非冻结可破碎模型冰的实验设计与分析
Experimental Design and Analysis of Breakable Artificial Model Ice
DOI: 10.12677/IaE.2020.83013, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 冯 峰, 张承森, 王 超, 汪春辉*, 郭春雨, 徐 佩:哈尔滨工程大学船舶工程学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨
关键词: 模型实验相似准则非冻结模型冰试验技术Model Experiment Similarity Criterion Artificial Model Ice Test Technology
摘要: 船–冰模型试验按模型冰的种类可分为冰水池中的冻结模型冰试验和常规拖曳水池中的非冻结模型冰试验,但目前常规拖曳水池试验使用的模型冰不能满足破碎条件。本文在总结冰水池冻结模型冰特点和船–冰模型试验模型率的基础上研发出一种新的非冻结模型冰。根据国际拖曳水池会议推荐的试验方法对该非冻结模型冰进行单轴压缩和三点弯曲试验。结果显示在缩尺比1:30的情况下,该非冻结模型冰可以用于船–冰相互作用试验。
Abstract: According to the type of model ice, the ship-ice model test can be divided into frozen model ice test in ice tank and artificial model ice test in conventional towing tank. In this paper, a new type of ar-tificial model ice is developed on the basis of summarizing the characteristics of the model ice in ice tank and the model rate of the ship-ice model test. Uniaxial compression and three point bending tests were performed on the artificial model ice according to the test method recommended by the International Towing Tank Conference. The results show that the artificial model ice can be used for ship-ice interaction test at a scale ratio of 1:30.
文章引用:冯峰, 张承森, 王超, 汪春辉, 郭春雨, 徐佩. 非冻结可破碎模型冰的实验设计与分析[J]. 仪器与设备, 2020, 8(3): 100-106. https://doi.org/10.12677/IaE.2020.83013

参考文献

[1] 李振福, 孙悦, 韦博文. “冰上丝绸之路”——北极航线船舶航行安全的跟驰模型[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2018, 44(3): 22-27.
[2] 王梦颖, 穆顷, 张晓频, 张霖, 李明. 渤海固定结构物冰力特点及计算方法[J]. 船海工程, 2016, 45(5): 135-138.
[3] 王超, 叶礼裕, 常欣, 李兴. 非接触工况下冰桨干扰水动力载荷试验[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2017, 38(8): 1190-1196.
[4] 黄焱, 马高强, 孙剑桥. 船–冰碰撞载荷时间历程的模型试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(4): 7-14.
[5] 郭春雨, 徐佩, 张海鹏. 冰对螺旋桨水动力性能影响的试验研究[J]. 船海力学, 2018, 22(7): 797-806.
[6] 康瑞. 平整冰中破冰船操纵性能预报[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2016.
[7] Huang, Y., Huang, S.Y., et al. (2018) Experiments on Navigating Resistance of an Icebreaker in Snow Covered Level Ice. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 152, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 王庆凯. 北极航道融冰期海冰物理和力学工程参数研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2019.
[9] Kim, H. and Colbourne, B. (2016) A Study of the Effect of Contact Surface Geometry and Crushing Rate on the Behavior of the Ice. Ocean Engineering, 126, 240-253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Jeong, S.-Y., et al. (2017) Implementation of Ship Perfor-mance Test in Brash Ice Channel. Ocean Engineering, 140, 57-65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Luo, W.-Z., Guo, C.-Y., et al. (2018) Experimental Research on Resistance and Motion Attitude Variation of Ship- Wave-Ice Interaction in Marginal Ice Zones. Marine Structures, 58, 399-415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Kvadsheim, S. (2014) Ice Ridge Keel Size Distributions: Analysis of Ice Ridge Keel Thickness from Upward Looking Sonar Data from the Fram Strait Using Extreme Value Theory. NTNU.
[13] Zhang, J., et al. (2019) A Stochastic Method for the Prediction of Icebreaker Bow Extreme Stresses. Applied Ocean Research, 87, 95-101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef