甘肃省降水量自动观测与人工观测对比分析
Comparative Analysis of Automatic Observation and Manual Observation of Precipitation in Gansu Province
摘要: 利用甘肃敦煌、酒泉、民勤、榆中、西峰和岷县6个气象站2004~2007年自动观测与人工观测的降水资料,对比分析了2种观测序列的差值特征,并基于BP神经网络建立了自动降水观测订正模型。研究表明,自动观测的降水量与人工观测的标准差为0.254 mm,平均偏大0.033 mm (相对偏高2.24%);76%的自动观测与人工观测的日降水量差值在±10%以内,近11%的样本日降水量测量差值在±20%以上;日降雨量相对差值较大的样本,其日降雨量均比较小;利用BP神经网络模型订正后,自动观测的日降水量拟合差为0.05~0.52 mm,平均相对误差0.5%~8.2%,平均相对均方根误差为0.10~0.70 mm,相关系数为0.75~0.99。
Abstract: Using the precipitation data from 6 meteorological stations in Dunhuang, Jiuquan, Minqin, Yuzhong, Xifeng and Minxian in Gansu Province from 2004 to 2007, the difference characteristics between automatic and manual observations were analyzed. Based on BP neural network, a correction model for automatic precipitation observation was established. Studies have shown that the standard deviation between the automatically observed precipitation and the manually observed precipitation is 0.254 mm. The average of automatic observation is 0.033 mm (2.24%) larger than that of manual observation. 76% of the difference in daily precipitation between automatic observation and manual observation is within ±10%, and at the same time, the measurement difference of daily precipitation close to 11% of the samples is more than ±20%. For samples with relatively large daily rainfall differences, the daily rainfall is relatively small. After the correction using the BP neural network model, the fitting difference of automatically observed daily precipitation is 0.05 to 0.52 mm, the average relative error is 0.5% to 8.2%, the average relative root mean square error is 0.10 to 0.70 mm, and the correlation coefficient is 0.75 to 0.99.
文章引用:肖玮, 陈晓燕. 甘肃省降水量自动观测与人工观测对比分析[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2020, 9(5): 423-433. https://doi.org/10.12677/CCRL.2020.95047

参考文献

[1] 余君. 自动气象站与人工站气温、相对湿度观测结果的差异及其原因的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国气象科学研究院, 2007.
[2] 胡玉峰. 自动与人工观测数据的差异[J]. 应用气象学报, 2004, 15(6): 719-726.
[3] 杨大庆, 张志忠, 康尔泗, 等. 地面积雪测量与雨量器量测降雪量一致性实验研究[J]. 水科学进展, 1992, 3(2): 136-141.
[4] 翟盘茂. 中国历史探空资料中的一些过失误差及偏差问题[J]. 气象学报, 1997, 55(5): 563-569.
[5] 刘小宁, 王淑清, 吴增祥, 等. 我国两种蒸发观测资料的对比分析[J]. 应用气象学报, 1998, 9(3): 321-328.
[6] 曹丽娟, 鞠晓慧, 刘小宁. PMFT方法对我国年平均风速的均一性检验[J]. 气象, 2010, 36(10): 52-56.
[7] 杜波, 张雪芬, 胡树贞, 等. 天气现象仪自动化观测资料对比分析[J]. 气象科技, 2014, 42(4): 617-623.
[8] 王颖, 刘小宁. 自动站与人工观测气温的对比分析[J]. 应用气象学报, 2002, 13(6): 74-78.
[9] 顾品强, 王美华. II型自动站与常规站温湿度观测记录的比较[J]. 气象, 2003, 29(1): 35-38.
[10] 余君, 胡玉峰, 刘均. 我国中部地区自动站与人工站气温的差异及原因分析[J]. 气象, 2007, 33(5): 94-99.
[11] 尹宪志, 郭爱民, 卢会云. CAWS型自动站与人工观测风速记录的对比分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2006, 24(1): 57-59.
[12] 任芝花, 冯明农, 张洪政, 等. 自动与人工观测降雨量的差异及相关性[J]. 应用气象学报, 2007, 18(3): 358-363.
[13] 李军, 黄敬峰, 王秀珍, 等. 山区月平均气温的短序列订正方法研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2005, 31(2): 165-170.
[14] Sun, B., Baker, C.B., Karl, T.R., et al. (2004) A Comparative Study of ASOS and USCRN Temperature Measurements. Journal of At-mospheric & Oceanic Technology, 22, 679-686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 熊安元, 朱燕君, 任芝花, 等. 观测仪器和百叶箱的变化对地面气温观测值的影响及其原因分析[J]. 气象学报, 2006, 64(3): 377-384.
[16] 连志鸾. 自动站与人工站观测记录的差异分析[J]. 气象, 2005, 31(3): 48-60.
[17] 石登科, 崔学祯. 甘肃临夏人工与自动气象站气温观测差异对比及均一性研究[J]. 干旱气象, 2008, 26(4): 71-74.
[18] 任芝花, 王改利, 邹风玲, 等. 中国降水测量误差的研究[J]. 气象学报, 2003, 61(5): 621-627.