-238). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
[CrossRef
[46] Pexman, P. M., Hargreaves, I. S., Siakaluk, P. D., Bodner, G. E., & Pope, J. (2008). There Are Many Ways to Be Rich: Effects of Three Measures of Semantic Richness on Visual Word Recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 161-167.
[CrossRef
[47] Popp, E. Y., & Serra, M. J. (2016). Adaptive Memory: Animacy Enhances Free Recall but Impairs Cued Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 186-201.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[48] Popp, E. Y., & Serra, M. J. (2018). The Animacy Advantage for Free-Recall Performance Is Not Attributable to Greater Mental Arousal. Memory, 26, 89-95.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[49] Pratt, J., Radulescu, P. V., Guo, R. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). It’s Alive! Animate Motion Captures Visual Attention. Psychological Science, 21, 1724-1730.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[50] Rakison, D. H., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2001). Developmental Origin of the Animate-Inanimate Distinction. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 209-228.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[51] Röer, J. P., Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2013). Is the Survival-Processing Memory Advantage Due to Richness of Encoding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1294-1302.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[52] Sha, L., Haxby, J. V., Abdi, H., Guntupalli, J. S., Oosterhof, N. N., Halchenko, Y. O., & Connolly, A. C. (2015). The Animacy Continuum in the Human Ventral Vision Pathway. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 665-678.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[53] Van Buren, B., & Scholl, B. J. (2017). Minds in Motion in Memory: Enhanced Spatial Memory Driven by the Perceived Animacy of Simple Shapes. Cognition, 163, 87-92.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[54] VanArsdall, J. E., Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N., & Blunt, J. R. (2013). Adaptive Memory: Animacy Processing Produces Mnemonic Advantages. Experimental Psychology, 60, 172-178.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[55] VanArsdall, J. E., Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N., & Cogdill, M. (2015). Adaptive Memory: Animacy Effects Persist in Paired-Associate Learning. Memory, 23, 657- 663.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[56] Vess, M., Routledge, C., Landau, M. J., & Arndt, J. (2009). The Dynamics of Death and Meaning: The Effects of Death-Relevant Cognitions and Personal Need for Structure on Perceptions of Meaning in Life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 728-744.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[57] Wang, L., Wlotko, E., Alexander, E., Schoot, L., Kim, M., Warnke, L., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2020). Neural Evidence for the Prediction of Animacy Features during Language Comprehension: Evidence from MEG and EEG Representational Similarity Analysis. Journal of Neuroscience, 40, 3278-3291.
[CrossRef
[58] Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of Valence, Arousal, and Dominance for 13,915 English Lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1191-1207.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[59] Williams, T. J., Schimel, J., Hayes, J., & Faucher, E. H. (2012). The Effects of Existential Threat on Reading Comprehension of Worldview Affirming and Disconfirming Information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 602-616.
[CrossRef
[60] Wilton, R. N. (2006). Interactive Imagery and Colour in Paired-Associate Learning. Acta Psychologica, 121, 21-40.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[61] Yamamoto, M. (2006). Agency and Impersonality: Their Linguistic and Cultural Manifestations (Vol. 78). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
[CrossRef
[62] Yap, M. J., Tan, S. E., Pexman, P. M., & Hargreaves, I. S. (2011). Is More Always Better? Effects of Semantic Richness on Lexical Decision, Speeded Pronunciation, and Semantic Classification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 742-750.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[63] Yorzinski, J. L., Penkunas, M. J., Platt, M. L., & Coss, R. G. (2014). Dangerous Animals Capture and Maintain Attention in Humans. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 534-548.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]