物理性别刻板印象对大学生自我效能感和学业情绪的影响:性别的调节作用
The Impact of Physical Gender Stereotypes on College Students’ Academic Self-Efficacy and Academic Emotions: The Moderating Effect of Gender
摘要: 以华中师范大学物理科学与技术学院的230名大学生为被试,考察物理性别刻板印象、学业自我效能感和学业情绪的关系及其相互作用机制。结果表明:1) 物理性别刻板印象正向预测消极学业情绪、负向预测积极学业情绪、负向预测学业自我效能感;学业自我效能感正向预测积极学业情绪、负向预测消极学业情绪;2) 学业自我效能感在物理性别刻板印象和学业情绪的关系中起中介作用;3) 性别在模型中的调节效应不显著;4) 相对中学生而言,大学生的物理性别刻板印象水平很低,且男性的物理性别刻板印象高于女性。本研究发现了物理性别刻板印象对学生自我效能感和学业情绪的消极影响,启发教育者在教学中减少学生的物理性别刻板印象,为大学专业的物理教学提供了理论和实践参考。
Abstract: 230 college students from the School of Physics and Technology of Central China Normal University are the subjects. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship and interaction mechanism among physical gender stereotypes, academic self-efficacy, and academic emotions. The results show that: 1) Physical gender stereotypes positively predict academic negative emotions, negatively predict academic positive emotions, and negatively predict academic self-efficacy. Academic self-efficacy positively predicts academic positive emotions and negatively predicts academic negative emotions. 2) Academic self-efficacy plays an intermediary role in the relationship between physical gender stereotypes and academic emotions. 3) In the model, the regulatory effect of gender is not significant. 4) Compared with middle school students, college students’ physical sex stereotypes are very low. Besides, male physical sex stereotypes are higher than females. This study finds the negative impact of physical gender stereotypes on self-efficacy and academic emotions, in order to inspire educators to reduce students’ physical gender stereotypes in teaching. Furthermore, the study provides theoretical and practical references for college professional physics teaching.
文章引用:任婧涵 (2020). 物理性别刻板印象对大学生自我效能感和学业情绪的影响:性别的调节作用. 心理学进展, 10(9), 1302-1314. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2020.109153

参考文献

[1] 姜晓琳, 王鹏, 王美芳(2010). 大学生性别、性别角色与职业性别刻板印象的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, (3), 366-368.
[2] 蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 洪伟, 金芳凯(2019). 高中生数学能力实体观对数学学习投入的影响: 学业自我效能感和消极学业情绪的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 35(1), 51-59.
[3] 李戈(2019). 中学生物理性别刻板印象与物理学业成绩的关系. 硕士论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[4] 李赛丽(2012). 中学生学业情绪问卷的编制及调查研究. 硕士论文, 天津: 天津师范大学.
[5] 马超周(2019). 数学学业情绪对数学学业成就的影响: 数学自我效能和数学学习策略的中介效应分析. 硕士论文, 长春: 东北师范大学.
[6] 马静影(2009). 大学生内隐物理——性别刻板印象的研究. 硕士论文, 天津: 天津师范大学.
[7] 宋静静, 佐斌, 温芳芳, 叶姝槿(2016). 中学生物理性别刻板印象与学业拖延: 序列中介模型. 中国临床心理学杂志(24), 518.
[8] 宋淑娟, 刘华山(2015). 数学-性别刻板印象对女生的威胁效应: 场认知风格的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 13(3), 302-305, 319.
[9] 孙士梅(2006). 青少年学业情绪发展特点及其与自我调节学习的关系. 硕士论文, 济南: 山东师范大学.
[10] 孙思雨(2018). 初中生数学自我效能感、自我评价及其准确性的调查研究. 硕士论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
[11] 索向兴(2002). 教师必须克服对学生的认知偏见. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 3(1), 103-105.
[12] 佟丽君, 侯东辉(2009). 高中生职业性别刻板印象的内隐联想测验研究. 心理科学, (1), 143-145 + 149.
[13] 王洪礼, 胡寒春(2005). 贵州省高师本科大学生学业自我效能感与心理健康水平的研究. 心理科学, (3), 164-166.
[14] 王云鹏(2007). 大学生学业自我效能感、成就动机与职业兴趣之间的关系研究. 硕士论文, 长春: 吉林大学.
[15] 徐先彩, 龚少英(2009). 学业情绪及其影响因素. 心理科学进展, 17(1), 92-97.
[16] 张纯(2016). 中学生强目标、学业情绪与学业自我效能感的关系研究. 硕士论文, 上海: 华东师范大学.
[17] 张鼎昆, 方俐洛, 凌文辁(1999). 自我效能感的理论及研究现状. 心理科学进展, (1), 39-43.
[18] 张芮菁(2016). 高中生成就目标对考试焦虑的影响: 学业自我效能感的中介作用. 硕士论文, 武汉: 中南民族大学.
[19] Allport, G. W. (1946). The Psychology of Participation. Occupational Psychology, 20, 54-62.
[20] Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A Neuropsychological Theory of Positive Affect and Its Influence on Cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529-550.
[CrossRef
[21] Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1995). Implicit Gender Stereotyping in Judgments of Fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 272-281.
[CrossRef
[22] Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 139-161.
[CrossRef
[23] Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59-78.
[CrossRef
[24] Daniels, L. M., Haynes, T. L., Stupnisky, R. H., Perry, R. P., Newall, N. E., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Individual Differences in Achievement Goals: A Longitudinal Study of Cognitive, Emotional, and Achievement Outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 584-608.
[CrossRef
[25] Efklides, A., & Volet, S. (2005). Emotional Experiences during Learning: Multiple, Situated and Dynamic. Learning and Instruction, 15, 377-380.
[CrossRef
[26] Ellis, J., Fosdick, B. K., & Rasmussen, C. (2016). Women 1.5 Times More Likely to Leave Stem Pipeline after Calculus Compared to Men: Lack of Mathematical Confidence a Potential Culprit. PLoS ONE, 11, e0157447.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Pekrun, R. (2006). The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341.
[CrossRef
[28] Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic Emotions in Students’ Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91-105.
[CrossRef
[29] Pintrich, P. R., Anderman, E. M., & Klobucar, C. (1994). Intraindividual Differences in Motivation and Cognition in Students with and without Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 360.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
[CrossRef