电子诉讼中在线错时庭审模式的困境与出路——以疫情防控期间鄞州法院的实践运作为切入点
The Dilemma and Outlet of Online Trial Mode in Electronic Litigation—Based on the Practice of Yinzhou Court during the Period of Epidemic Prevention and Control
摘要: 以移动微法院为平台的在线错时庭审模式的横空出世,满足了特殊时期人们的司法需求,也提高了新时期法院化解纠纷、定纷止争的效率,使司法便民真正落到实处。然而,该模式由于尚处于探索阶段,目前陷入一定的困境亟待突破,例如以交互式对话框形式交流与言词原则不相协调、庭审中法庭调查与法庭辩论顺序混乱以及证人出庭作证的真实性与客观性难以保障等。针对这些困境,笔者提出引入“视频留言”以取代现有的“交互式对话框”交流形式,同时以诉讼主体摆脱诉讼责任相关理论为基础纠正现有庭审顺序,利用现代技术对确保在线庭审中证人证言的真实性与客观性作出更为周密与细致的设计与安排,以为该庭审模式的进一步完善提供参考。
Abstract:
The emergence of online trial mode with mobile micro court as the platform not only meets the judicial needs of people in the special period, but also improves the efficiency of the court in re-solving disputes, settling disputes and stopping disputes in the new period, so that the judicial convenience can be truly implemented. However, due to the fact that the mode is still in the ex-ploratory stage, it is in a certain dilemma and needs to be broken through. For example, the communication in the form of interactive dialog box is not in harmony with the principle of words, the order of court investigation and court debate in court trial is disordered, and the authenticity and objectivity of witnesses testifying in court are difficult to guarantee. In view of these difficulties, the author proposes to introduce “video message” to replace the existing “interactive dialog box” communication form, correct the existing trial order based on the theory of litigation subject getting rid of litigation responsibility, and make a more careful and detailed design and arrangement to ensure the authenticity and objectivity of witness testimony in online trial by using modern technology to provide reference for further improvement.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
吴勇. 全球首个!杭州互联网法院“异步审理模式”上线, 颠覆传统[N]. 浙江新闻客户端.
https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1596630089160469812&wfr=spider&for=pc, 2020-8-3.
|
|
[2]
|
张卫平. 民事诉讼法(第四版) [M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016。
|
|
[3]
|
陈杭平, 李凯, 周晗隽. 互联网时代的案件审理新规则——互联网法院案件审理问题研讨会综述[J]. 人民法治, 2018(22): 93-99.
|
|
[4]
|
杨瑞. 异步审理方式对民事诉讼法理的挑战与回应[J]. 司法智库, 2019(1): 170.
|
|
[5]
|
宋朝武. 电子司法的实践运用与制度碰撞[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2011(6): 68-69.
|
|
[6]
|
姜世明. 民事诉讼法(上册) [M]. 台北: 新学林出版股份有限公司, 2013: 45.
|
|
[7]
|
[德]罗森贝克, 施瓦布. 德国民事诉讼法[M]. 李大雪, 译. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2007: 544-560.
|
|
[8]
|
[德]罗森贝克, 施瓦布. 德国民事诉讼法[M]. 李大雪, 译. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2007: 758-765.
|
|
[9]
|
马龙. 民事诉讼中逾时提出攻击防御方法之规制研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2018: 42-47.
|
|
[10]
|
[日]中村英郎. 新民事诉讼法讲义[M]. 陈刚, 等, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2002: 187.
|
|
[11]
|
陈瑞华. 什么是真正的直接和言词原则[J]. 证据科学, 2016(3): 267.
|