从儿童习得普遍语法规则看刺激贫乏论的发展
The Development of the Poverty of Stimulus Argument from the Perspective of Children’s Acquisition of Universal Grammar
摘要: 刺激贫乏论是生成语法的重要根基，也是普遍语法的理论依据，揭示了儿童语言习得过程中语言输入与语言能力之间的巨大鸿沟。刺激贫乏之争已经持续了近六十多年，依旧尚未停歇。本文将主要介绍刺激贫乏论之争的来龙去脉，从儿童习得普遍语法规则介绍刺激贫乏争论双方的主要观点。本文认为，反方论证不足以撼动刺激贫乏论的理论地位，低估了语言的复杂性，忽略了一些语言事实。
Abstract: Poverty of stimulus is a concrete foundation of generative grammar and the theoretical basis of universal grammar. It reveals a huge gap between language input and language competence in the process of children’s language acquisition. The poverty of stimulus argument has been lasting for nearly sixty years, and hasn’t stopped yet. This article mainly introduces the ins and outs of the poverty of stimulus argument, and looks at main points from both sides of it from the view of chil-dren’s acquisition of universal grammar rules. We think that the opposite argument is not fully enough to shake the theoretical status of the poverty of stimulus theory, which underestimates the complexity of language and also ignores some language facts.
文章引用：邵桢贻. 从儿童习得普遍语法规则看刺激贫乏论的发展[J]. 现代语言学, 2020, 8(4): 631-638. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2020.84086

参考文献

[1] Chomsky, N. (1980) Rules and Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 1-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Pinker, S. (1991) Rules of Language. Science, 253, 530-535. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/253/5019/530.abstract [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Seidenberg, M.S. (1997) Language Acquisition and Use: Learning and Applying Probabilistic Constraints. Science, 275, 1599-1603. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/275/5306/1599.abstract [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Tomasello, M. and Ibbotson, P. (2016) Evidence Rebuts Chomsky’s Theory of Language Learning. Scientific American, 5, 70-75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Lidz, J. (2016) Chomsky’s Theory of Language Learning Dead? Not So Fast… https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/chomsky-s-theory-of-language-learning-dead-not-so-fast
[6] Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures. Mouton, The Hague. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Chomsky, N. (1964) Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Mouton, The Hague.
[8] Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] 冯志伟. 乔姆斯基“刺激贫乏论”评述[EB/OL]. http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_72d083c70100o9dl.html, 2011-02-04.
[10] Baker, C.L. (1979) Syntactic Theory and the Projection Problem. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 233-280. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178133?seq=1
[11] Hornstein, N. and Lightfoot, D. (1985) Explanation in Linguistics. The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. Longman, London.
[12] 韩景泉. 乔姆斯基的形式主义语言研究[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2000(1): 34-41.
[13] Crain, S. and Thornton, R. (1998) Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge.
[14] 马志刚. 自愿存疑, 主动生惑: 刺激贫乏(POS)论再探——以英语助动词前置为例解读生成语言学的最简计算[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2016, 39(5): 49-55.
[15] Crain, S. and Nakayama, M. (1987) Structure Dependence in Grammar Formation. Language, 63, 522-543. https://www.jstor.org/stable/415004 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Chomsky, N. (2006) Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968) The Sound Pattern of Eng-lish. Harper & Row, New York.
[18] Crain, S. and Pietroski, P. (2002) Why Language Acquisition Is a Snap. The Linguistic Review, 19, 163-183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] Legate, J.A. and Yang, C.D. (2002) Empirical Re-Assessment of Stimulus Poverty Arguments. The Linguistic Review, 19, 151-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[20] Crain, S., Khlentzos, D. and Thornton, R. (2010) Universal Grammar versus Language Diversity. Lingua, 120, 2668-2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] Su, Y.E., Zhou, P. and Crain, S. (2012) Downward Entailment in Child Mandarin. Journal of Child Language, 39, 957-990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Sugisaki, K. and Murasugi, K. (2015) The Acquisition of Wh-Islands in Japanese: A Preliminary Study. Nanzan Linguistics, 10, 43-53. https://www.ic.nanzan-u.ac.jp/LINGUISTICS/publication/pdf/NL10-3-Sugisaki_Murasugi.pdf
[23] 王强. 刺激贫乏论诠释[J]. 当代外语研究, 2012(4): 20-26.
[24] Laurence, S. and Margolis, E. (2001) The Poverty of the Stimulus Argument. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52, 217-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Lasnik, H. and Uriagereka, J. (2002) On the Poverty of the Challenge. The Linguistic Review, 19, 147-150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] Scholz, B.C. and Pullum, G.K. (2002) Searching for Arguments to Support Linguistic Nativism. The Linguistic Review, 19, 185-223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[27] Fodor, J.D. and Crowther, C. (2002) Understanding Stimulus Poverty Arguments. The Linguistic Review, 19, 105-145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] Sampson, G. (2002) Exploring the Richness of the Stimulus. The Linguistic Review, 19, 73-104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[29] Clark, A. and Lappin, S. (2010) Linguistic Nativism and the Poverty of the Stimulus. John Wiley & Son, Hoboken. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[30] Berwick, R.C., Pietroski, P., Yankama, B. and Chomsky, N. (2011) Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited. Cognitive Science, 35, 1207-1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]